Sentences with phrase «then use them in court»

If you ever attempt (and a few have) to use any of the stories mention in the bible as a test of scientific theory and then use them in court for defense, by invoking the angel Satan made me do it, or God said so, then who are you to say «He's lying», in short mold the fantasy into your reality.

Not exact matches

Remember though, if you default on a secured loan then the assets or asset class you used as a security could be seized by the creditor in a Court procedure that could also put your company out of business, so there is some element of risk to consider with asset - based financing.

In the court filing, Berns says it is as if the IRS learned of someone using Amazon to avoid taxes, and then demanded the company turn over all its customer accounts.

Then in Employment Division v. Smith (1990), the Court held that members of the Native American Church could not claim a religious exemption for unemployment benefits after they were fired for using peyote, a criminal offense in Oregon.

Either way, my question was whether you actually show up in court and use «Asshole,» as a rebuttal, take insult at every argument, misunderstand everything said to you, and then refuse to address the actual point being made.

A legislative body could expand the concept of arms in «common use» by permitting (or at least not prohibiting) civilian ownership, and if it reached a point where the courts found it to be «common,» then it would fall under Second Amendment protection.

A Brooklyn bar owner claims his ex hacked into his Google accounts to steal documents she then used in family court to get his child support payments jacked up by...

Considering himself «above the law,» state Sen. John Sampson embezzled funds and then used his political clout and lawyer skills to try and cover up the crimes, prosecutors said in openings at his Brooklyn federal court trial Wednesday.

The government's key witness in the corruption retrial of Sheldon Silver used Hebrew code to tell the then - Assembly speaker in 2014 that he had been visited by FBI agents who were poking around the powerful politician's finances, it was revealed in Manhattan federal court Tuesday.

But then, he's got bigger troubles: He's awaiting trial on separate corruption charges in Manhattan federal court, where he's charged with illegally using a nonprofit group — one that he had supported with taxpayer contributions as a City Council member — in his political campaigns.

The practice of using taxpayer dollars to settle sexual harassment claims lodged against public officials was upheld in 2008 after a taxpayer filed suit in State Supreme Court to challenge a $ 500,000 settlement paid to woman who accused Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver's then - counsel, Michael Boxley, of rape.

Since then I started and have been operating one of the largest international dating sites introducing Eastern European women seeking foreign men, and talked to thousands of people who used our service or had questions about courting Slavic ladies, as well as read hundreds of stories from people who were successful in meeting someone through Elena's Models.

This paper examines the nature of and reasons for courts» increasing separation of powers concerns and then briefly explores what lessons adequacy plaintiffs might take away for use in future litigation.

Since then, a high - profile court battle ensued, resulting in a Superior Court judge finding that the program violates the state's constitutional mandate to use public funds only for public schools — but thanks to a Court of Appeals ruling last month, the state must disburse school vouchers that have already been awarded while the case winds its way through the state appellate cocourt battle ensued, resulting in a Superior Court judge finding that the program violates the state's constitutional mandate to use public funds only for public schools — but thanks to a Court of Appeals ruling last month, the state must disburse school vouchers that have already been awarded while the case winds its way through the state appellate coCourt judge finding that the program violates the state's constitutional mandate to use public funds only for public schools — but thanks to a Court of Appeals ruling last month, the state must disburse school vouchers that have already been awarded while the case winds its way through the state appellate coCourt of Appeals ruling last month, the state must disburse school vouchers that have already been awarded while the case winds its way through the state appellate courts.

«If the court will not enforce the Legislature's clear and unambiguous intent in the Stull Act, then their refusal underscores the need for Governor Brown to sign AB 2826, clarifying the measures of student progress that must be used in the evaluation of educators,» Welch said.

And social security or other government benefits (beyond $ 9,000 p / y) may be seized to repay government student loans, under a 1996 law upheld by the Supreme Court in 2005 But if the student loans are strictly private, not guaranteed by the government, then the lender can only use the collection options available to any creditor.

Nor did the Cheesman court engage in any analysis regarding the various undue hardship tests then in use.

And if your dog has been noted for being unruly, excitable, and out of control in the past... then that can and will be used against you in court.

Includes * Private en - suite room (with separat entrance) * Includes the use of a small court * Fridge in room * Air condition * Private parking When You book Double room at cottage BACVICE (2 persons) and Twin room at cottage BACVICE (2 persons) then You book whole cottage «BAČVICE «for 4 persons!

There's also some «fancy» new shots, such as the Zone Shot: it allows you to pin point an area of the court using motion controls, and then send the ball smashing down in that direction.

