Thus philosophy was recognized, not as one academic discipline among others, distinguished by its subject matter, but as replacing
theology as the queen of the sciences.
Its task was not to provide an overarching context, since it no longer located
theology as the queen of the sciences.
Not exact matches
For example, on the one hand, when St Thomas Aquinas in his great mediaeval theological works treats
theology as the «
queen of the sciences», yet «the subordination of metaphysics to
theology did not necessarily entail an obstruction to the study of nature» (p. 81)-- it «had not resulted in a sterile fusion» (p. 84).
Theology may be,
as the medieval church called it, the
queen of the sciences,» but this
queen is not a tyrant.
Even simple ordinary folk today put reason before faith, unlike before the «enlightenment» when
theology was accepted
as the «
queen of sciences» and science its handmaid.
Most of the students were in holy orders and
theology was regarded
as the «
queen of the sciences».
Reason - based kalam could not become the «
queen of sciences,»
as theology did in the Latin West and remained subordinate to traditional ijtahid.
Theology was the
queen of the sciences, and these latter gradually began to emerge
as individual disciplines.
In this instance,
as in others,
theology remains the
queen of the sciences.
Today, far from being seen
as the
queen of sciences,
theology has effectively been excluded from any synthetic understanding of the world.
Although
theology was no longer
queen of the sciences, it held its head high in the German universities and had the respect of the culture,
as well
as the church.