Sentences with phrase «then write and read»

The question is, how do we get our students to read and write and then write and read some more?

Not exact matches

And then there's what bestselling novelist Harlan Coben — the perfect guy to read when you want a long plane trip to fly by — writes in his new book, Don't Let Go.

The Safely Remove Hardware tool (the green arrow in the system tray) is meant to complete any reads or writes and then flush disk buffers on the device.

«Users blindly agree to offer details and terms of service without reading them, and then are shocked when they are expected to live up to their side of the agreement,» he wrote.

«If you want to understand how people think and how and why they react, then this is a must read,» writes Weinschenk.

Why, then, do so many business websites (perhaps even yours) still read like books, brochures, or reports — and often badly written ones at that?

«We go to school and are taught reading, writing and arithmetic for [however many] hours a day and then taught that getting a good grade is better than getting a bad grade.»

In a series of secret memos sent back to Washington, described to me by several current and former US officials who have written or read them, diplomats reported that Russian intruders had broken into their homes late at night, only to rearrange the furniture or turn on all the lights and televisions, and then leave.

After reading everything that Buffett has ever written and then finding The Quest For Value, your site just puts it all together.

''... wittily written, pocket - sized guide... If you want to learn how to avoid the unpredictabilities of the stock market and the fees of middle men, then this book is well worth a read.»

Though many reading this article may believe that writing about human psychology is a strange topic when it comes to investing, wealth building, and wealth preservation, if we can not identify the psychological manipulations to which we fall victim, then we will not be able to prevent and avoid being manipulated into bad decisions or a state of inertia by the world's financial leaders.

If there is no one else in the business you trust to read through and correct the release, set to one side for a few hours after writing and then come back to it and read through thoroughly once again.

And then when you think about Reinhart and Rogoff's work, if you've read all the white papers that they've written prior to writing the book, one of the other conclusions that they draw is when debt gets to be about 100 % GDP it becomes problematAnd then when you think about Reinhart and Rogoff's work, if you've read all the white papers that they've written prior to writing the book, one of the other conclusions that they draw is when debt gets to be about 100 % GDP it becomes problematand Rogoff's work, if you've read all the white papers that they've written prior to writing the book, one of the other conclusions that they draw is when debt gets to be about 100 % GDP it becomes problematic.

Last year I wrote on Suven Life Sciences, also I did some secondary level maths to get a sense of returns an investor could get buying the business at then market cap (~ 2000 INR Crores or 400 Million USD) and exiting in 2024 See Snap shot below The base case CAGR didn't excite but reading management commentary compelled me to take a tracking position in model portfolio Over to this year One thing in AR gave me a Jeff Bezos moment For the first time management was sounding optimistic (this is coming from a management which is very conservative on record) Emphasis mine Management views on past Despite having grown the business every single year across the last five years, our business sustainability has been consistently questioned.

Friday I read an article at GenYMoney Don't Be Afraid of DIY Investing: It's Really Not That Scary about her sister and a nice mutual fund lady and then Saturday morning on A Greater Fool Big Alpha Garth turner wrote an article on how Canadians own $ 1,467,000,000,000 in High cost mutual funds.

Please read the article and then read what I wrote.

If you look at it now, and correct translation issues, it reads just like someone describing the stuff as it is, to the people writing it up then.

Religeous Books mainly write solutions and advices for the time they were announced.If you find / read something clearly not suitable for the curent time, it doesn't means that it lost its legitimacy completely.If it announce that a Prophet will come then you'll have to wait on this Prophet to have it altered to the curent time.

«but to take the time to read articles about things you do not believe and then to take the time to write comments that would alienate those who do believe for the purpose of somehow making them not believe seems pretty deluded to me»

If you are going to read the Bible then you should understand it exactly how it was written and that is confusing as it is...

Many of you said those of us of faith are deluded, but to take the time to read articles about things you do not believe and then to take the time to write comments that would alienate those who do believe for the purpose of somehow making them not believe seems pretty deluded to me.

State a negative and then instruct everyone to look up the «Mormon War» which is a dissertation written by Mormons to defend themselves against murdering 120 Methodists, men women and children at a place called «Mountain Meadow Massacre» (which should not be read on wikipedia — the Mormons have rewritten that as well).

@Jason, if you have not actually study the LDS Church or have actually read what they believe in, then shut up and stop writing nonsense.

But if I were told that what I am writing will be read in twenty years time by the children of today, and that those children will laugh, weep, and learn to love life as they read, why then I would devote the whole of my life and energy to it.

I like to think I can write a sentence now and then but then I read Luci Shaw, who effortlessly drops phrases like «the wide straps of dark clouds» or «silky shawl of air» or «rags of snow» and I just want to bow down.

No it has not been proven where did you see that on an alien special on a & e, Read up on it those other religions did not have Jesus as a Savior and did not have men writing 1000s of years apart talking about the same events, and phrophecizing about things that happened in later chapters written hundreds of years later... and in no bok any where was there a man like Jesus, who spoke the words that Jesus spoke and died for people who hated Him like Jesus did, and spoke the parabales and life lessons like Jesus did... look at what Jesus spoke... read it nowhere has there been a better teacher of life then in His woRead up on it those other religions did not have Jesus as a Savior and did not have men writing 1000s of years apart talking about the same events, and phrophecizing about things that happened in later chapters written hundreds of years later... and in no bok any where was there a man like Jesus, who spoke the words that Jesus spoke and died for people who hated Him like Jesus did, and spoke the parabales and life lessons like Jesus did... look at what Jesus spoke... read it nowhere has there been a better teacher of life then in His woread it nowhere has there been a better teacher of life then in His words.

