Not exact matches
Is it simply that the radicalism is expressed in an unholy synthesis of political
and theological rhetoric (a perennial temptation, incidentally, upon which both the Religious
Left and the Religious
Right need to reflect)?
Evangelicalism, in this paradigm, is now no longer a distinct
theological tradition (i.e., «Reformation Christianity,» though it tends to be dominated by a «Reformed» articulation of Christian faith) or a particular piety
and ethos (as it tended to be in classical evangelicalism) but has become a
theological position staked out between conservative neo-orthodoxy
and fundamentalism on a spectrum from
left to
right that is defined essentially by degrees of accommodation to modernity.
Thus we have in this volume a brief but provocative dialogue between the
theological left and the
theological right on the topic of play.
The irony here is that one of the conscious aims of that statement had been to make welcome room for the evangelicals within the inclusive Methodist
theological enterprise — even while it was also trying to wall off the extreme dogmatists from the «
right»
and the barn - burners from the «
left.»
This line of separation has become less acute than it was fifty years ago when the famous Dayton trial over the
right to teach evolution in the public schools took place,
and in the same year of 1925 Harry Emerson Fosdick had to
leave the pastorate of the First Presbyterian Church of New York City because of his
theological views.
When Christian theologians expose the full implications of
theological postures recently assumed,
and when they critically examine humanism without the prism of gross misinterpretations, it will be recognized that the formidable chasm is between the
right (theocentric)
and left (humanocentric) wings of theism, not between the latter
and religious humanism.
The situation in Europe, including Britain, is more nuanced than that in North America, largely because Europe's Muslim populations have a longer
and more established social
and political history in nations where Muslims (of the
theological left,
right and center) are represented by sophisticated networks of» mosques
and political NGOs that defend the
rights of Muslims
and shape their participation in civic life, including the introduction of Islamic law for civil cases.
1920 Rev. Curtis Lee Laws first uses term «fundamentalist» 1920 Prohibition 1920 19th Amendment gives women
right to vote 1921 Latin American Mission (Harry
and Susan Strachan) 1923 J. Gresham Machen publishes Christianity
and Liberalism 1924 Evangelical
Theological College, later called Dallas
Theological Seminary 1925 Scopes «Monkey» Trial 1927 First «talking» motion picture 1928 Henrietta Mears becomes Director of Christian Education at First Presbyterian Church of Hollywood 1929 Stock market crash begins Great Depression 1929 Fundamentalists
leave Princeton to form Westminster
Theological Seminary
The
left tablet of the ten commandments presupposes the
right tablet
and the second commandment depends upon the first
and the
theological context of the New Testament witness to Christ.
Indeed, he says, «I could not see that I had any
right to
leave the community in which I was baptized, in which I learned to believe the catholic faith from the heart,
and in which I had my
theological vocation.»
This is the fallacy of contemporary
left - wing politics: you kids want the «gravy» of fundamentally
theological entities (
right and wrong) without any of the «grief» of maintaining coherent
theological narratives — you rely on little more than coercion
and force, often enacted against children, in order to keep them on the «
right path.»