Referencing a text by the 18th century American theologian Jonathan Edwards, the work meditates upon an American orthodox
theological tradition which perceives the natural world as clear evidence of the Divine and as a series of sequential «images», each of which is pre-figured in the bible.
A theological tradition which «believes in Jesus» encourages the believer to construct the faith - image of this Jesus, an image made up as a result of many different influences: the preaching and teaching of the Church, the reading of the gospels and of devotional literature, the lives and ideals of influential individuals, and so on.
Lutheran congregations provide a good Petri dish for studying the megachurch impact, because Lutherans have a distinct
theological tradition which they express in a particular liturgical style of worship.
The theological tradition which tries to separate the suffering of Jesus» humanity from his divinity simply misses the decisive point about the atonement.
Nevertheless I am convinced that what has been said is on the right lines and that it provides a kind of summary of the best insight and interpretation in
the theological tradition which we have inherited.
Black theology's rootage in the tradition of that other great protest, schism, and reformation which produced the racially separate African - American congregations determines that it is not at all committed to that predominantly white - Western
theological tradition which Hartshorne calls «classical theism.»
There is a powerful
theological tradition which settles this matter of the divine motivation in another way.
The theological traditions which constitute America's moral heritage argue that personal value is bestowed, endowed, given by the Creator.
Not exact matches
The base of the tree (
which is, I would note from a
theological perspective, an entirely pagan
tradition) was made up of eight large books, representing the eight nights of Hannukah.
Mainline Protestants (Methodists, Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and the like) and evangelical / fundamentalist Protestants (an umbrella group of conservative churches including the Pentecostal, Baptist, Anabaptist, and Reformed
traditions) not only belong to distinctly different kinds of churches, but they generally hold distinctly different views on such matters as
theological orthodoxy and the inerrancy of the Bible, upon
which conservative Christians are predictably conservative.
Since young adults perceive evangelical Christianity to be... «unconcerned with social justice», it's a shame that more evangelical churches don't know about the Just Faith program,
which provides «opportunities for individuals to study and be formed by the justice
tradition articulated by the Scriptures, the Church's historical witness,
theological inquiry and Church social teaching» (from jusfaith.org/programs).
Much of the distinctive way in
which the Wesleyan
tradition uses Scripture is wrapped up in
theological context and method.
In his stunning new book Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal
Tradition (Harvard University Press, 1983), Harold J. Berman argues that the roots of modern universalistic principles of law, morality, science and scholarship derive from essentially
theological insights
which are now in peril of being lost by neglect.
Kasper thinks that the Catholic
theological tradition doesn't talk about mercy enough and that the classical concept of God,
which sees God as perfect and unchanging, is «pastorally... a catastrophe.»
Theological hermeneutics should have a «spiral structure» in
which there is ongoing circulation between culture,
tradition, and biblical text, each enriching the understanding of the other.
It has become something of a sport for folks in the evangelical, neo-Reformed
tradition to take to the internet to draw out the «boundaries of evangelicalism,» boundaries
which inevitably fall around their own particular
theological distinctions and
which seem to grow narrower and narrower with every blog post on the topic.
He is at work in time, and it is just this
which the
theological tradition, conditioned by neo-platonic metaphysics, has never been able to encompass.
If we are to speak of extremes — without pejorative intent — at the other end of the spectrum would be those services planned by administrators (whether presidents, deans or chaplains)
which have survived as full - blown Christian liturgies expressing the
theological tradition behind the institution's establishment.
The global culture
which the present suggests and the future demands impels everyone — every individual, every group, every culture, every religious and
theological tradition — to recognize the plurality within each self, among all selves, all
traditions, all cultures in the.
So I find that the Anglican
tradition,
which came into existence for political rather than
theological reasons, works for me.
But there are also altruistic reasons (
which some people from differing
theological and secular
traditions share) for promoting concern for the common good and focusing on the welfare of the most vulnerable.
Any attempt to break loose from the path set out by Schleiermacher and to find a way in
which to make the transcendent God our subject, rather than some aspect of ourselves, could be called an apophantic theology, standing as it does in that
tradition of paradox or dialectic that marked the Cappadocian theologians and has always been a part of the
theological tradition.
Many felt that the
theological task of India need not be the preserve of the «Brahmanic
Tradition» within the Indian Church,
which had always used «intuition, inferiority oriented approach» to theologising.14 Dalit theologians were of the opinion that the
theological and cultural domination of Brahmanic
traditions within Indian Christianity, ignoring the rich cultural and religious experience of the Dalits had to be ignored, if not rejected completely.
For Berger, then, the
theological enterprise is best understood as a process of «induction,» in
which one mediates and interprets personal experience in conversation with one's religious
tradition.
Such a
theological and ecclesiological position has a long cultural heritage in Christian
tradition, but it must not imperialize Biblical interpretation by becoming the sole authoritative stance from
which the Biblical witness is read.
I need more than the resources of Bible,
theological tradition, and my own commitments if I am to understand my faith and the world in
which it is set; I also need the ethical insights of my secular colleagues, the political and psychological analyses of my friends and foes, and the prophetic jab of nonchurchmen whose degree of commitment so often puts my own to shame.20
In any event, the point of this chapter, intended to prepare the way for further discussion of what I have styled «another» (and I am convinced a better)
theological approach, is simply to insist that we can only be loyal to our ancestors in the Christian
tradition, but above all loyal to the chief stress in the faith
which that
tradition has conveyed to us, if and when and as we are ready to put stress on love's centrality — and to use that as our key to the whole
theological enterprise.
