Sentences with phrase «theology today»

About Blog Biblical Theology Today is a ministry helping Christian understand the Christocentric unity of all the Scriptures.
About Blog Biblical Theology Today is a ministry helping Christian understand the Christocentric unity of all the Scriptures.
About Blog Biblical Theology Today is a ministry helping Christian understand the Christocentric unity of all the Scriptures.
Maybe what we all need most in theology today is a new Ockham's razor and new interlocutors to help us learn how to use it.
Christian theology today is becoming more and more comfortable with the view that the symbols of all the religions are in some sense revelatory of the same God that biblical religion discloses in its own manner.
Both for this presentation and for the conference in general we have selected three terms to represent what we take to be three methodological alternatives in process theology today.
Would returning to the view that was rejected for theological reasons be detrimental to theology today?
• Of course it is not representative of academic theology today.
Theology today must be both confessional and self - critical.
That Catholic theology today offers the modern secular world a vision of civilizational unity it no longer seeks.
Finally, the class turned to perspectival theologies, perhaps the dominant ones in academic theology today.
Older theologians are dismayed as they see the traditional forms of faith gradually transformed by this process, but the one conviction that would seem to be shared by all who are actively engaged in American theology today is that these older forms of faith have no relevance to the present.
Oedipal theology today asks such questions as these: «Who is my Father?
I think it is appropriate to perceive contextual theology today as «vita quaerens dialogum» (life - seeking dialogue).
Theology today has to arrange itself accordingly.
1981 — «The Concept of a Theology of Liberation: Must a Christian Theology Today Be So Conceived?»
There are developments occurring in both science and theology today that not only allow but actually advocate such a synthesis.
Schweitzer had little personal sympathy for eschatology, and saw in it no potentiality for theology today.
Such are the issues of theology today.
Martin Luther King, Jr., «The Three Dimensions of a Complete Life,» sermon quoted in Richard Lischer, «The Word That Moves: The Preaching of Martin Luther King, Jr.,» Theology Today, July 1989, p. 174.
The issue of how to interpret the alleged finality of Christian revelation is receiving considerable attention in theology today, and in Chapter 4 we shall look into it somewhat more closely.
This means first of all that a certain economy of expression is essential in our theology today.
The best theology today, in its repudiation of a rhetorical religious idealism, finds itself in agreement with a recurrent note in contemporary poetry.
Cobb's deep conviction, which he defends at length in his new book, is that the fortunes of natural theology today depend on Christian theologians appropriating the philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead.
In a fine essay in Theology Today, Roland M. Frye notes that the Renaissance's great achievements in perspective and mathematical precision created a condition in which it became possible to make literal descriptions of reality.
I join in recommending a reading of his article in Theology Today (January 2002).
A leading exponent of process theology is a nonpareil of theology today, John Cobb, to whom this book is dedicated.
Theology today is thematic and not systematic.
Theology today must be articulated by means of philosophical concepts, and these should be evaluated according to purely philosophical criteria of consistency, coherence, adequacy, and applicability.
[«Trademarks of Theology,» Theology Today (January 1987), p. 469].
Theology Today, 32, 1975, 56 - 73.
«One feature of this theological scene is the predominance of what Hugh T. Kerr, Jr., editor of Theology Today, calls «single - issue theology.»
But I suggest this is the problem with much Christian practical theology today: it separates serving God from serving the person.
These concerns suggest the counter question and its ecclesial overtones in Protestant theology today: Have we so allowed the world, with its question of suffering and its plea for hope, to set the church's agenda that the very identity of Christian faith and validity of the church are imperiled?
24, No. 1, 1944, pp. 59 ff., and by Wilhelm Pauck, «Luther and the Reformation,» Theology Today, Vol.
There is a refining edge to this objection, and theology today must take it into account.
This strongly suggests, I believe, that any assertion that God is the subject of the experience of others is certain to create a peculiar problem for theology today.
It is evident that there is a serious erosion or slippage in the language of theology today.
See the critical reviews by John Cobb in Religion in Life, XXXII, 2 (Spring 1963), 294 - 304; Julian Hartt in The Review of Metaphysics, XVI, 4 (Jane 1963), 747 - 769; John Hick in Theology Today, XX, 2 (July 1963), 295 - 298; and H. W. Johnstone in The Journal of Philosophy, XL, 16 (August 1, 1963), 467 - 472.
See also the extensive critical reviews by Langdon Gilkey in Theology Today, XXII, 4 (January 1966), esp.
Sidney Hook, Theology Today 20, 4 (Jan., 1964), 585.
I will first explain why theology today must be fully empirical and fully rational, then come to the question of why it must also be speculative.
Glenn Bucher on PC in Theology Today, January 1993.
Conversely, Christian theology today can be enriched by recovering an understanding of and reverence for God's Jewish name, as the foundation of one indispensable pattern of naming along with the two others that have always played a necessary role in Christian worship and thought.
Theology today must make this attempt in order to fulfill its task of defending the truth of the beliefs involved in Christian faith.
We will also see that we might be teaching the same sort of terrible theology today.
correlational method (i.e., correlating an interpretation of the tradition with an interpretation of our situation) remains the best hope for theology today.
Marty, Martin E., «Introduction: American Protestant Theology Today Frontline Theology, ed.
Then in light of this summary, I will explore how a theology informed by his insights might differ from what we see in theology today.
George Sumner on Wolfhart Pannenberg, Theology Today, April 2000.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z