Sentences with phrase «theory do in these cases»

What does right wing political theory do in these cases?

Not exact matches

In any case I would not be objective nor would it be fair if I did not highlight some of the other forms of investment theories that play a role in the mind of the trading world in generaIn any case I would not be objective nor would it be fair if I did not highlight some of the other forms of investment theories that play a role in the mind of the trading world in generain the mind of the trading world in generain general.

Highlights the recent article in the MIT Sloan Management Review co-authored by Andrew King, which argues «the majority» of Christensen's 77 case studies did not fully fit his theory.

And like Evolution, the Theory of Mechanics has been supplanted by more complex and more accurate theories (in the case of Mechanics, both Quantum Mechanics and Relativity have arisen to deal with its flaws; in the case of Evolution, the technical theories - such as gene borrowing and virus - guided genetic drift - do not have catchy names).

What we have done here is (a) accept that mathematics arises from experience, (b) recognize that we can get a general idea of twoness from our experience, (c) accept constraints on our experience — what we can assert as existing and what we can construct — by accepting some formal system, in this case a system defining set theory, and (d) acknowledge that we can define precisely within that system what we mean by number, successor of a number and in the process twoness.

One defect in the theory of purely external relations is that we do in fact usually talk as though events depend on what happens before but not on what happens afterwards; we do talk as though asymmetry is the case.

For it must be noted that the Church's magisterium as such can not and does not seek to attribute to itself any real competence to decide on the degree of intrinsic scientific probability of a theory in cases where it does not at least provisionally declare the theory to be contrary to the teaching of Revelation.

Again, as in the case of humility, trusting the research and the theories of others does not mean uncritical acceptance.

Thus, in considering the influence of philosophical resources upon the development of theology in America, we do well in Dewey's case not to emphasize (as do most commentators) A Common Faith, but rather to attend to the earlier «nontheological» works: Studies in Logical Theory and How We Think.

What we do believe in is that knowledge and facts need to be supported by evidence and that if new information comes forward that challenges commonly held beliefs, then you need to revise your theories and in some cases throw out the old ones.

The problems may, in theory, be more amenable to correction in the centrally controlled economies but this does not seem to be the case in practice.

For a society — I do not speak to particular cases — they are not separable in theory, in practice, or in fact.

That task can be specified more exactly: it is to capacitate students» minds quite specifically for apologetics, for making well - warranted cases for theories about what can and can not be known about God, what should and should not be done in fidelity to God's nature and action.

In the case of Harpur's theory (that Jesus didn't exist, and that deliberate efforts have been made to choose to make the myths interpreted literally), his evidence is not as convincing or as extensive as the evidence for Jesus having been a real person, on whom a certain religious and political systems have been formed and which have embellished, perverted, and developed certain aspects, with intentions both deliberate and unintentional.

But with Xhaka set to appear at the Euro 2016 tournament in the summer, there is a theory that the Arsenal boss wants to get the deal done as soon as possible, just in case he performs well for the Swiss team and draws transfer attention from some other big clubs around Europe.

In case you didn't know, there has been much folk lore on the interweb regarding Jar Jar Binks, including a famous reddit theory regarding him being Supreme Leader Snoke.

but this theory of foot in the door could apply in some cases when the women did like the guy and wanted to send signal that she likes him.

In theory those thoughts wouldn't matter for a generic tax, but in this case it would (but it doesn't really matter for the scope of your QIn theory those thoughts wouldn't matter for a generic tax, but in this case it would (but it doesn't really matter for the scope of your Qin this case it would (but it doesn't really matter for the scope of your Q).

What's more, theory suggests that in some cases, swapping the anyons back again does not restore their original wavefunction.

He and Deffner chose to test, using new equations they developed, whether one specific quantum field theory held true in the rare case of a system of extremely small size and extremely high energy — and it did.

Though unproven and hotly debated, the theory remains intriguing because known cancer - causing genes such as BRCA - 1 explain only a percentage of human breast cancer cases, and because viruses do cause other forms of cancer in humans and animals.

Green's film isn't interested in finding out who did it, it is interested in revealing all the various theories about the case, and more importantly, understanding why those theories have manifested.

But that theory doesn't exactly fly in this case, as Watts's career has never been one bound to vanity, nor to the types of projects that would scoff at a grand actress who's simply not 30 anymore.

Many districts simply fail to define their theories of reform - in some cases because superintendents and school - board members can not agree on what should be done; in other cases because officials don't wish to make specific promises about actions and results.

As the motivation behind a system or graph is to place your thoughts regarding the theme on essay, in a respectably sorted out arrangement, the arrangement you make for your layout can in any case alter ahead of the theory is finished, thus don't struggle with this.

Ya learn more: again, this is in theory, and again, I don't see why this wouldn't be the case with trad pub.

The most basic problem for MCT, and all believers in efficient markets is that they take a very narrow special case — OPMIs dealing in «sudden death» securities — and claim, as the Nobel Prize winner does, that their theories apply to all markets universally.

