Not exact matches
The trinity was a
theological development from a series
of councils in the first 400 years or so
of Church
development of doctrine.
, we wrote: «Throughout the 1970s, 80s and 90s Faith movement carried the flag in the UK for [orthodox] doctrinal catechesis... made [even less fashionable] by our calls for a real
development of doctrine and
theological expression... There are now many voices championing orthodoxy... [which] are greatly to be welcomed.»
Doctrinal orthodoxy and loyalty to the Magisterium were not fashionable causes, and they were made less so by our calls for a real
development of doctrine and a
theological expression
of Catholicism to revindicate orthodoxy in the age
of science.
For this reason alone, I regard John Henry Newman's The
Development of Christian
Doctrine as the most important
of all modern Catholic
theological works, or at least, the most significant until Teilhard de Chardin's The Phenomenon
of Man.
Such a history does not only exist because a very great deal
of time and
theological development and clarification was needed in some cases before the Church's awareness
of its belief had finally fought its way to a clear realization that such and such a definite
doctrine of the Church is really contained in divine revelation, is a genuine expression
of what has always been globally believed or an obligatory defence against heretical misinterpretation
of what has been handed down.
The disputes centering around such passages had a far - reaching effect on the course
of the
development of many
theological doctrines which occupied the minds
of Muslims for generations.
Thus did Vatican II vindicate Newman's great work on the
development of doctrine, which grew from a
theological method that brought history, and indeed life itself, back into play as sources
of reflection and growth in our understanding
of God's revelation.
Enns does not know this Tradition and, although he recognises a kind
of «
development of doctrine» within the Bible itself, he does not have the
theological tools to set his own thinking in dialogue with the living theology
of the Church.
If, as a body, they assume the intrinsic goodness
of religious freedom and the intrinsic evil
of slavery, perhaps that is because the
development of Christian
doctrine has rightly tended in that direction — and thus steered between dangers that are
theological as well as political.