Here are a few reasons why your «six days and a talking snake»
theory of the origins of the Universe and its billions of galaxies is utter garbage.
Not aware of any proof of a particular
theory of the origin of the Universe that excludes other theories that it has no origin.
Intelligent Design is older than Spontaneous Existence as
a theory of origin.
Maybe he got tired of rolling over & playing dead while people ran roughshod over
HIS theory of the origin of the universe.
Acharya S isn't really a legitimate scholar and her astrotheology
theory of the origin of Christianity isn't supported by any evidence.
At one level this doctrine may be seen as
a theory of the origin of the universe, but at this level it interests neither Altizer nor his critics.
The issue was idolatry, not science; syncretism, not natural history; theology, not chronology; affirmation of faith in one transcendent God, not creationist or evolutionist
theories of origin.
: Funny how Creationism is the oldest
theory of origins yet it still holds its ground today» This is just sad.
@justageeker, 1) I don't think there is an accepted scientific
theory of the origin of the universe, yet.
Funny how Creationism is the oldest
theory of origins yet it still holds its ground today.
The difference between these two
theories of origin has tangible scientific consequences.
Yet it stands head and shoulders above its nearest rival; its separateness inheres, not in
theories of its origin and nature, but in the solid facts of its worth and of its impact upon human society in the way both of rebuke to the low and bestial and of exaltation of an impossible ideal, toward which, nonetheless, it has attracted and impelled.
As we will see in the next chapter, this is similar to Horace Bushnell's
theory of the origin of theological words, but points to the unexpectedness of the way in which words are related.
Kant put forward
a theory of the origin of the solar system, but again made no calculations.
The present most widely accepted
theory of the origin of the universe — that of the hot big bang — claims that most of the helium is the product of the big bang itself and occurred within the very first minute of the existence of the expanding universe, and that the background radiation which is now being studied so intensively provides some evidence of the date of this initial explosion.
«The creation record is factual, historical, and persp -LSB--RSB- icuous; thus
all theories of origins or development that involve evolution in any form are false.»
There is a story told of how the famous astronomer Pierre Simon de Laplace was explaining to Napoleon
his theory of the origin of the planets.
In the Essence of Christianity there is another indication of
a theory of the origins of religion.
That a divine being created the world — is not faith in the Creator, but
a theory of the origin of the world, which signifies nothing.
Holding to evolution as
a theory of origins that trumps all others as pure science is in and of itself faith.
To my knowledge, evolution is still
a theory of origins, not fact.
Since evolution has not been observed nor has it been repeated, it is still theory and should be treated as one possible
theory of origins.
[3][4][5][6] Lemaître also proposed what became known as the Big Bang
theory of the origin of the Universe, which he called his «hypothesis of the primeval atom».
The idea of a beginning may fit the «Big Bang»
theory of the origin of the universe, but the primary purpose of the Christian doctrine of creation is to affirm that the world is not self - existent but dependent on a purposive being.
First, the court noted that the school board's disavowal of endorsement of evolution is juxtaposed with urging that students contemplate alternative
theories of the origin of life.
I've read material on one site (the site has 5K + pages, of which I read less than 100) that uses Velikosky as part of the starting point for
a theory of the origin of the universe, and subsequently humans, that is congruent with Genesis, but also both explains and predicts things not found in that account.
Perhaps the most unusual
theory of the origin of the word curry comes from Selat Elbis Sopmi of London's Punjab Restaurant, who wrote in The Curry Club Magazine that some centuries ago an Irish sea captain married into a wealthy family.
Ever since, scientists have debated the cause of the anomaly, split over two competing
theories of its origin.
I sh [ould] d like to take some one family, to study thoroughly — principally with a view to
the theory of the origin of species.
«The making of Antarctica: New explanation links competing
theories of the origin of Antarctic glaciation and highlights complexity of climate change.»
The most widely accepted
theory of the origin of the Moon speculates that a giant object smashed into the proto - Earth at just enough velocity that part of both bodies broke off and formed the moon.
But astronomers have struggled to assemble a complete
theory of their origin that explains how the initial dust develops into planetary systems.
The Encounter
Theory of the Origin of Planets Has Now Become Shaky and May Pass into the Limbo Where the Old Nebular Hypothesis Went
Hubble's Law is a major piece of evidence that the universe is expanding — his work formed the basis of the big bang
theory of the origin of the universe.
u «But if we had a reliable
theory of the origin of planets, if we knew of some mechanism consistent with the laws of physics so that we understood how
With such divine mystery surrounding them determining from whence they came is difficult to pinpoint, but we have our own
theory of their origin (see more below).
Danielle «Danny» Flinders (Vikander) is a bio-mathematician working on a deep sea diving project to support
her theory of the origin of life on the planet.
The most popular
theory of the origin of the Clumber is that the breed began in the 1700s with a heavy - headed dog called the Alpine Spaniel.
Janice Kolar - Matznick joined Julie Fudge Smith for a lively discussion about the current
theories of the origin of the dog, why those...
, which humorously plays on the Big Bang
theory of the origin of the universe.
Beginning in the 1960s, physicists sought to prove the existence of the Higgs boson, a subatomic particle popularly nicknamed «the God Particle» because of its association with
theories of the origin of the universe.
For example, on fundamental ontological questions about who we are and how we got here, conservatives are far more likely to doubt scientific
theories of origins, including theories of natural selection and the Big Bang.
I am sure many find Spencer's theory of climate as compelling as
his theory of origins.
He goes on to argue that «evolutionism» is «based almost entirely on faith,» and that not to allow teaching of other
theories of origins runs counter to the First Amendment right of free speech.
For instance, there is compelling scientific evidence that our planet is about 4.5 billion years old (
the theory of the origin of Earth), that our universe was born from a single event about 14 billion years ago (the Big Bang theory), and that today's organisms evolved from ones living in the past (the theory of evolution).
An evolutionary — developmental
theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity
Not exact matches
They started by adding carbon to Lake 227 which disproved the detergent industry's
theory on the
origin of algal blooms.
It's important to note that evolutionary
theory does not attempt to explain the
origins of life.
Someone wants to bring up their conspiracy
theory about the globalist
origins of the climate change
theory?
Try the chemical
origin of life
theory.