But these are extreme cases and these are people much smarter than myself — they do not follow modern portfolio theory, and are engaged in their investments to a larger degree than non-financial professionals.

In case you think all of this is just theory, I ran the numbers to see whether this really worked in practice — and it diIn case you think all of this is just theory, I ran the numbers to see whether this really worked in practice — and it diin practice — and it did.

I'm not one to argue with success, and I'm not sure what techniques the trainer you worked with may have recommended, but I would caution you to be wary of any methods that are based on dominance theory — this paradigm has been pretty widely discredited in the dog training world since the early 2000s, and can unfortunately do a lot of harm in some cases.

This means you can, in most cases, do all your theory online before your arrival on Bali and don't need to spend any time in the classroom on Bali.

It's a case where the theory really did work out in practice, in that everyone benefited by getting free gameplay - content in addition to the part where they got some free cosmetics too.

Unfortunately in most cases it just doesn't hold up either as theory or as art, even if one is sympathetic.

Darwin did not explain «all», but still is considered one of the major modern scientists (please note I did not specify one Darwin over the other in case you are familar with modern evolutionary theory or say which one deservers the accolades).

In that case it is a must to do so, because it is the easiest way to verify a theory.

On AGW Theory: Here, you're making the mistake I allude to above in discussing Sen. Inhofe — lumping «AGW theory» (which even Michael Crichton did not dispute) with the range of views (some supported, some not) on whether the case has been made for dangerous human - driven climate cTheory: Here, you're making the mistake I allude to above in discussing Sen. Inhofe — lumping «AGW theory» (which even Michael Crichton did not dispute) with the range of views (some supported, some not) on whether the case has been made for dangerous human - driven climate ctheory» (which even Michael Crichton did not dispute) with the range of views (some supported, some not) on whether the case has been made for dangerous human - driven climate change.

It is interesting that biology has, in the case, provided a universal theory based on a single simple mechanism (if we include genetic drift and neutral theory, though admittedly not part of Darwin's formally stated understanding), whereas physics has not done so for climate change, given that it is potentially caused by many different mechanisms.

In that case, those closer to the source of knowledge do not show any uncertainty, quite the contrary, they are strong advocates of their theory or technology.

Also See: Watch Now: Climate Depot's Morano on Fox News Mocking «Climate Astrology»: «This is now akin to the predictions of Nostradamus or the Mayan calendar» — Morano: «There is no way anyone can falsify the global warming theory now because any weather event that happens «proves» their case... Man - made global warming has ceased to be a science, it is now the level of your daily horoscope» — Gore [in 2006 film] did not warn us of extreme blizzards and record cold winters coming»

They do not understand the case for AGW, they believe any piece of non-science, such as Miskicolzci, they rant on about lunatic conspiracy theories, they construct elaborate straw man arguments, misrepresent the case put by the IPCC and indulge in frantic arm waving.

In theory the scientific method should train that tendency out of you but it is clear that in this case it did noIn theory the scientific method should train that tendency out of you but it is clear that in this case it did noin this case it did not.

Their task is not to prove that angioplasty doesn't work, it is to prove that «CCSVI» is not the case of blood flow problems in MS. CCSVI is the theory that the veins are damaged and obstructing the blood flow.

Only in the rare «paradigm changing» cases do they prevail, and eventually become well - accepted theories.

Among them are legions of generally well - meaning lambs who think that, regardless of the merits, this theory has immense social benefits, and it does not hurt to be cautious in any case.

In any case, even if your interesting theory about gravity slowing heat transfer in wires were correct, it doesn't matteIn any case, even if your interesting theory about gravity slowing heat transfer in wires were correct, it doesn't mattein wires were correct, it doesn't matter.

Vis.: [Coby]: «In the case of the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming, what we do have is a theory (first conceived over 100 years ago) that is based on well established laws of physics...».

I do have my doubts about this in extreme cases like assigning prior probabilities to different cosmological theories, where it's hard to see why people should have evolved to have intuitive knowledge of what's plausible, but we're not dealing with that sort of problem here.

Needless to say that it of course doesn't work with N - S because the probability distribution of u is not known in the general case but the whole Kolmogorov turbulence theory is precisely based on assumptions leading to «reasonable» distributions of u that work in some precisely specified cases.

It should be especially easy to see [apparently it was not] in the case of a planetary mechanism where you do not need to know the intricacies of the dynamo theory.

Climate Depot's Morano on Fox News Mocking Gore's «Climate Astrology»: «This is now akin to the predictions of Nostradamus or the Mayan calendar» — Morano: «There is no way anyone can falsify the global warming theory now because any weather event that happens «proves» their case... Man - made global warming has ceased to be a science, it is now the level of your daily horoscope» — Gore [in 2006 film] did not warn us of extreme blizzards and record cold winters coming»