Prompted by the UK's Criminal Justice Act that prohibits recording and sketching in court, he intends to attend public court hearings for white - collar crimes and then use his own subjective recollection to perform the most objective account possible.

Situated in Cleveland's downtown Galleria mall, the core of Gardens Under Glass is a demonstration greenhouse with food grown there now used in some of the food court businesses... Then there's the fact the potluck was held at all.

The new systems and procedures greatly assist the collision investigator, but it is only with experience gained fromattending a large number of collisions and from using the available evidence that I am then able to explain to a Court precisely what happened, and the physics involved, in a road traffic collision.

One trick I often use is CanLII / IJCan, or even translated Supreme Court judgments on Lexum; I just do a word search in federal statutes or Quebec laws in CanLII (Because they are completely bi-lingual) and then click on the English version on the same statute or law, look for the same section or article and find the correct English version or French version of whatever legal term I am looking.

Then in the same case Facebook was used by the court to summons the inflictor to appear.

More recently, Volokh investigated the disturbing possibility that some reputation management companies are using fake plaintiffs to sue fake defendants for libel, so the two parties can then agree to a court injunction in which the defendant agrees to remove comments or other postings on the internet.

They would then want to use the recordings in the court proceedings to show the judge what is really going on.

While most of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form of weekly moot courts, during which students argued questions of law before professors and submitted occasional written disputations on legal subjects.121 Although Stearns had previously used moot courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinion.124

The person appointed under the Power of Attorney will then use the Power wherever required (in a Notary, a Court, a bank etc.) and will be required to present it to that entity in order to confirm they are legally acting on your behalf.

Rather, their approach was much more theoretical than practical.60 In 1779, Thomas Jefferson, then the Governor of Virginia, established «a Professorship of Law and Police» at William and Mary College.61 George Wythe, a signer of the Declaration of Independence and, not coincidentally, the lawyer under whom Jefferson apprenticed, was appointed.62 The purpose of the course of study Wythe taught was less about producing practicing lawyers than it was educating the statesmen of the New Republic.63 Wythe did attempt to blend in some practical training with his lectures and readings through the use of a moot court and a moot legislature, though there is no indication that Wythe required any writing on the part of the students.In 1779, Thomas Jefferson, then the Governor of Virginia, established «a Professorship of Law and Police» at William and Mary College.61 George Wythe, a signer of the Declaration of Independence and, not coincidentally, the lawyer under whom Jefferson apprenticed, was appointed.62 The purpose of the course of study Wythe taught was less about producing practicing lawyers than it was educating the statesmen of the New Republic.63 Wythe did attempt to blend in some practical training with his lectures and readings through the use of a moot court and a moot legislature, though there is no indication that Wythe required any writing on the part of the students.in some practical training with his lectures and readings through the use of a moot court and a moot legislature, though there is no indication that Wythe required any writing on the part of the students.64

In Parrett v Parrett the BC Court of dealt with the pension income double dipping issue involving a retired BC Supreme Court Judge and focused on requiring the wife to use her money from the pension buyout to earn income and then used only the undivided portion of the husband's pension income for grey divorce spousal support by applying the spousal support advisory guidelines.

In addition, while the Court cautioned that it may exclude counsel due to prior misconduct, such as «commencing class actions, not pursuing them, and then using them to demand ransom from other counsel in carriage disputes,» it could not be said that the motion judge was unaware of the issue, or that he erred in awarding carriage despite MLG's participation in the Rochon GrouIn addition, while the Court cautioned that it may exclude counsel due to prior misconduct, such as «commencing class actions, not pursuing them, and then using them to demand ransom from other counsel in carriage disputes,» it could not be said that the motion judge was unaware of the issue, or that he erred in awarding carriage despite MLG's participation in the Rochon Grouin carriage disputes,» it could not be said that the motion judge was unaware of the issue, or that he erred in awarding carriage despite MLG's participation in the Rochon Grouin awarding carriage despite MLG's participation in the Rochon Grouin the Rochon Group.

In United Brotherhood, then - British Columbia Supreme Court judge Beverly McLachlin (later chief justice of the Supreme Court of Canada), used these words:

if a judge is bias then he is committing criminal obstruction of justice in criminal conspiracy with the lawyer the court of appeal should have ruled - until that is done we will never be able to use the courts.

If you do admit any degree of fault at an accident scene to another driver, a witness or the police who may attend then these such statements / admissions are only used against you in Court by skilled ICBC adjusters and ICBC - appointed defence lawyers.

