Sentences with phrase «then uses the claim»

This is exactly what we see in Matthew 2 when King Herod feels threatened by the birth of a baby boy in Bethlehem, and then uses the claim that he wants to worship the new - born Messiah as an excuse for trying to kill Jesus.

Without it one is easily stopped by opportunists who will find petty errors, like M&M did using about 17 1/2 pages of the 20 pages of their first article to describe them, then using the claim that only perfection is acceptable as a basis for denouncing a major collaborative work that has been peer reviewed and even had its conclusions reproduced several times since.

Not exact matches

Amanda Rushing, the lawsuit's plaintiff, claims that Disney's various mobile gaming apps routinely collect smartphone data that can eventually be used to create profiles of children that advertisers can then exploit.

If those efforts fail, by using our Site or other online service, you agree that any complaint, dispute, or disagreement you may have against NBCUniversal, and any claim that NBCUniversal may have against you, arising out of, relating to, or connected in any way with these Terms of Service, our Privacy Policy, or any NBCUniversal Transactions or Relationships shall be resolved exclusively by final and binding arbitration («Arbitration») administered by JAMS or its successor («JAMS») and conducted in accordance with the JAMS Streamlined Arbitration Rules And Procedures in effect at the time the Arbitration is initiated or, if the amount in controversy exceeds $ 100,000, in accordance with the JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules And Procedures then in effect (respectively, the «Applicable Rules»).

The NEB was unperturbed when a Kinder Morgan expert committed fraud, whiting out the word «draft» from a US EPA spill dispersion model, then introducing it to the NEB claiming it was the approach used in the US.

Next, buy a generic auto - trading software, rebrand it, and then make a promotional video with some outrageous claims to draw gullible people in to use the robot and open a trading account with you affiliate broker.

Lawsuit claims that Facebook «stood idly by» as a «treasure trove of data» was transferred to third - party Cambridge Analytica, and then used in the 2016 U.S. presidential elections.

Agents who agree would then accept the tokens as payment in exchange for reducing their traditional commissions in U.S. dollars to as low as 1 percent, or an average of $ 225 per token used, the company claims.

You claim the that magic and miracles are ridiculous and then you try to say that science uses them when it is religion that makes use of them.

What a shame, claiming to be very civilized and then using street thug ism and then outright terrorism.

GFreas: It's funny how you claim to be full of love then use a slur to show your ignorance and intolerance.

using your argument we would had civil rights in this country just because goverments make certain practices illegal does tat mean that what the goverrmet s doing is moral and just, The fact s the goverment attempted to use Christaniaity to bolster it claim to power through this we have the start of the Roman Catholic Church one of the most insidious evil organzations on this planet which as doe more to oppose ad kill true follewers of Christ then ay group o this planet.

I think too that if we're going to start using the Sacred Text for prooftexting our particular understanding of human psychology then what about the claims of Jeremiah that speaks of the unknowability of the human heart?

If sincere religious use of mind - altering drugs is constitutionally exempt from the criminal law, then the courts must pass on all these claims to religious exemption.

If we can't use scripture to prove that, then textbooks and writings of those who claim to be knowledgable should not be used to prove what knowledge is.

Think of the arguments you use, then apply them to the claim that Superman exists, or some other god.

How convenient for you to be able to disavow any Christian zealots who use the bible to call the masses to them and then misuse that power by claiming them non-Christian after the fact.

I am claiming that if it were in god's nature to deem using a computer the most immoral act imaginable, then that is completely arbitrary.

If you claim your god has control and is not using such control to alleviate suffering, then I have no reason to believe that if it actually exists in the manner that your brand of Christianity holds, that it is not immoral beyond any kind of cruelty that man has come up with.

When we add the obvious point that the term itself is very frequently to be found in the synoptic tradition and comparatively infrequently outside it, then it becomes clear that we are fully entitled to claim that the real and significant differences between the use within the synoptic tradition and outside it call for an explanation.

They never heard of the word «specie» then so don't claim they used «genus» for «kind».

Some people seem to think that if you employ an implausible H, then somehow you are committed to it: they seem to think that your claim — that P an are jointly consistent — is no more plausible than the R you use to establish it.

but on the third day using his Power of Resurrection rose from the dead to claim his seat next to God in heaven, I mean next to himself since he was also God and then told the masses that he died for their sins, though oddly enough being God he could have simply absolved them of their sins and he really didn't die because he lives and is coming back to judge man based upon the original sins... but not sure if that would work since man can clearly kill a God with wood and nails... I know, I know confusing and likely to be labeled heresy... but debates about nomenclature and religion... i mean story telling... just don't mix.

That he would not have used passages which he had cherry picked from the Old Testament to then shoe - horn Jesus into these passages, making things up about Jesus, all to support the Christian claim that Jesus was the messiah.

another one them tried to make a case for evolution using principles of adaptation and then claimed that even though it did not fit into the evolutionary timescale it was the methods used that proved the validity of the experiment.

