Sentences with phrase «theory of global»

1997 Francis Mudge, «The Development of the «Greenhouse» Theory of Global Climate Change in Victorian Times.»

So, having defeated Al Gore in what the Democrats still insist was a stolen election, we have come full circle to George W. introducing legislation to lock into place the bogus theory of global warming, insuring that, as the Earth gives every sign of entering a cooling cycle, we shall continue to destroy the economy by reducing «greenhouse gas» emissions.

I think Terje actually is something of an example of what Michael was referring to in calling for another category: the habit of responding to points where the «skeptics» are obviously wrong by admitting that on this point they're wrong, but there are other «chinks in the data,» and a «problematic culture,» (no specific examples given) which make the theory of global warming somehow not to be acted on.

And one of the fundamental assumptions that Gore doesn't understand is that in the theory of global warming due to humans is, as the CO2 goes up, the temperature will go up.

The price of energy should drive the switch to non-fossil fuel, not some politically correct theory of global warming.

More generally, Pouillet's experimental prowess reminds us today that the current theory of global climate change does not rest upon mere theory only, but upon myriad observations, carried out with care, skill, and ingenuity — including a certain series made on those sunny afternoons in 1837 and 1838.

Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing, in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.

This in itself would in most science fields constitute falsification of the GHG theory of global warming.

After all, you use the quotation that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; what level of evidence would you consider to be extraordinary for the theory of global climate change?

Though long before Hanson's speech in congress or Al Gore, I was familiar with the theory of global warming and gave it enough credence that I thought going into the oil business I was a bit uncomfortable with its implications.

This is the case with the theory of global warming.

The climate scientists, however, do in fact have a consistent theory of global warming based on multiple lines of empirical evidence.

I considered the theory of global warming possible, but I was not convinced that the consequences were being accurately presented to people.

I've posted another message on that thread asking him if there are ANY possible observations that might change his views on the theory of global warming.

In a piece headed Crichton's conspiracy theory, Harold Evans described Crichton's theory as being «in the paranoid political style identified by the renowned historian Richard Hofstadter,» and went on to suggest that «if you happen to be in the market for a conspiracy theory today, there's a rather more credible one documented by the pressure group Greenpeace,» namely the funding by ExxonMobil of groups opposed to the theory of global warming.

Glob al temperature curve simply can not be generated fri temperature changes of the carbon dioxide curve as the greenhouse theory of global warming dictates.

If this is proven out, then to me it will just be one of many, many reasons that the Theory of Global Warming is incorrect.

As an op - ed piece in the Wall Street journal put it: «For decades — going back to Jimmy Carter — politicians have been peddling an America free of fossil fuels...» President Obama has raised the anti-petroleum ghost to a new level of fear linked to the misguided theory of global warming.

The most basic concept behind the theory of global warming is that increasing the CO2 in the atmosphere will change the Earth's climate by making it warmer.

What they are referring to in this last paragraph is the fact that satellites have been showing a temperature anomaly in the troposphere about half the size of the surface temperature readings, despite the fact that the theory of global warming says pretty clearly that the troposphere should warm from CO2 more than the surface.

Emanuel, a recent convert to the theory of global warming, had just concluded research that found a link between rising sea - surface temperatures and the increasing destructiveness of hurricanes.

Publicly, insurers have not accepted the theory of global warming, which says that the accumulation of greenhouse gases - in part because of activities like burning fossil fuels - is changing weather patterns.

The theory of Global Warming indicates that they should behave in the same manner.

His work is compelling and is yet one more example of a prominent scientist that disagrees with the anthropogenic theory of global warming.

He is now a critic of the anthropogenic theory of global warming.

The reason it is a mystery is because that increase in sea ice coverage is contrary to the theory of global warming.

These beliefs began to take organised, international, political form in the 1970s... The G7 Summit in Toronto in 1988 endorsed the theory of global warming.

Now, the current failed theory of Global Warming put forth by the armchair alarmists is that the glacial cycles are ruled by 100 - ppm swings in CO2 and 300 - ppb swings in CH4.

Novelist Michael Crichton, in State of Fear, ends with an appendix comparing the theory of global warming to the theory of eugenics — the belief, prominently promoted by Nazis, that the gene pool of the human species was degenerating due to higher reproductive rates of «inferior» people.

Climate monitoring this century achieved new levels of precision — and it puts into doubt key assumptions of the theory of global warming.

Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing — in terms of economic socialism and environmental policy.

The origin of the theory of global warming (for it is just a theory) lies in taking the thermometer readings we happen to have from the last 100 years and massaging them in various ways.

Although I can not know this, I suspect that many chemists first learning of the GHG theory of global warming started from a base of scepticism, from the knowledge that very small concentrations need extraordinary care and interpretation.

It is a fascinating story with many aspects to it including the cliques and peer reviews you mention Steve McIntyre has been deconstructing Mann's theory graph by graph, proxy by proxy, formula by formula Heavyweight statisticians like Wegman are now getting on board and the theories are starting to unravel We find ourselves at a very interesting stage in the theory of Global Warming

The scientific theory of global warming has been disproven.

The scientific theory of global warming does not rely in any way on any consensus of scientists.

Geologist Dr. David Deming: «If the current cooling trend continues, the theory of global warming faces imminent extinction» — Deming: «The mean global temperature has not risen in 17 years and has been slowly falling for approximately the past 10 years» — «Falling temperatures are giving climate alarmists chills»

The scientific theory of global warming due to IR absorption and scattering due to CO2 is a mere hypothesis: this is false, as over 100 years of research into how the climate works and the physical properties of CO2 has shown.

Which means that the theory of global warming by the greenhouse effect is nothing but a pseudoscience used to deceive institutions and governments into irrational actions to stop a non-existent warming.

That fact is why I think so many people cleave to the CO2 theory of global warming, we can do something about that.

For me, that begins with people accepting that there is no hiding place left in the science — the overwhelming consensus of the vast body of scientists that study climate is that the trends we are seeing in the air, the oceans and in our ecosystems are entirely consistent with the theory of global warming, while the alternatives offered by sceptical scientists — even the much heralded role of the Sun — so far fail that test.

To be classified as rejecting, an article had to clearly and explicitly state that the theory of global warming is false or, as happened in a few cases, that some other process better explains the observed warming.

Correction: May 15, 1998, Friday An article on April 26 about a proposal to promote skeptical scientific views of the theory of global warming included an organization incorrectly among the proposal's advocates.

«Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.»

A noted «warmist» on Monday said scientists that believe the theory of global warming will «endorse Al Gore even though they know what he's saying is exaggerated and misleading.»

Your Human General Theory of Global Warming isn't close enough to observations to warrant replacing what we have.

So today you come here with your new Human General Theory of Global Warming.

«The Development of the «Greenhouse» Theory of Global Climate Change in Victorian Times.»

If the most commonly cited temperature sets can not detect the easy changes in the climate, then how is it going to detect the subtle changes associated with the theory of global warming.

Always useful to have a new theory on hand that explains why the Earth is decidedly not following the theory of global warming.