These are not perfect examples of the conflicting sides of
the theological argument of predestination, but they prove that examples can be found for trying to weigh the religious lessons of the plays in favor of Catholicism or Protestantism.
Certainly, there are many things I appreciate about John Calvin, Jacobus Arminius, Martin Luther, and the other Reformers, but I have too many differences with the main
theological arguments of each man to be comfortable identifying myself with the theological systems that bear their names.
Jason Byassee analyses
the theological arguments of a number of well known scholars who have converted to Roman Catholicism.
Not exact matches
Some
of their policy
arguments may have merit, but their
theological claims and priorities are more dubious.
It is an anthropological and
theological argument about the «creative subjectivity»
of workers and
of society, and about the freedom that is necessary for such creative subjectivity to flourish.
On the reading I propose, the Reformation schism was brought about instead by contingent human choices in a confused historical context defined less by clear and principled
theological argument (though that
of course was present) than by a peculiar and distinctively sixteenth - century combination
of overheated and ever - escalating polemics, cold - blooded Realpolitik, and fervid apocalyptic dreaming.
That is an
argument we are accustomed to hearing from ultra - traditionalists and some thinkers associated with the English edition
of the conservative
theological journal Communio.
Of course they may end up disagreeing with Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth about the moral significance of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even make our argument for inclusion»
Of course they may end up disagreeing with Bernard
of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth about the moral significance of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even make our argument for inclusion»
of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth about the moral significance
of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even make our argument for inclusion»
of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point
of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even make our argument for inclusion»
of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance
of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even make our argument for inclusion»
of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the
theological and ethical vision to even make our
argument for inclusion»?
The Catholic Church, to take one prominent institution devoted to the defense
of human life from conception until natural death, makes no «
theological»
argument about the nature
of the life in the womb.
Add to that the variety
of doctrines / Theologies within orthodox Christianity... with Consensus on a very small Core
of Truths: God Is, We are not God, Jesus Christ is the Messiah and Salvation is Through Faith / Belief in Him... there is much that lacks Consensus and there are mountains
of arguments and counter-
arguments for each doctrinal /
Theological position.
The
theological side
of the ledger was embodied by Harvey Cox's 1965 bestseller, The Secular City, with its
argument for a radically secularized Christianity in which the world sets the agenda for the Church.
They have also been influenced by the much - contested
argument of Lynn White, Jr., and others that the classical Western
theological tradition has proved ecologically problematic.
At one level this is an abstruse
argument about the finer points
of theological anthropology.
I myself am a catholic, but if anyone were to have a
theological argument, they have to have a deeper understanding
of all sides.
If you make good points, I may even comment, or notify my blog readers that I am changing my views because
of your compelling Scriptural and
theological arguments.
His belief that all
theological argument is (quite literally) «away with the fairies», and his optimism about a harmonious world where religion has withered away, are the doctrines
of new atheism.
His
argument in past articles that it is a good thing that the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America ordains women flies in the face
of church unity, orthodoxy, and good
theological thinking.
It argued that celibacy was outdated and unsuitable for contemporary Germany using a variety
of theological and social
arguments that were poorly conceived and constructed.
suffering, true sociality, as qualities
of the divine, along with radical differences (as we shall see) in the meanings ascribed to creation, the universe, human freedom, and in the
arguments for the existence
of God, those inclined to think that any view that is intimately connected with
theological traditions must have been disposed
of by this time should also beware lest they commit a non sequitur.
Having being on the receiving end
of the «man - hater» comment more times than I can count, seeing it listed as number one — in the form
of «I like white males so much I married one» — rubbed me the wrong way.Being called a man - hater is often unfairly used as a way to silence women and dismiss their
arguments outright, which is troubling, especially when it happens in the midst
of a
theological discussion.
The implications
of his
argument, however, also apply to Roman Catholic
theological education.
There is no principled legal or
theological argument that looks only to the good
of Christians over the interests
of others.
By contrast the second kind
of argument mounted under the banner
of process hermeneutics supports a claim that such - and - such a tenet
of process theology is «Biblical theology» in the sense
of being compatible with what some Biblical texts say on a
theological topic.
The works
of Don Browning, John Cobb or Lewis Mudge are a lively introduction to contemporary psychology, social thought and philosophy, as well as an
argument for their own constructive
theological positions.
