Sentences with phrase «then write your thoughts»

In such a case, think first — and then write your thoughts on a rough piece of paper.

Not exact matches

«And then when I finally wrote that scene in «Inglorious Basterds,» I was like, «Oh, I think I finally beat that one!»»
So when offered a chance to buy into the Tampa Bay Rays, then the worst franchise in baseball, the Wall Street veteran held his nose, thought of the upside and wrote a cheque.
«If you want to understand how people think and how and why they react, then this is a must read,» writes Weinschenk.
«To get to your number, you need to determine how much income you think you'll need to live on each year, based on your retirement lifestyle goals, then multiply that by the number of years you expect to be retired, writes certified financial planner Matt Shapiro.
Last year, when asked about balanced budget legislation he told the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance «I don't think writing something into law, and then expecting that future governments will be held by that, is realistic.»
«But the biggest difference I think is that before I could create one general resumé for a client; now, I can write one very good standard resumé, and then I'll coach them on the different techniques for how to update that resumé for each individual job application.»
«If we set up a partnership on a handshake and agree to split the business 70 - 30, and we then have a falling out because you think you are working harder than I am and deserve a bigger share of the profits, the law may say we are 50 - 50 partners unless we can clearly document in writing, for example a signed Form 1065, our intent to create an unequal split,» Ennico says.
Here I am, thinking I'm so busy, and then I hear what he's up to: producing three albums, designing a fashion line, learning a new instrument, writing a film.
And then when we, I think John Markoff wrote a story, discovering that we were testing and driving the vehicles in public, that's when all the car companies realized at the first level that something might happen.
Then everything gets updated through Schedule - It on Facebook - and I'm back to square one thinking about what to write about!
Andy Kessler wrote recently in the Wall Street Journal: The core of investing is quite simple: Determine what everyone else thinks, and then figure out in which direction they are wrong.
«Buy a diversified portfolio of blue - chip, dividend - paying, large - cap stocks (think Dow 30 type companies), and then write covered call options against them for recurring monthly income,» he said.
And then when you think about Reinhart and Rogoff's work, if you've read all the white papers that they've written prior to writing the book, one of the other conclusions that they draw is when debt gets to be about 100 % GDP it becomes problematic.
The problem I have is I keep getting great ideas and then starting a new one I think in a way writing three at the same time suits my personality because I get bored easily... but now I just have to finish them all
Finally, GM's quick repayment of the loans has whetted the appetite of some commentators (including DeCloet) for the ultimate repayment of the full government contribution. That would occur through the issuance of public equity by GM and Chrysler, creating a market for those stocks into which the government would presumably sell its shares. There is even some nefarious language in the rescue packages requiring the government to sell off its shares within specified, relatively aggressive timelines. The more I think about it, the less this makes sense — neither for the auto industry, nor for taxpayers. Why not hang onto the equity stake? If the companies recover and the equity gains market value, then the government will be able to claim that on its balance sheet (hence officially recouping the cost of its written - off contributions and creating a budgetary gain).
Obama wrote in his essay that «thoughts and prayers» follow mass shootings but then «the political debate spirals into acrimony and paralysis.»
You might want to re-read what Ted M. initially posted, and then your responses... to me at least... what you wrote was not an isomorphic argument that in any way refuted Ted's, and i think - Ace made reference to that as well as - Ted.
I think that most of the writing for the songs comes from personal experiences, a story will then be created around those experiences.
Then there's Sandy Newman, president of Voices for Progress, writing to John Podesta in 2012 when the HHS mandate was announced: «This whole controversy with the bishops opposing contraceptive coverage even though 98 % of Catholic women (and their conjugal partners) have used contraception has me thinking... There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic church.
But then I don't worship hope, or pray to it in the hope that it will intervene in something or other, or believe that it inspired people to write down its thoughts and laws in a set of books that encapsulate truth for all eternity, or believe that it sent its son to redeem us from sin.
The Bible you worship was written by the very church you think you know more then (new testament anyway).
When Amis writes, «It was the plane itself that was in frenzy, one felt, as it gunned and steadied and then smeared itself into the South Tower,» I only think: No, no, please don't.
Lisa is talking about what she thinks I believe, You say her post is well written and you would like to add to it, then you say your comments say nothing about what I believe.
I like to think I can write a sentence now and then but then I read Luci Shaw, who effortlessly drops phrases like «the wide straps of dark clouds» or «silky shawl of air» or «rags of snow» and I just want to bow down.
When my first thought was, «then why doesn't she write an Amazon review?»
Then he said, «Tell me, Mr. Coffin, what do you think I should write about in tomorrow's column?»
