Not exact matches
There is so much
theology that can be dug up
out of the
text if you try hard enough.
Several
of us entered into a heated discussion with our visitor,
out of which a relative consensus emerged: We do read the classic
texts of Latin American
theology (Gutiérrez, Boff, Segundo, Sobrino, Miguez Bonino and others), some
of them for their historical importance, others for their continuing relevance.
The problem with
theology is that people read back into the
text the ideas that they have established
out of the
text.
What I didn't get round to doing when I set
out: lots
of exegesis, lots
of historical
theology, mastering the big
texts of the traditions
of the church.
As Gerhard von Rad has established in his great work, The
Theology of the Old Testament, and principally in volume one, «The
Theology of Traditions,» Israel essentially confessed God through the ordering
of its sagas, traditions, and stories around a few kernel events from which meaning spread
out through the whole structure.4 Von Rad believes he has discovered the most ancient kernel
of the Hebraic Credo in a
text such as Deut.
We may wish for inclusive language and may shy from such «moralizing»
of the
text, but coupled with Briscoe's lessons on
theology and God's ways with people, such moral teaching does not seem
out of place.