We fall for anything, hate everything, curse people to heII when left with nothing to say, then hysterically claim victory for hurting anyone who's not a Christians feelings, while standing for bigotry and racism, but will gladly use poor syntax, grammar and spelling errors like a weary retired 3rd grader.

One of the things that makes the book the most interesting, is that Wallace begins each chapter explaining some of the tools and approaches he used as a homicide detective, and then he goes on in the rest of the chapter to show how he used this tool or approach to investigate the claims of the Gospels about Jesus Christ.

Wallace begins each chapter explaining some of the tools and approaches he used as a homicide detective, and then he goes on in the rest of the chapter to show how he used this tool or approach to investigate the claims of the Gospels about Jesus Christ.

Then in Employment Division v. Smith (1990), the Court held that members of the Native American Church could not claim a religious exemption for unemployment benefits after they were fired for using peyote, a criminal offense in Oregon.

You are claiming an absolute with «flatly» and then use «probably at least» which is speculation.

You use archeological and geological evidence to support your claim that a huge wave did rip through the middle east where noah was, the flood story evolved from that but then you have to deal with the issues of a tsunami large enough to reach noah from the indian ocean without destroying the entire world.

If you are an athiest and use the term myth in this derogatory (albeit common) way AND you claim to have free will, to be responsible for your actions, to have self - awareness or you claim to be married to or otherwise in a relationship with your true love, then you are a hypocrit.

As to your claim about the keys being used to determine moral right and wrong, I don't see that anywhere in Matthew 16 or Isaiah 22, and although the Jewish people may have understood this as referring to such judgments, they understood then (and even today) that moral judgments are made by God alone and through a proper understanding of what God has said in Scripture.

Using your same argument, then anyone who has claimed the PRESENCE of heaven has also lost all credibility.

To suggest, then, that religious believers (much less majorities who, qua majorities, also have a second claim on shaping public policy) are «wards» depending on the Constitution for their religious freedom and its scope is, to use Posner and Segall's words against them, «to turn the Constitution upside down when it comes to government and religion.»

It seems strange to me that many claim it is yhwh when the w was not used until the 14th century, before then it was a double letter, not considered separate... and could represent either a duoble V (as the french word for W is double v) or a double U.

Livid at religious organizations and politicians claiming to be Christians that they follow Christ but then they use Christ for political gain.

When you stop using the days of the week Tiwsday (Tuesday), Odinsday (Wednesday), Thorsday (Thursday), Friggasday (Friday) or Saturnsday (Saturday), then you can claim that you don't believe in the pagan gods.

Then I use it upon claims empirically verifiable but only tentatively because all tests are subject to bias, mistakes and deceit.

I do not wash my feet (see New Testament) and I have never been to a stoning» @hippypoet «you cant use the bible to refute a claim» @Chad «then you cant use the bible to make a claim» @hippypoet «ah... er... hmmm..

A friend of mine, a straight hillbilly type from Arkansas who raised show pigeons, claimed he used to «have no use for qu ee rs», until he ran across several c0c ks and hens that wouldn't mate and then put them in the same cage because he didn't know what else to do with them, and then they started mating rituals with the same $ ex.

I really like the Hindu idea that we all are «God» play acting in search of OurSelf, unaware that we are God... wish I had thought of that one... (The Bird claims He was the one that originally thought of it... typical, always using someone elses idea and then claims its His own... wait!

I do not wash my feet (see New Testament) and I have never been to a stoning» @hippypoet «you cant use the bible to refute a claim» @Chad «then you cant use the bible to make a claim» @hippypoet

Satan attacks me in my thoughts day and night and he makesit so i can barely eat i pray to the lord and he consoles me god is REAL i used to e a drug dealer the most violent and disruptive of men and one night i came under attack from satan and felt like satan was makeing me into someone im not putting thoughts in my head of death suicide and sexual immorality then i read the wqordof god and everything felt better when i read the Book «The Advocate» spiritual warfare is real and god can save you from satans tourment do nt let Satan claim the rights to your soul i had trouble believing in god for years my mind worked in science and fact but the fact is that God is real and living and when you leave this earth you Will face Judgement

-------------------------- Then support your claim about babies going to hell by using Scripture.

Always fascinated by people that use words like skeptical, and seemto be intelligent, but then claim to have «strong faith».

theo «Then support your claim about babies going to hell by using Scripture.»

If somebody wants to claim that god designed the process or instigated the process or used a spell to enact the process, then those are different arguments as they posit an idea or action outside of the process itself.

You then claim fact by logical reasoning using references that can not be verified.

I am going to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not infringing on anyone's right to practice their religion... Requiring insurance companies to provide contraception for women does not mean the woman has to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want to provide the insurance claiming religious beliefs, then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due to catholic beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible say anything about contraception, since it had not been invented yet — so this is a man - made law, made by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....