Evangelicals must take with increased seriousness the variety of
traditions from
which they spring, for here is one major source of conflict in their present
theological formulations.
Having listened to these positions and ob - served the importance
which theological traditions play in their formulations, I will then look for direction as to how a renewed investigation of the Biblical data might proceed.
We have said something about the place of the Bible in the living Christian
tradition which preachers represent and for
which they function; we have discussed a few of the problems or questions
which are raised both for preachers and for people; and we have tried to sum up the
theological and moral implications of the gospel as these have been worked out in the
tradition down the centuries.
David Hart has noted that there is a long
theological tradition, particularly in Eastern Orthodoxy, that «makes no distinction, essentially, between the fire of hell and the light of God's glory, and that interprets damnation as the soul's resistance to the beauty of God's glory, its refusal to open itself before the divine love,
which causes divine love to seem an exterior chastisement» (The Beauty of the Infinite, 399).
Shortage of space prevents us from giving a survey of the doctrine of freedom as it emerges from the history of dogma and theology, or to discuss in detail the
theological statements about the nature of freedom
which are found in Scripture,
tradition and the pronouncements of the magisterium of the Church.
In an ambitious project of precisely this nature, William Everett and T.J. Bachmeyer work out an elaborate paradigm in
which they interrelate three
theological approaches — cultic (Catholic), prophetic (Protestant), and ecstatic (Anabaptist)-- with three sociological
traditions — functionalism (unitary view of society), dualism (conflictual), and pluralism (balance of powers)-- with three psychological viewpoints — conflictual, fulfillment, and equilibrium.
In spending time with Christians from a variety of church
traditions this week, I was reminded of the degree to
which theological and ecclesiological diversity strengthens the Body of Christ.
Thus the doctrine of the divine Triunity developed first in very simple terms, then more in the form in
which it has become part of the
theological tradition of the Christian community.
Reviewing the exegetical search of the early writers involves, then, for those of us who have come into the inheritance of these
traditions, the responsibility not only to interact with these inherited
traditions, but also to interpret these in the context of the «extratextual hermeneutics that is slowly emerging as a distinctive Asian contribution to
theological methodology [
which] seeks to transcend the textual, historical, and religious boundaries of Christian
tradition and cultivate a deeper contact with the mysterious ways in
which people of all religious persuasions have defined and appropriated humanity and divinity.»
Ultimately, it represents the self - liquidation of theology and of the institutions in
which the
theological tradition is embodied» (Peter Berger, Rumor of Angels, Doubleday, 1969, p. 26).
Still another factor to be adduced in a consideration of the nature of the synoptic gospel
tradition is the success with
which this
tradition has been approached from the viewpoint of its exhibiting the
theological concerns of the evangelists.
The constant presence of this mystery to the world and to human existence is equivalent to what the Christian
theological tradition has variously called original, universal, natural or general revelation,
which it distinguishes from the special or decisive revelation given in Christ.
Hence professional studies serve to introduce them to the religious
tradition which is presupposed by the inherited
Theological Encyclopedia.
Teaching people to think out of a
theological tradition,
which catechetical instruction at its best should do, is only one small step toward this kind of community.
Those of us who dismiss the conservative
tradition as being represented by Billy Graham or by the stance of Christianity Today ten or 5 years ago might, for example, take a look at Richard Mouw's Political Evangelism,
which is typical of a new breed of
theological writing from a very conservative, though hardly fundamentalist, biblical perspective, or God in Public, by William Coats, Episcopal chaplain at the University of Wisconsin.
Thus I begin my admission or confession of the approach, the materials, and the methods
which I believe to be necessary in the indispensable job of re-conceiving the last things, along with re-conceiving the totality of the Christian
theological tradition.
In 1979, a consultation «inaugurated» by the Faith and Order Commission of the World Council of Churches,
which was held at Louisville, Kentucky, at the Southern Baptist
Theological Seminary, brought together representatives of the paedo - baptist and believer - baptist
traditions «to reflect on some kind of consensus in the understanding and practice of baptism.»
Certainly the principle «treat every human humanely»,
which is really the Golden Rule, can be found in most faith
traditions, although the scriptural or
theological support for this statement will be particular to each faith.
[16] This was a sincere and open attempt to set out not only the
theological understanding of that
which divided various
traditions, one from the other, but also to suggest
theological and practical guidelines toward overcoming such divisions.
My students are mostly Jewish and Christian, since the relationship between these two
traditions is the center of my work, but we have given much thought to the relation of our
traditions to the others, especially to Islam,
which stands in a special relationship to ours for both historical and
theological reasons.
When
theological schemes are interpreted against the background of this wider reality, we can come to see that the concerns
which have shaped specific
theological positions are ones that other
traditions often share, even if with a different emphasis and linked with other concerns.
It is for practical reasons and not only
theological ones that he stresses the importance for ecumenism of the Life and Work programs for justice, peace and the integrity of creation (as well as, to mention other topics of importance to him and his audience, the «celebration of diversity» and the need for an «ecumenical hermeneutic» to satisfy doubters that there is such a thing as the «apostolic
tradition» to
which ecumenism must be faithful).
To believe that whether or not scholars are Christian is irrelevant to the excellence of their scholarship is to reject a rich philosophical and
theological tradition and to adopt a form of the fideism for
which many Catholics justly criticize many Protestants.