Employing biblical,
theological, and philosophical
arguments, John Paul described the Christian conception
of man, and spoke about the inviolability
of human life, from conception to death.
and received quite an overwhelming response that varied between total agreement to
theological argument... one
of which this cartoon attempts to portray.
But it is a comment on the impoverished state
of theology today that her
arguments should be received with
theological seriousness.
She knows the heart
of God more than anyone else I know, and so while she may not know all the logical
arguments or Scripture passages for various
theological views, she senses rightness and wrongness in various
theological positions.
The deficiency in Jewett's commentary is connected mainly, however, to his enthusiastic embrace
of another stream
of scholarship, one that derives not from an interest in Paul's
theological argument as such but from a confidence in the ability
of historical - criticism to explain every aspect
of the letter in such fashion that it not only is intelligible within its first context (something everyone acknowledges is important), but is restricted in its significance only to that first context.
It was also a period
of disagreement and
theological argument.
As a seminary professor and author
of careful, nuanced
theological arguments (such as the classic Knowing God), he lacked the tract - writing flair
of his peer Stott.
To the neo-conservatives
of the moment, no such
theological strategy for embracing pluralism without forfeiting mind, negativity,
argument, rootedness, tradition, particularity can ever succeed.
If it is not our collective business to settle
theological arguments, why are we creating statutes and committing state resources in support
of a practice that rests on the opposite assumption — the assumption that there is no God, or at all events no God who would object to suicide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia?
Furnish, Allan Verhey, Robin Scroggs, Thomas Ogletree, Bruce Birch, Larry Rasmussen and others have pursued one or another
of these enterprises, but not within a comprehensive
theological argument.
Leaving God unnamed does not make their
argument any less
theological, especially when they claim that the elements
of complex design they have observed in nature are present because
of the activity
of their unnamed intelligent designer.
These statements employ a wide variety
of theological arguments.
It seems to me that a lot
of theological and philosophical
arguments come from people trying to say the same thing in different words.
Sermons, Bible studies, perhaps even a
theological argument may have been a part
of the process.
I thus conclude, within the oversimplification which is excusable for this kind
of capsule
argument, that apologetics or evangelism should not be thought
of as constituting a distinctive mode
of theological discourse for which we would need a specific definition
of the place
of the Bible.
And that is the point
of my
argument; the standard
theological version
of process philosophy — Whitehead with God — leads me to ask such questions, leads me to wonder why such senseless, absurd disasters have plagued us at every step
of our history, and this counts strongly against the centered version
of process metaphysics.
All this brings us back to some
of the earlier posts on this thread: Instead
of memorizing biblical verses and studying
theological arguments, shut off the noise in your mind, and just listen.
For the British, it was the actual experience
of slavery in some
of its most brutal forms in the West Indies that precipitated thinking hard about slavery, which then precipitated biblical and
theological arguments against it, which then led to political action.»
This is the
argument that is offered as a
theological justification for the minister in the dominant roles
of enabler and conflict manager.
Badly written, pretentious and irresponsible in its claims and
arguments, wholly lacking in historical sophistication and mastery
of its sources, it nevertheless remains our only
theological correlation
of the original religious ground
of Christianity with the higher religious expressions
of Oriental mysticism.
They embed the evolutionary data, often unconsciously, in a purely physicalist worldview, taking Darwinian science to be the ultimate explanation
of life's complexity They have no room for any
theological «
argument to design» since to them it is clearly blind physical processes alone, and not God, that account for what seems to us humans to be so design - like in finches» beaks and dinosaurs» plates.
The usually gentle Gustafson accused churches
of failure to recognize the complexities
of social issues, neglect
of «sound
theological and ethical
arguments» and dogmatic refusal to recognize «the...
The orthodox manualists
of either Roman Catholic or Protestant Scholasticism were nothing if not clear about their mostly deductive methods for
theological argument.
I continue to be troubled by the structure
of David Jones»
argument regarding the ethics
of cremation.Let's review his conclusion: After reviewing some
of the key historical, biblical, and
theological considerations that have been a part
of the moral discussion
of cremation within the....
«8 «There are flat contradictions between some
of his
theological arguments and his own doctrines and behavior,» she says.9
It turns out, however, that the managerial visions
of mutuality are presumed in this
argument before the
theological mystery
of the Trinity is explored.