Just like someone who is a gossip is sinning — and trying to say it is
a theological difference of opinion.
It is not one of simple preference or
theological difference of opinion.
Not exact matches
I know I have a gift for leadership
of some sort — my personal
opinion is this will never be realized again in the church environment — because
of theological differences alone.
The
theological views
of Philo, Plotinus, Augustine, St. Thomas, Spinoza, Leibniz, Kant, Schleiermacher, Royce, the Hindu Sankara, present
differences that are striking enough, but all
of them agree, or fail clearly to deny, that God is a being «absolutely infinite» (Spinoza's phrase) or every way complete and perfect, and there seems little rational place for significant variations
of opinion in a doctrine so completely determined as the doctrine
of complete perfection.
Nor can I report the
differences of the
theological opinions which have since emerged on this subject in the various Churches.
Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many
theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds
of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora
of opinion on the evolving world
of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the
differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..
Again, the important task
of adjudicating
differences of opinion on other
theological issues within the evangelical community is being largely preempted (recent meetings of the Evangelical Theological Society, for example, have often become one - topic con
theological issues within the evangelical community is being largely preempted (recent meetings
of the Evangelical
Theological Society, for example, have often become one - topic con
Theological Society, for example, have often become one - topic convocations).
The linchpin
of Professor Rawls» criticism
of the «rationalist believers» was his claim that they deny what he called «the fact
of reasonable pluralism,» namely, in circumstances
of political and religious freedom it is to be expected that there will emerge serious
differences of opinion among reasonable people on important moral and
theological questions.
Mainliners may be predisposed to this
opinion because
of theological and political
differences between the two groups.
At a deeper
theological level, it is worth noting that 11
of the 12 members
of the Catholic faculty are priests, and there is a fundamental
difference of opinion at the bottom
of this dispute over what is called Kirchlichkeit — perhaps best rendered «churchliness.»
But it should now be clear to white and black churchmen alike that the
theological differences between them are very real, and that they form barriers which, in my
opinion at least, are insurmountable for the present generation unless,
of course, white churches are ready to make a radical commitment to the fight for justice on behalf
of the oppressed.