Under the Lagos High Court Civil Procedure Rules 2012, once a case is filed in court, ADR is then used where there is a response showing some kind of admission on the part of the defenCourt Civil Procedure Rules 2012, once a case is filed in court, ADR is then used where there is a response showing some kind of admission on the part of the defencourt, ADR is then used where there is a response showing some kind of admission on the part of the defendant.

If it is not possible to resolve the disputes ourselves, then we each agree to resolve those disputes or claims between you and Bootstrap Legal of any nature whatsoever, including but not limited to those relating to use of the Site or the quality or appropriateness of services offered by the Bootstrap Legal, shall be resolved by binding arbitration before Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services («JAMS»), rather than in a court of general jurisdiction.

unless this case goes to SCC it will be of no value to the rest of canada - a newsreel media story on Ivan Henrysaid «the judge intentionally labelled Henry vexatious so he would not have a chance to appeal to SCC - the SCC automatically reject the vexatious» i am trying to figure out how this is done - in my case the ns attorney general defence lawyer had been on my case for years then one week before i sent in my SCC appeal books she wrote me and said she had moved to the SCC office where my books would be ariving!!!!!!! i reported this to the SCC but my complaint was ignored - so did the NSAG lawyer get ahold of my books and change them so SCC judges never seen my arguements - thats how bad they do nt want SLR's to use the courts!!!!!!

Many of these lawyers then boast about using an army of AI and human lawyers to stomp on victims and ensure they don't get a fair day in court.

The CJC says there is growing concern about the way such injunctions are being sought and / or used; the powers afforded to the courts (principally the county court, although the youth court can grant civil injunctions against juveniles); the limited powers available to the county court on breach; whether third parties should be involved in the process, and whether breaches of these orders are then a shortcut to mandatory possession orders.

And even where non-English-speaking Hispanic plaintiffs are represented by an English - speaking lawyer, if that lawyer can't speak any Spanish, then he can't communicate directly with the client and share the kind of advice on those seeming trivialities — like how to answer a question or what tone of voice to use in the courtroom or what to do to keep from forgetting what to say — that put clients at ease and make them more effective witnesses in court.

To my mind there exists a dichotomy between assessing testamentary capacity using Banks v Goodfellow and then, having to present evidence to the Court of Protection for a Statutory Will in terms of the Mental Capacity Act.

The Circon case comes with a video that professors can purchase that not only features a wonderful policy discussion on the use of the poison pill by a panel of corporate governance experts, including Judge Jack Jacobs, then Vice Chancellor of the Delaware Chancery Court, but also showcases the two main characters in the case study, the CEO and his long - time friend and fellow Circon board member, presenting their perspectives on the events that transpired.

In effect, if an order - in - council such as that used to intern and relocate Japanese - Canadians during World War II resulted in charges being brought in the Ontario Court of Justice, and that order - in - council was found to be constitutionally invalid, then the Court's decision would trump Parliament's wilIn effect, if an order - in - council such as that used to intern and relocate Japanese - Canadians during World War II resulted in charges being brought in the Ontario Court of Justice, and that order - in - council was found to be constitutionally invalid, then the Court's decision would trump Parliament's wilin - council such as that used to intern and relocate Japanese - Canadians during World War II resulted in charges being brought in the Ontario Court of Justice, and that order - in - council was found to be constitutionally invalid, then the Court's decision would trump Parliament's wilin charges being brought in the Ontario Court of Justice, and that order - in - council was found to be constitutionally invalid, then the Court's decision would trump Parliament's wilin the Ontario Court of Justice, and that order - in - council was found to be constitutionally invalid, then the Court's decision would trump Parliament's wilin - council was found to be constitutionally invalid, then the Court's decision would trump Parliament's will.

After the breath sampling at the police station using the BAC Datamaster C has concluded and breath samples obtained (or not as the case may be) if the breath samples obtained show readings that are all over 80 milligrams then the police may have issued you an ADP driving prohibition in addition to any criminal charges or court process documents.

Finally Chief Justice Hwang noted that «From the perspective of the DIFC Courts, it is not wrong to use the DIFC Courts as a conduit jurisdiction to enforce a foreign judgment and then use the reciprocal mechanisms to execute against assets in another jurisdiction.»

