To a great extent
our theological understanding of faith, virtue, and happiness has lost this emphasis on the primacy of openness to the surprise of promise.
But in making this surrender our critics must not be very far from exemplifying
the theological understanding of faith.
Not exact matches
Recently, I've come to
understand to a greater degree how «a theology» can replace «a
faith» and mask itself as the real thing.I'm not anti-
theological, in fact, I'm very
theological - the difference in my approach now is a realization that if one has some degree
of traditional, but contemporary
faith in God (as I do), then a theology is inevitable....
Guiding Principles Religious and
theological studies depend on and reinforce each other; A principled approach to religious values and
faith demands the intellectual rigor and openness
of quality academic work; A well - educated student
of religion must have a deep and broad
understanding of more than a single religious tradition; Studying religion requires that one
understand one's own historical context as well as that
of those whom one studies; An exemplary scholarly and teaching community requires respect for and critical engagement with difference and diversity
of all kinds.
We need a functional standard
of orthodoxy: one supple enough to do justice to the sorts
of nuances Griffiths introduces, but one real enough to help us
understand when
theological speculation, novelty, and critique undermine rather than enrich the
faith of the Church.
The radical secularization that has transformed Christianity's heartland into the most religiously arid half - continent on the planet has at least as much to do with the craven surrender
of ministers
of the gospel to
theological and political fads, and their consequent loss
of faith, as it does with the impact
of urbanization, mass education, and the industrial revolution on Europeans»
understanding of themselves.
The
Faith movement has this principle at the heart of its approach to the formation of young Catholics, seeking to foster an inquisitive approach to the faith, just as in the natural sciences, and to develop such intellectual curiosity within a theological framework that is faithful to Christ's Magisterium and to our understanding of the created univ
Faith movement has this principle at the heart
of its approach to the formation
of young Catholics, seeking to foster an inquisitive approach to the
faith, just as in the natural sciences, and to develop such intellectual curiosity within a theological framework that is faithful to Christ's Magisterium and to our understanding of the created univ
faith, just as in the natural sciences, and to develop such intellectual curiosity within a
theological framework that is faithful to Christ's Magisterium and to our
understanding of the created universe.
However, if the subjects
of study are concrete networks
of human practices by which communities
of faith attempt to respond to God faithfully, and if they are practices which mediate an
understanding of God, then the movement
of theological schooling is more like an engaged meditative gaze than it is like problem solving.
Most ancient interpreters
understood the Timaeus» arche to regard a metaphysical, not a temporal, principle: Wallis, 20, 65, 68, 77,102 f [19] For the metaphysical grounding
of these statements cf. J. McDermott, S.J., «
Faith, Reason, and Freedom,» Irish
Theological Quarterly 67 (2002), 307 - 332.
Our
theological beliefs about the community
of faith, the images
of God we find meaningful, ethical perspectives based on our
understanding of justice and care, and our interpretation
of suffering and healing, sin and forgiveness, ground us and guide us in responding to the crises
of members
of our congregations.
For those oriented in the black experience, there is a complementary task; namely,
understanding that an indigenous
theological formulation
of faith — black theology — is available to aid in the task.
(My
Understanding the Christian
Faith gives a survey
of theological concepts and is written primarily for laymen.
It would be strange if, after all the recent discussion as to how much Christianity is a «historical
faith,» Christian theologians would adopt an
understanding of theological language which ruled out all historical statements.
The following centuries
of monastic experimentation gave them deep insights into humility, and into the great
theological virtues
of faith, hope and charity, They
understood the Gospels to be saying that we are meant for great things — meant to live in imitation
of Christ himself.
Theology
understood as a practical discipline should not» be confused with those theologies that make the question
of «
faith» the starting point
of theological reflection.
In one
of the essays in this volume, pastoral theologian Carrie Doehring distinguishes between «
theological literacy,» which knows the vocabulary and the right answers to the questions, and «
theological fluency,» in which «we «inhabit» our theology as a
faith perspective that we use to
understand and respond to spiritual and psychological needs.
