Jeremy I really appreciate the way that you don't want to just settle for pre-fabricated
theological frameworks in which to study the Bible.
Not exact matches
The Faith movement has this principle at the heart of its approach to the formation of young Catholics, seeking to foster an inquisitive approach to the faith, just as
in the natural sciences, and to develop such intellectual curiosity within a
theological framework that is faithful to Christ's Magisterium and to our understanding of the created universe.
When we by contrast present Scripture
in the first instance
in terms of some particular
theological framework or
in the light of specialized or critical issues, we not only fail to address the questions that trouble us, but we may also place a barrier between the reader and the text of Scripture.
There is a way of reading Barth that leads to a radical separation of faith from the world, so that the world,
in all of its secularity, can be affirmed just as it is, without trying to impose a thick
theological framework on it.
The speaker's drama
in preaching is both a search for a language of lived experience and for a way of speaking sermonic texts that are «believable» at a time when coherent,
theological frameworks have collapsed.
Not the posture of value - detachment and apolitical objectivism but the articulation of one's social location, interpretive strategies and theoretical
frameworks are appropriate
in such a rhetorical paradigm of
theological studies.
The search and struggle for recovering the
theological voice of women by changing the discursive
frameworks of theology
in general and biblical studies
in particular has absorbed my own thought and work
in the past decade.
None of these questions can be answered outside of a
theological framework of Christian belief
in a personal God who has made us for fellowship with himself and for obedience to his will, who cares for us as individuals, and within the channels of his orderly world gives heed to our petitions.
That contemporary evangelical ideas of social ethics are rooted
in outside
theological / ideological
frameworks can perhaps be illustrated by comparing the four positions outlined above with that of California politics over the last twenty years.
So ingrained was the non-Christian Aristotelian
framework of reality
in the
theological discourse of the Church at the time, that it proved difficult to conceive letting go of it and to use a different cosmology (Copernican) as a new paradigm for
theological reflection on the same truths.
This approach puts the issue
in a
theological framework.
The theology of the cross, that is to say, provides the
theological courage and the conceptual
framework to hold the language
in place.
Perhaps I could say now
in retrospect that my being drawn to the study and development of a process mode of thinking may also have been related to an unconscious awareness that it offered me not only a more viable
theological and philosophical
framework than any other, but also an opportunity to integrate my identity as a woman within a religious
framework.
In the process, Barr exposes other foibles of more recent efforts to maintain that tradition of interpretation: a tendency toward specialization in historical and linguistic cognate fields that avoids theological issues and ironically reduces them to matters archaeological and historical; a style of «maximal conservativism» that approximates earlier positions taken on dogmatic grounds by a current process of selectively appropriating the most conservative elements of a variety of more critical positions; a surprising (and again ironic) tendency to offer «naturalistic» reinterpretations of the miraculous within the highly supernaturalistic inerrancy framework; and so o
In the process, Barr exposes other foibles of more recent efforts to maintain that tradition of interpretation: a tendency toward specialization
in historical and linguistic cognate fields that avoids theological issues and ironically reduces them to matters archaeological and historical; a style of «maximal conservativism» that approximates earlier positions taken on dogmatic grounds by a current process of selectively appropriating the most conservative elements of a variety of more critical positions; a surprising (and again ironic) tendency to offer «naturalistic» reinterpretations of the miraculous within the highly supernaturalistic inerrancy framework; and so o
in historical and linguistic cognate fields that avoids
theological issues and ironically reduces them to matters archaeological and historical; a style of «maximal conservativism» that approximates earlier positions taken on dogmatic grounds by a current process of selectively appropriating the most conservative elements of a variety of more critical positions; a surprising (and again ironic) tendency to offer «naturalistic» reinterpretations of the miraculous within the highly supernaturalistic inerrancy
framework; and so on.
We reduce it to insignificance and remove its ontological and
theological sting, by construing it as though it said that man's body was taken from the earth and
in doing so we think of «body» as meaning just what fits into the
framework of our standard and superficial ideas, and as something that has nothing to do with the «soul».
There follows a philosophical and
theological chapter
in which I outline a
framework of thought and action that I call Christian biopolitics.
«I would think a more adequate line of
theological exploration than Altizer's would entail the working out of an understanding of Christ and God that views them
in a
framework of process, but understood
in such a way that process involves cumulative enrichment and fulfillment and not simply dialectical reversal.
Thus, to sum it up, I should think that a more adequate line of
theological exploration would entail the working out of an understanding of Christ and God that views them
in a
framework of process, but understood
in such a way that process involves cumulative enrichment and fulfillment and not simply dialectical reversal.
In particular, I believe that secular studies can benefit from the framework of values and the wisdom about man's ultimate commitments generated over the centuries in the experiences of prophets and saints and articulated in fresh, contemporary language by critical theological inquir
In particular, I believe that secular studies can benefit from the
framework of values and the wisdom about man's ultimate commitments generated over the centuries
in the experiences of prophets and saints and articulated in fresh, contemporary language by critical theological inquir
in the experiences of prophets and saints and articulated
in fresh, contemporary language by critical theological inquir
in fresh, contemporary language by critical
theological inquiry.
These discoveries may render out of date some of the details of older
theological dogmas, may force their restatement
in new intellectual
frameworks.
Here we have an example of how it has been possible, both
in theological and practical terms, to uphold the validity of the alternate means of understanding and practising baptism within the wider
framework of the unity of the church.
Porter is unpersuasive
in her repeated claims that the figures under study tended to use the
theological framework provided by Scripture, nature, and reason merely to legitimate the prevailing but often unquestioned views of their culture.
Even
in circles which are open to the new evangelical thrust for social action, there has been no critical look at this
theological framework.
One of the genuine alternatives
in our time to the «dialectical» or «Continental» theology as a constructive advance upon liberalism is the mode of
theological thinking which seeks to reinterpret the force and meaning of the Christian faith within the new intellectual
framework that is being provided by modern metaphysics.
Within that
framework, I have said, it is not obvious that the Hick - Hasker deity; who disguised its existence from us while freely giving us
theological freedom with all its dangers, is preferable to a God who would be Calvinistic
in power but Whiteheadian
in goodness (so that the world would truly be the paradise that traditional theists long for
in Heaven but so dread on Earth).
Thus the affirmation of a single deity containing three persons, the second of whom was the eternal person of «God the Son,» was a clear and consistent
theological explanation of the divinity of Jesus
in the
framework of their philosophy.
The more serious effort to concern itself primarily with ethical rather than
theological problems, as the followers of Bonhoeffer have done, has led them outside the
framework of biblical language and judgment, and has tended to dissolve their religious answers either into personal morality or social activism which, while serious
in its intention, has made them weathercocks turning freely
in the cultural winds.
It is believed that experience and expertise will come
in the field, but as
in law, the underlying philosophical and
theological framework for the practice can only be taught during the three year seminary period.