In Kazakewich v. Kazakewich, [1936] A.J. No. 10 (C.A.), the Alberta Court of Appeal summed up the ratios in Lambe, Severn and Edwards in this way at paragraph 86: I take it then that in approaching the interpretation of the pertinent sections of The B.N.A. Act with respect to the administration of justice, a Court should keep in mind that these sections are embodied in an Imperial statute to which the ordinary rules for the interpretation of statutes apply, that therefore the intention of the framers of this Imperial statute must be ascertained as at the date of the enactment by having regard to the words employed without extraneous aids to interpretation where the language is unambiguous, and that having regard however to the nature of the statute, a great constitutional charter, the widest and most liberal construction of the words used should be adopted with a view to giving effect to the whole scheme of Canadian union [Emphasis AddedIn Kazakewich v. Kazakewich, [1936] A.J. No. 10 (C.A.), the Alberta Court of Appeal summed up the ratios in Lambe, Severn and Edwards in this way at paragraph 86: I take it then that in approaching the interpretation of the pertinent sections of The B.N.A. Act with respect to the administration of justice, a Court should keep in mind that these sections are embodied in an Imperial statute to which the ordinary rules for the interpretation of statutes apply, that therefore the intention of the framers of this Imperial statute must be ascertained as at the date of the enactment by having regard to the words employed without extraneous aids to interpretation where the language is unambiguous, and that having regard however to the nature of the statute, a great constitutional charter, the widest and most liberal construction of the words used should be adopted with a view to giving effect to the whole scheme of Canadian union [Emphasis Addedin Lambe, Severn and Edwards in this way at paragraph 86: I take it then that in approaching the interpretation of the pertinent sections of The B.N.A. Act with respect to the administration of justice, a Court should keep in mind that these sections are embodied in an Imperial statute to which the ordinary rules for the interpretation of statutes apply, that therefore the intention of the framers of this Imperial statute must be ascertained as at the date of the enactment by having regard to the words employed without extraneous aids to interpretation where the language is unambiguous, and that having regard however to the nature of the statute, a great constitutional charter, the widest and most liberal construction of the words used should be adopted with a view to giving effect to the whole scheme of Canadian union [Emphasis Addedin this way at paragraph 86: I take it then that in approaching the interpretation of the pertinent sections of The B.N.A. Act with respect to the administration of justice, a Court should keep in mind that these sections are embodied in an Imperial statute to which the ordinary rules for the interpretation of statutes apply, that therefore the intention of the framers of this Imperial statute must be ascertained as at the date of the enactment by having regard to the words employed without extraneous aids to interpretation where the language is unambiguous, and that having regard however to the nature of the statute, a great constitutional charter, the widest and most liberal construction of the words used should be adopted with a view to giving effect to the whole scheme of Canadian union [Emphasis Addedin approaching the interpretation of the pertinent sections of The B.N.A. Act with respect to the administration of justice, a Court should keep in mind that these sections are embodied in an Imperial statute to which the ordinary rules for the interpretation of statutes apply, that therefore the intention of the framers of this Imperial statute must be ascertained as at the date of the enactment by having regard to the words employed without extraneous aids to interpretation where the language is unambiguous, and that having regard however to the nature of the statute, a great constitutional charter, the widest and most liberal construction of the words used should be adopted with a view to giving effect to the whole scheme of Canadian union [Emphasis Addedin mind that these sections are embodied in an Imperial statute to which the ordinary rules for the interpretation of statutes apply, that therefore the intention of the framers of this Imperial statute must be ascertained as at the date of the enactment by having regard to the words employed without extraneous aids to interpretation where the language is unambiguous, and that having regard however to the nature of the statute, a great constitutional charter, the widest and most liberal construction of the words used should be adopted with a view to giving effect to the whole scheme of Canadian union [Emphasis Addedin an Imperial statute to which the ordinary rules for the interpretation of statutes apply, that therefore the intention of the framers of this Imperial statute must be ascertained as at the date of the enactment by having regard to the words employed without extraneous aids to interpretation where the language is unambiguous, and that having regard however to the nature of the statute, a great constitutional charter, the widest and most liberal construction of the words used should be adopted with a view to giving effect to the whole scheme of Canadian union [Emphasis Added].

If I offer a fixed - price «contested» divorce, for example, then the incentive for the client is to make full - use of that pricing model and to regularly and repeatedly want to: 1) talk about their case (i.e., their evil spouse's latest antics) on the phone or in - person; 2) file more motions to get their spouse to do something, to prevent their spouse from doing something, or to object to something the court ruled; 3) send more «demand letters» or make more phone calls to the opposing party or their attorney to tell them to return the car seat, or to complain that they dropped off the child 15 minutes late, etc; and 4) respond to ad hoc motions from the other side (motions for attorney's fees, motions to compel discovery, motions for summary disposition, motions to enforce, etc).

What the Court did not perhaps envision is what transpired in R. v. Welsh, where the communication was made to a police officer posing as a religious figure, who pressured those involve to adopt the faith, and then used this believe to extract a confession.

If you have not used the key then you may be able to resell it to recover some of the cost, in which case you could claim the difference between the resale value and the purchase price, plus court fees.