And yet modernity was also
understood as a philosophical and
theological system that displaced, or at least threatened, what could be called the praeambula fidei — the «preambles
of faith,» which include the truths
of natural reason, particularly on philosophical issues close to sacred doctrine.
Each knows, as a
theological interpreter
of Christian self -
understanding, that
faith in God includes a fundamental trust in and loyalty to both church and world.
For example, one might suggest that if the creative inputs follow that broad
theological / ontological structure
of the Christian
faith, integrate the key role models
of their
faith in the new structure and their inputs can be shown to be informed directly or indirectly by their own «conservative» tradition and the text, the Bible, they could be
understood to be in line with Christianity.
Anselm
of Canterbury coined the phrase Fides Quaerens Intellectum (
Faith Seeking
Understanding) when engaging in
theological investigations.
It was not an example
of «justification by
faith»,
theological jargon, which both Catholic and Lutheran
understand differently with the former confused as sanctification.
If one can recognise the vital role which the mass media are playing in this regard and
understand some
of its major mythologies, exploration
of the process and media mythologies offers a rich resource for
theological reflection and the cultural contextualization
of faith.
Theological education needs to take more seriously than it has that the mass media may be having a marked effect on religious
faith, not just by the media's presentation
of religious issues, but by the influence the media are exerting on perceptions
of social reality within which religious
faith is
understood and experienced.
Theological educators in this second group stress that the conventional course of theological study is inadequate to the pluralism of ways in which the Christian faith is understood
Theological educators in this second group stress that the conventional course
of theological study is inadequate to the pluralism of ways in which the Christian faith is understood
theological study is inadequate to the pluralism
of ways in which the Christian
faith is
understood and lived.
They help to define the nature
of evangelicalism's
theological impasse in a way that the average Christian churchgoer who reflects on the
faith can
understand.
Karl Barth, who changed the direction
of twentieth century theology with his recognition
of the bankruptcy
of nineteenth century liberalism, nevertheless did not ignore the
theological discussion
of those whose
understanding of the
faith he judged to be inadequate.
I need more than the resources
of Bible,
theological tradition, and my own commitments if I am to
understand my
faith and the world in which it is set; I also need the ethical insights
of my secular colleagues, the political and psychological analyses
of my friends and foes, and the prophetic jab
of nonchurchmen whose degree
of commitment so often puts my own to shame.20
Unfortunately, in the Western Church, after the substitution
of «right beliefs» for «works» or «fruits
of the Spirit» as the sign
of authentic
faith by in classical Protestantism and the Enlightenment's emphasis on a reductionistic
understanding of reason based solely on empirical logic,
faith became confused with orthodox
theological beliefs.
Reumann outlines the historical hardening
of theological categories between Lutherans and Catholics arising out
of the Reformation doctrine
of justification by
faith, and the convergence toward a common
understanding on justification and related doctrines through Lutheran - Catholic dialogues over the past thirty years.
If one has never journeyed into the deep — prayed (which includes Scripture /
theological study,
faith sharing, adoration, spiritual formation / retreats, pilgramages, Mass, reconciliation, fasting, listening for God's voice, and more) on an ongoing fashion or done God's will (been obedient, patient, humble, unconditionally sacrificing, unselfish) to the extent that they
understand what it means to be Catholic and God being your number one priority — that His Ways and those
of His Church are not the ways
of the world (trade vices for virtues) and that we are being called into communion with Him via love for Him and one another in our
faith community and broader community — then it is no wonder some are lost or disillusioned.
«1 What theologians have to show if they want to be heard is the biblical view that the world is unintelligible apart from Christ.2 The
theological hang - up on the problem
of the Jesus
of history and the Christ
of faith is irrelevant for the ordinary man whose goal is the
understanding of the message
of Christ and which task is theology's very purpose.
