Not exact matches
However, some of the smaller institutions affiliated with the
church may be
in position to bring about
change, and
theological seminaries are among the most important of them.
And it would be simply faulty
theological formation, and rashness, if a Christian were to assert that because the
Church can
change or has
changed a mutable positive
Church law, it is also
in a position, or obliged, to alter a law which it knows is divine and unchangeable, simply because it has a certain material affinity with mutable canon law.
It does not mean that anything has
changed in terms of the
theological and ecclesial distance between the Catholic
Church and Pentecostal or evangelical ecclesial bodies.
Only someone who overlooks the fact that this answer itself has a real history which is a history of the reality reflected on as well as of the reflection itself, can think that the
Church with its principles, because they too can be given concrete form, is always able to follow directly on the heels of what is new
in the
changing course of history and that only by its own fault and failure could the
Church lag behind events
in its
theological reflection on morals.
Since, as well as before my
change, my
theological thinking centers and has centered
in its emphasis upon the majesty of God, the eschatological character of the whole Christian message, and the preaching of the gospel
in its purity as the sole task of the Christian
church.
Again there were not only profound
changes in communication, but also
church organization,
theological teachings, and worship
changed.
Changes in relation to production, political organization, ideological struggles continue to raise a number of questions for which the traditional
theological and ethical repertoire of the confessional
churches may have little or nothing ready - made to say.
While the Evangelicals» concern for the social problems of their day was mainly practical and philanthropic, trying to effect
change through Acts of Parliament and by giving relief to those
in need, the response of the
Church of England's High
Church party, known as the Tractarians or Oxford Movement, was more
theological.
The present essay, first produced as a
theological memorandum
in 1942 at the request of the Oberkirchenrat of the Lutheran
Church of Württemberg, is reproduced here without any important
changes.
Co., 1978); Thomas C. Campbell and Yoshio Fukuyama, The Fragmented Layman: An Empirical Study of Lay Attitudes (Philadelphia: Pilgrim Press, 1970); James D. Davidson, «Religious Belief as an Independent Variable,» Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 11 (1972): 65 - 75; James D. Davidson, «Religious Belief as a Dependent Variable,» Sociological Analysis 33 (1972): 81 - 94; James D. Davidson, «Patterns of Belief at the Denominational and Congregational Levels,» Review of Religious Research 13 (1972): 197 - 205; David R. Gibbs, Samuel A. Miller, and James R. Wood, «Doctrinal Orthodoxy, Salience and the Consequential Dimension,» Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 12 (1973): 33 - 52; William McKinney, and others, Census Data for Community Mission (New York: Board for Homeland Ministries, United
Church of Christ, 1983), part of a denomination - wide study of census data relevant to each congregation
in the United
Church of Christ; David O. Moberg, `'
Theological Position and Institutional Characteristics of Protestant Congregations: An Explanatory Study,» Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 9 (1970): 53 - 58; Wade Clark Roof, Community and Commitment; Thomas Sweetser, The Catholic Parish: Shifting Membership
in a
Changing Church (Chicago: Center for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1974).
[26] The Sixth Forum on Bilateral Dialogues held
in October 1994,
in its Report: International Bilateral Dialogues, 1992 - 1994 (Faith and Order Paper No. 168)(Geneva: WCC Publications, 1995), observed that where openness to reception and renewal exits, significant
changes in the life and mission of the
church occur through, among other things, «contact
in theological formation with the broader heritage of the
church through the ages.
Karl Barth,
in his 1939 report to the readers of The Christian Century on «How My Mind Has Changed,» wrote the following concerning his theological pilgrimage during the 1930s: «In these years I had to learn that Christian doctrine, if it is to merit its name and if it is to build up the Christian church in the world as she must needs be built up, has to be exclusively and conclusively the doctrine of Jesus Christ - of Jesus Christ as the living Word of God spoken to us men.&raqu
in his 1939 report to the readers of The Christian Century on «How My Mind Has
Changed,» wrote the following concerning his
theological pilgrimage during the 1930s: «
In these years I had to learn that Christian doctrine, if it is to merit its name and if it is to build up the Christian church in the world as she must needs be built up, has to be exclusively and conclusively the doctrine of Jesus Christ - of Jesus Christ as the living Word of God spoken to us men.&raqu
In these years I had to learn that Christian doctrine, if it is to merit its name and if it is to build up the Christian
church in the world as she must needs be built up, has to be exclusively and conclusively the doctrine of Jesus Christ - of Jesus Christ as the living Word of God spoken to us men.&raqu
in the world as she must needs be built up, has to be exclusively and conclusively the doctrine of Jesus Christ - of Jesus Christ as the living Word of God spoken to us men.»
Konrad Raiser, now General Secretary of the World Council of
Churches, uses it to describe, a
change in theological perspective which affects the whole range of ecumenical work.1 His colleague and former student Martin Robra applies it specifically to a
change in perspective on social ethics
in World Council work.2 K.C. Abraham describes it as a
change in theological and ethical perspective brought about by the participation of the Third World
in the ecumenical movement.3 They all make important points.
The «functions» for which
theological schools are to prepare future clergy are determined by the expectations of the membership of «mainline» white Protestant
churches, and
in general that membership expects ministerial leadership to be «successful» and «efficient» (Brown, 55)
in helping them to preserve their social status and cultural roles
in a nation that is entering a future marked by unprecedented urbanization, technological
change, and massive social planning (Kelly, 230 - 31).
The
changes in the liturgy are rooted
in the
theological stirrings after World War I: the gradual breakdown of neo-Scholastic metaphysics, the beginning of Catholic biblical scholarship, and a return to the study of the
church fathers.
These «
theological» experiences of ours are bound to bring about some fundamental
changes in the way we do Christian theology, understand the nature and task of the Christian
church, and paractice our Christian faith
in Asia.
That fact may well account for the apparent growing
theological consensus, but it would seem to be the lasting effect of the charismatic movement
in the Reformed
churches and one that probably will not
change in the future.