If there is scepticism about external reality, why use creation as one's
theological point of departure?
Not exact matches
Scripture is the primary source and guideline «as the constitutive witness to biblical wellsprings
of our faith,» but tradition, experience and reason also function as sources and guidelines, and in practice «
theological reflection may find its
point of departure» in any
of them.
Meanwhile, in 1981, in an innovative paper presented at United
Theological College, Bangalore, Arvind P. Nirmal found a
point of irreversible
departure «Towards a Sudra Theology» which had eventually led him to be the father
of dalit theology.3 Nirmal himself used to recall the lores and stories from the Marathi dalit oral tradition and admitted that he has been greatly influenced by them in his understanding
of God.
To transcend one's «own ideological
points of departure» means, in a
theological context, to be carried artistically beyond one's own take on the ethical and the
theological — a transcendence authorized by the text but much resisted by the church.
Instead they focused upon the subjective perceptions and internal anxieties
of the human person as their
point of departure, which for Jaki was all very well as a second step in
theological dialogue but not the first.