Sentences with phrase «theory of anthropogenic global warming»

(Part of the How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic guide) Objection: The so called «Greenhouse Effect» which is the underpinning of the entire theory of anthropogenic global warming claims that greenhouse gases in the upper atmosphere absorb outgoing long - wave...

This is an attitude that some sincere climate change «skeptics» (as opposed to ExxonMobil - funded deliberate frauds) exhibit: their so - called «skepticism» arises from an a priori sense that human activities can not possibly affect the Earth system in the way that the theory of anthropogenic global warming describes.

This is an attitude that some sincere climate change «skeptics» (as opposed to ExxonMobil - funded deliberate frauds) exhibit: their so - called «skepticism» arises from an a priori sense that human activities can not possibly affect the Earth system in the way that the theory of anthropogenic global warming describes.

The theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming, in particular, is based on radiation physics.

This article also shows how the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) has failed to account for the various real world observations that have been accumulating since the late 1990s.

All due respect to Mike Mann, but his multi-proxy record of the last 1000 years of surface temperature is not fundamental to the theory of anthropogenic global warming.

«Seeing this list people might be fooled into thinking these papers somehow rebut the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW).»

A testable implication of the theory of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is the Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS), the coefficient of proportionality between the logarithm of atmospheric CO2 and surface temperature.

(Although this article discusses correlation and causation in terms of medical research, it can also be used for the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming, since we often hear these two words bandied about whenever the topic arises.

Those who support the theory of anthropogenic global warming (AGW), now known as anthropogenic climate change so that recent cooling can be included in their scenario, always deny that the sun has anything to do with recent global temperature movements.

The legislation is based on the theory of anthropogenic global warming.

Under the Theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming, it is human - generated greenhouse gases, and mainly CO 2, that cause climate change.

As MBH98 has absolutely nothing to do with the theory of anthropogenic global warming I don't know how you come to this conclusion.

Joel, please don't take offense, but I do not think that your theory would work with either the theory of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) or with heat transfer engineering.

It is not credible to suggest the reports were biased in favour of the theory of anthropogenic global warming when the evidence demonstrates the IPCC were, in fact, so cautious.

MOST scientists sceptical of the theory of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) accepted that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas; they simply don't believe it is very potent relative to other natural forces.

Introduction Central to the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is the assumption that the Earth and every one of its subsystems behaviors as if they were blackbodies, that is their «emissivity» potential is calculated as 1.0.

Answer: Is this supposed to mean the theory of anthropogenic global warming must be wrong?

According to the report from Seymour, Cronkite's words from nearly 43 years ago call into question the theory of anthropogenic global warming

Answer: None of the advocates of the theory of anthropogenic global warming claim that CO2 is the only factor controlling temperature in the ocean - atmosphere climate system.

There will always be at least one peer reviewer of your paper who has so bought into the theory of anthropogenic global warming that he will not permit you to publish anything that directly calls the prevailing orthodoxy into question.

it is not possible or logical to make claims of «confidence» or «extremely likely» in regards to the theory of anthropogenic global warming.

Over the past few weeks I have had many opportunities to discuss the theory of anthropogenic global warming with a variety of people.

Those who support the theory of anthropogenic global warming (AGW), now known as anthropogenic climate change (even more recently described as climate disruption) so that recent cooling can be included in their scenario, always deny that the sun has anything to do with recent global temperature movements.

The Stern Review was a report commissioned by the British government, whose conclusions not only supported the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the science behind the theory of anthropogenic global warming, but also advocated immediate action to mitigate the serious global threat climate change poses.

More importantly, most researchers who support the theory of anthropogenic global warming are by no means agreed that it will result in large - scale calamity even if CO2 emissions were to double.

The science absolutely backs up the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming just as much as it backs up the Theories of Evolution or Gravity.

In my view it is time to discard the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW).

This publication has been subject to a considerable amount of hype, for instance apparently «[LC09] has absolutely, convincingly, and irrefutably proven the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming to be completely false.»