I'd read Job and mourn for the children that were killed in the tornado, angry that they were written out and then replaced like possessions.

That's one of the things I was pointing out to someone who read a book on necromancy (long island medium) and was totally sold on everything the author wrote and was now at «peace» from reading about the endless cycles of death — i.e. soul coming back as such... dying then coming back again as another.

Starting with no grammar or dictionary, indeed not one written word to aid them, missionaries have learned the oral language, often without benefit of any interpreter — definitely the hard way — worked out an alphabet, reduced it to writing, prepared a grammar and dictionary, translated some portions into the newly written tongue, then had to teach the natives to read their own language in order to read the Bible.

Please, read even one well - written exposition of Catholicism before you go on a «pontificating» tour of what Catholics — supposedly — believed then and believe now.

Read the Bible in the NIV version and if don't see the prophecies written over 2000 years ago coming to pass in this day and age then look closer.

Why waste your time reading and then commenting at length on an article about a man you believe is imaginary written by a Pope you don't support?

You can also buy any other book you want right then and there and you can get people to sync up with your account to instantly share books and even interactively read by highlighting certain parts and writing notes in margins (which you can do with real books too I know, but this way won't ruin the books themselves).

And yes, I know that Nadia's husband stopped all comments of people and then he «accidentally» deleted them... and he boldly stated in writing that Nadia never read the comments nor did anyone «that loved her» ever share the comments with NadAnd yes, I know that Nadia's husband stopped all comments of people and then he «accidentally» deleted them... and he boldly stated in writing that Nadia never read the comments nor did anyone «that loved her» ever share the comments with Nadand then he «accidentally» deleted them... and he boldly stated in writing that Nadia never read the comments nor did anyone «that loved her» ever share the comments with Nadand he boldly stated in writing that Nadia never read the comments nor did anyone «that loved her» ever share the comments with Nadia.

If you can read and understand what I have written, then you would probably be able to deal with the book.

Then I red something like this, that you wrote almost four years ago and it encourages me, because you were speaking to my heart 4 years ago, and today I am here and reading it, because God saw fit to use you through the written word.

Last year, I read about a bunch of churches that decided the way to defeat evil in their town was to write Bible verses on wooden stakes and then go drive them the ground in certain areas with the hopes that this would drive away any territorial sprits and reclaim the area for God.

If you want to believe in your god, then more power to you, but don't make yourself look stupid by trying to refute scientific fact based on what someone told you or what you've read in an outdated book written to scare and control mankind though fantastical and highly embellished stories meant to inspire fear and obedience to ancient laws and beliefs.

I suggest you go back and read then try to comprehend what was written.

@nonono, I suggest that you actually step back, take a breath, and then read what I actually wrote — not what you wanted to see.

As I read Hartshorne, he maintains that «God is not spatially localized» (Schilpp, 545) and the meaning of this phrase is that God is everywhere — «God is not spatially separated from things» he has written (Schilpp, 545), and in a recent book he claims that deity, the universally immanent, is everywhere.5 Given this assumption Hartshorne is then able to say that since God, being everywhere, includes the regional standpoint of every temporal actual entity, he must intuit all occasions wherever they are as they occur» (Schilpp, 545).

To illustrate to you how vitally I have responded to what Schubert Ogden has to say, I found myself, while reading the galley proof of this book, reading a paragraph and then writing a page, either in response or in reaction to what he had said.

As Theophilus read this book, he was faced with a choice — to accept or deny the message, to live as he had up until then, or to change and live in light of what Luke wrote.

So I approach these words rather gingerly, feeling a bit as if Paul has written a private rant (one best read only by a trusted friend) and then hit «Reply — Send to All.»

and then the last post I read to be David saying, «The fact is that the bible is a collection of ancient timed documents written by men».

These were the verses we memorized out of our brand - new never - read - before Bibles and then wrote out on index cards to tape to our mirrors.

«My prayer is that you'll read these pages first curled up on your couch or in bed or in the bathtub,» she writes, «and then after that you'll bring it to the kitchen with you, turning corners of pages, breaking the spine, spilling red wine on it and splashing vinegar across the pages, that it will become battered and stained as you cook and chop and play, music loud and kitchen messy.

Then she told me it's damaging to our spiritual well being to read other books, even if written by Christians, and our only source of spiritual understanding should come from the Bible (the KJV at that).

So is Christianity really following Jesus or the writers of these gospels... oh and the Hebrew chapters has not clue who and when was it written... my suggestion is to spend sometime to know what you believe and what you want to believe... also if you really like to know about what real Jesus was, please read Quran... more eighty times the name of Jesus is mentioned in this book... where there is a chapter with Jesus» mother name «Mary» chapter 19, there is another chapter name «ale imran'the grand father of Jesus, chapter 3... and then compare what Jesus really was dear brother in mankind...

In other words, J. Denny Weaver's approach in this book is that he read a bunch of books on the atonement, and then wrote 5 - 10 pages summarizing the views and arguments of each book, which are then all compiled into this book on the atonement.