Her earliest work on the relationship between ritual purity and holiness, and her later work on the true literary and
theological meaning of the Book of Leviticus do much to counter the neo - Freudian view that Judeo - Christianity is based on a primitive, superstitious, patriarchal, taboo ridden ideology.
Not exact matches
This
means that the reader can be assured that the
book is pure
of sectarian or
theological contamination as it follows the by - now quaint - sounding criteria
of a history objective and scientific.
The background assumption
of this
book means, finally, that so far as its content is concerned the best hope
of saying things
of general relevance to persons involved in all types
of theological schooling today lies in making some particular and fairly concrete proposals that may turn out to be directly pertinent only to a few types
of theological schools but may provoke and help other persons in other types
of schools to think through these issues for themselves.
Although there are various articles and
books showing what I have called systematic
theological concerns, philosophical criteria are used, usually exclusively, when dealing with questions
of meaning and truth, criteria which are respectable in the academy.3 Process Christology, for example, usually follows Schleiermacher, and tends as a result to be embarrassed by strong exclusivist claims.
Steve... whatever our position is with respect to the
book, does that
mean the end
of knowledge be it biological, geological, cosmological and even
theological?
The latter part
of the
book provides sustained
theological reflection on what Christians
mean when they talk about God's providence.
For, the first chapters
of the
Book of Genesis were never
meant to be taken as history or science, as «eyewitness» accounts, either
of God or
of someone impossibly «interviewing» God, but as a spiritual,
theological, and mystical statement about God's relationship with the world; as an «aetiological myth,» to use Rahner's phrase, that provides an explanation, based on the human author's contemporary experience,
of how things must have gotten to be the way we see them.