After earning her Master
of Arts in Theology from Fuller
Theological Seminary in 2000, Crystal went on to become the Senior Pastor at Shema Congregation, a Messianic Church
of the Nazarene congregational plant that strives to
understand and embrace the Hebraic roots
of the Christian
faith.
If the total coincidence
of transcendence and immanence is vision, and not structure
of existence, then the traditional styles
of faith and practices
of faith may still have possible meaning, even though they are seen to be penultimate; and then the radical theologian can be
understood as standing in a spectrum
of theological positions and not in isolation.
As it turned out, I came to a deeper
understanding of the structural polarities and
theological paradoxes that communicate «
faith» in any efficacious performance
of Christian liturgy.
In the five chapters
of this book I have selected and discussed outstanding examples
of Old Testament myth, legend, history, prophecy and law in an effort to show that common
theological presuppositions underlie all
of these varying literary types, and that they must be read and
understood as speaking from
faith to
faith.
New Testament theology is thus disqualified from playing a constructive role in the forming
of a
theological method which shall take seriously the problem
of faith and history, and particularly this
faith, rooted as no other religious
faith is, in the very concreteness
of history, and becomes nothing more than»... the first permanent expression
of the distinctively Christian consciousness, and begs the question
of the external history
of that consciousness» (Ibid., 57, 58) «thus leaving... theology with nothing to discussion except the human need for self -
understanding in general.»
Without exposure to practices that help people develop a solid biblical and
theological foundation and which encourage them to develop their capacities to think ethically and theologically, the unschooled mind
of the child will pull Christian communities and individuals toward simplistic
understandings of the
faith.
He writes, inter alia, «When the pope is
understood not only as final arbiter to the deposit
of faith but also its only source
of theological reinterpretation, there is surely at least an impoverishment
of the Church's
theological life.»
In 1979, a consultation «inaugurated» by the
Faith and Order Commission
of the World Council
of Churches, which was held at Louisville, Kentucky, at the Southern Baptist
Theological Seminary, brought together representatives
of the paedo - baptist and believer - baptist traditions «to reflect on some kind
of consensus in the
understanding and practice
of baptism.»
Key concepts such as the personal nature
of revelation and
faith, truth as encounter, and the christocentric
understanding of the church and ethics have entered our
theological consciousness.
As expressed in the preface to his Foundations
of Christian
Faith, his
theological intention was «to reach a renewed
understanding of this message and to arrive at an «idea»
of Christianity... and... try as far as possible to situate Christianity within the intellectual horizon
of people today.
So while I
understand the logic behind the doctrine, it seems that with a
theological slight -
of - hand we have developed a central idea to the entire Christian
faith!
What is needed today, I believe, is the radical attempt to work Out a
theological pattern for Christian
faith which is in the main influenced by process - philosophy, while at the same time use is made
of what we have been learning from the existentialist's insistence on engagement and decision, the
understanding of history as involving genuine participation and social context, and the psychologist's awareness
of the depths
of human emotional, conational, and rational experience.
The various
theological controversies
of the early centuries
of Christianity — regarding our
understanding of the two central mysteries
of the
faith, the Incarnation and Trinity — saw the question itself first deepened and clarified, and then answered with philosophical rigour.
The concept
of the person was developed and refned in the crucible
of Christian philosopher — theologians trying to grapple with
understanding (and misunderstanding) the two fundamental
theological mysteries
of the Christian
faith.
These «
theological» experiences
of ours are bound to bring about some fundamental changes in the way we do Christian theology,
understand the nature and task
of the Christian church, and paractice our Christian
faith in Asia.
This conclusion bears great
theological significance for an
understanding of human nature, obedience, and
faith, but Turner seems content to state that it calls into question the idea that God's will overcomes all obstacles in Genesis.
Schleiermacher has always been a
theological model not so much in the content
of his thought as in his basic approach to
faith, which is a very rational, historically oriented approach within a tradition, with the
understanding that one can not simply swallow the tradition but has to enter into a reasonable dialogue with it.