I totally agree with you that God can not be contained within human constructs and i commend and admire you for being bold enough to write it because it is not a popular opinion among many professing Christians but then i think you took Mark 13:21 out of context.
observer So you think the ancient Hebrews wrote in English then?
And if your effective recruiting tactic is using fear then obviously you are only getting sheep who do not want to think for themselves but would rather listen to the word of a two thousand year old book that was written by man.
In my opinion if someone thinks that a collection of books written by many people with hundreds of witnesses can be tampered with, then certainly scientific research and data can be tampered with as well.
But what so often happens is that we write a doctrinal statement, and then we think it is the truth, rather than recognizing that it is our interpretation of the truth of Scripture.
Therefore, if people think they can willfully go on sinning and the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross covers them, they are sadly mistaken, But if we sin (on purpose) out of weakness and imperfection then as 1 John writes, «My little children, I am writing these things to you so that you may not sin.
«Then they that feared the Lord spake one with another; and the Lord hearkened and heard, and a book of remembrance was written before Him, for them that feared the Lord and that thought upon His name.
The scientists involved then asked some of their subjects to do things that might change their beliefs, like write a paper arguing for the other side» the article mentions capital punishment» and found that people tend to change their beliefs and at the same time change what they thought were God's beliefs.
Also one night I said «The holy spirit is stupid» and then «it is» and I didn't know if it was an ocd thought or not but I said it during a prayer and I didn't feel sorry I told God that but I didn't feel worried that I didn't feel sorry but now, I'm kind of worried I have done blasphemy against the holy spirit but at the same time I don't and it feel like I'm not scared that I have but at the same time I'm crying when I'm writing this because I'm worried.
I am asking is it possible to sell your soul to the devil i before a few days in a program called two and a half men as i clicked the info button there was written that someone comes to know that he has sold his soul to the devil i don't remember who and what was exackly wriyten but after a few hours of that i kept on imagining how devil looked like and then thinking «i will sell your soul for 20 carats mo no shut up i will never sell you my soul oh god please help me «the thing i am scared of is that have i sold my soul to the devil have i?
But then again, in my past life, and sad to admit, I likely have said or at least thought what he put in writing.
In the light of that then, I think you are wrong to have written the rebuke you had to me about peoples motives as you intrpert my comments to adress.
Well, FAITH, there's the problem... that gibberish in the bible was just made up by «some guy» to keep the peasants behaving in a manner that whomever wrote it thought was a good way to behave... some of those guys were wise, yes, and there are benefits to following some of the «guidelines» set forth in the Bible... but it's a circular argument to use the Bible as a reason to have faith, because you have to first BELIEVE in the deity, THEN believe that the deity inspired the writings, THEN you can take the writings as «truth»... I'm two steps back, not believing in the deity at all (Yay, Atheists!
«Some people seem to think that I began by asking myself how I could say something about Christianity to children; then fixed on the fairy tale as an instrument; then collected information about child - psychology and decided what age group I'd write for; then drew up a list of basic Christian truths and hammered out «allegories» to embody them.
(Some articles I wrote in the «60s and «70s seem to me close to Stanley Hauerwas's position, but since then I have had reluctant second thoughts.)
After ten years of teaching medieval thought at Yale (mostly in the philosophy department), I was selected by the Lutheran World Federation to be a delegated observer to the Second Vatican Council (1962 - 65), and since then have done most of my research and writing in the context of participation in national and international ecumenical dialogue, mostly with Roman Catholics.
Write as much as you like until you have thought through the topic, then summarize it with 1,000 or 5,000 words.
@fred — the book of numbers is indeed referred as one of the books of moses, it wasn't written by him — there is actually (at least in the bible) 5 books of moses — in reality there is i think 25 books of moses — he didn't write them... oral traditions... they were write down in parts, then added together later.
When a good text comes home to him, «This,» he writes, «gave me good encouragement for the space of two or three hours»; or «This was a good day to me, I hope I shall not forget it»; or «The glory of these words was then so weighty on me that I was ready to swoon as I sat; yet not with grief and trouble, but with solid joy and peace»; or «This made a strange seizure on my spirit; it brought light with it, and commanded a silence in my heart of all those tumultuous thoughts that before did use, like masterless hell - hounds, to roar and bellow and make a hideous noise within me.
C S Lewis (in Letters to Malcolm, I think) wrote about how the best church meetings were those most like a hospital, where we first recognized our needs, gained that which brought remedy and then worshiped our God and Saviour as a result.
«Don't think that this blog and others are up here by accident, if you really want to do something then write congress, tell our leaders that they had better start listening to the majority of the people»
I lie in bed till ten, then take a stroll, or read or write a piece I think is droll.
So, then I revise my question: Why do you think the Bible written?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z