Sentences with phrase «theory is false»

Nick, Doesn't that just prove the AGW theory is false?

If the evidence does not support the theory, then suspect that the theory is false.

Janice: If observations do not support the theory, the the theory is FALSE.

However if I was to state that this proves that the AGW theory is false and the Earth is actually cooling that would not necessarily be true.

If you are a scientist and your theory predicts warming but nothing happens for 17 years you are justified in assuming that the theory is false and and belongs in the waste basket of history.

4 If the predictions are false, we conclude the theory is false.

If the prediction of a theory fails then the theory is false.

Rather, one can claim that the test results conflict with predictions because some other theory is false or unrecognised.

Even if the sebum theory is false, the two fantastic studies can not be ignored, and I believe that the answer lies in guggul gum and its derivatives» strong anti-inflammatory properties.

There has to be a way to prove a scientific theory is false.

Calling it a theory is false equivalence.

When virtually every expert in the field agrees that the Theory is a fact, arguing that because the details aren't all agreed on the theory is false is silly and requires enormous hubris.

Bill explains why this theory is false.

But they don't confuse part of the theory being weak with either the whole theory being false or the phenomenon being false.

In this way Strauss was able to see where Reimarus had gone wrong and why his hoax theory was false.

So it has been 130 years since the Scopes Trial, Darwin him self said if over the next century science could not discover support for complex evolution then his theory was false.

Collective delusion, just like the luminiferous aether, caloric (even Lord Kelvin took a fair amount of convincing before he accepted that the caloric theory was false), and many others.

Confirmation holism in the context of a complex model implies that a single element of the model can not be tested in isolation since each element depends on the other elements, and hence it is impossible to determine if the underlying theories are false by reference to the evidence.

Not exact matches

Well, there's the inability to process even basic information, mood swings, anger outbursts, false memories, lack of impulse control, belligerence, paranoid tendencies to spout conspiracy theories, and things like retweeting Mussolini.

I'll write about the bogus «China gold demand» theory again in the future as it's one of the most persistent false beliefs within the bullish camp, but in this post I'm going to quickly deal with another China - related false belief that periodically shifts to the centre of the bullish stage: the idea that China's government is preparing to back the Yuan with gold.

But gun rights enthusiasts are not mistaken to see a somewhat manipulative strategy at work — even as their baroque conspiracy theories remain utterly false.

Yet if Feyerabend is correct, and an unpopular new theory can ignore or reject experimental data long enough to get its footing, how much longer can an old and creaky theory, buttressed by the reputations and influence and political power of hundreds of established practitioners, continue to hang in the air even when the results upon which it is premised are exposed as false?

Such regress has happened before: In the nineteenth century, the (correct) vitamin C deficiency theory of scurvy was replaced by the false belief that scurvy was caused by proximity to spoiled foods.

Making a judgement about a faith, be it Christianity or Islam, on the basis of a few extremists has about the same logical errancy as saying evolution is false because Hitler's murderous race purification rampage was fueled by his study of Darwin's theory, a truth written by Hitler himself.

Behe presented the evidence for his hypothesis, Ken Miller proved how each piece of evidence he put forward was false, and the theory of evolution once again proved to be the top candidate to explain the phenomena of biological changes over time.

And you say the theory of evolution is false because there is, and i quote «not enough proof».

For the overpopulation literature has not only been abandoned by thinkers for more improved science; it has actually been so thoroughly proved false that today's cutting - edge theory worries about precisely the opposite: a «dearth birth» that is «graying» the advanced world.

Your only reponse is to argue that anything god does is moral (Divine Command Theory) and that is false.

«It is THE one theory the ENTIRE science establishment agrees» false — this is what all evolutionists want everyone to believe.

You have correct definitions, except you left out the definition of a SCIENTIFIC theory, which is different than a regular theory in that these theories are true but still might be able to be proven false.

Modern science does not directly imply or require any particular metaphysical theory of reality, but it does suggest to us that the picture presented by Daniel Dennett and Richard Dawkins is false because the picture is only partial.

Science takes credit for trying to interpret what God has created (yet of course there theories are always wrong or never proven, even after proven, often changed when found out to be false (because scientists are wrong all the time and think they are right)

Science and Religion News Science and Scientism At the heart of the natural sciences is falsifiability, the ability to prove a theory false by experiment or observation.

Of believers / the godly / the just to whom he is writing, he uses the pronoun «you» (v. 1,3,13) But of the ungodly / the wicked / those who are reserved by God for judgment / the ungodly / etc the writer always designates such by the pronouns «them», «these», «their» and «they» (v. 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11,12,13,14,17,18,19,2021,22) So your theory that the false teachers of verse 1 who bring upon themselves swift destruction / perdition are believers is entirely a fabrication divorced from the context!

Such an opinion would presuppose the false theory that all that is moral is susceptible as such of being brought completely and explicitly before the mind by reflection.

All this would not matter, were it not that he is giving non biologists a largely false picture of the state of evolutionary theory.»

Jones is a regular in the conspiracy - theory arena, calling out instances like Sandy Hook, Stoneman Douglas and Aurora as «false flags» designed to attack the Second Amendment.

This non-sense of claiming that the Hebrew calendar is irrelevant to science and the «theory» of evolution is just another pig - rear false statement with no quantifiable evidence to back that up.

orse than these fallacies is that Beck's theory fails to account for the majority of false abuse allegations.

On the other hand, those components of creationism which involve certain types of magical events (e.g., the divine creation of a young universe with all of its components bearing the false imprint of great age) make the claims of creationism untestable — making creationism not a theory at all, because theories must be testable!

If the «Theory of Evolution» were «false» most of biological science would be equally «false».

There are also mathematical theories such as the pythagorean theorm that we take as true because they have never been proven false.

The fact that this false prophet idiot keeps getting followers really astounds me.he picks and chooses which scripture supports his theories like its a buffet restaurant, and he seems to be forgetting some pretty key points that the bible mentions too.Dare I mention that the bible doesn't even mention WHEN in the tribulation the so called rapture occurs?Some believe before, some during and some after..

Myths, like scientific theories, may be true or false, but the test of truth or falsehood is different.

Even if many instances of agreement with experiment do not prove that a theory is true, it would seem that even a single counterinstance of data which disagrees with theory should conclusively prove it false.

But by aligning themselves with those who use a combination of racial theory and customized theology to promote a false narrative for the sake of Palestinian nationalism, the Telos Group is complicit in an ideological process that is not only anti-Israel, but one that leads to some very dark consequences.

The distinction between a proposition's ability to be true or false and its actual truth - value is a significant tenet of Whitehead's theory of propositions.

Yet the assumptions of the dominant economic theory are rather obviously false.

Yet «origin of species» is still taught falsely as a theory, even though the core notional hypothesis has been proven false by geology.

If someone claims the theory of evolution is false because it contradicts their understanding of what the Bible says, that is not a scientific argument in the ordinary meaning of science.