That year, influential primatologist Richard Wrangham proposed
a theory of human origins called the «cooking hypothesis.»
Not exact matches
Yet, thinkers from Edmund Burke to Russell Kirk have shown the deeply anti-conservative bases
of the social contract
theory of Lockean (and Hobbesian)
origin, one that is premised upon a conception
of human beings as naturally «free and independent,» as autonomous individuals who are thought to exist by nature detached from a web
of relationships that include family, community, Church, region, and so on.
Evolution and the Fall is a collection
of essays from a multi-disciplinary and ecumenical group
of authors, which sets out to address «a set
of problems that arise from the encounter
of traditional biblical views
of human origins with contemporary scientific
theories» (p. xv)-- not, one might add, in general, to answer them.
For those
of us who are comfortable with a
theory of evolution that acknowledges the common
origin of the
human and animal kingdoms, the scientific evidence that corroborates this syndrome
of dominance in the mythic Genesis accounts is
of special interest.
Through his knowledge
of Indian religion and culture, he did not submit himself to a racial
theory of any kind which will fit into the scheme
of «
human origin» advocated by the Naturwissenschaft school.
The term moderate evolution might therefore be applied to a
theory which simply inquires into the biological reality
of man in accordance with the formal object
of the biological sciences as defined by their methods and which affirms a real genetic connection between that
human biological reality and the animal kingdom, but which also in accordance with the fundamental methodological principles
of those sciences, can not and does not attempt to assert that it has made a statement adequate to the whole reality
of man and to the
origin of this whole reality.
Yet it stands head and shoulders above its nearest rival; its separateness inheres, not in
theories of its
origin and nature, but in the solid facts
of its worth and
of its impact upon
human society in the way both
of rebuke to the low and bestial and
of exaltation
of an impossible ideal, toward which, nonetheless, it has attracted and impelled.
What's more, since the only designing intelligence that could have played a role in the
origin and history
of life (including
human life) must have been nonhuman, my
theory of design detection is irrelevant and misleading for biology.
The irony is that evolutionists have no plausible
theory to pit against religious accounts
of human origins.
I've read material on one site (the site has 5K + pages,
of which I read less than 100) that uses Velikosky as part
of the starting point for a
theory of the
origin of the universe, and subsequently
humans, that is congruent with Genesis, but also both explains and predicts things not found in that account.
Birmingham, U.K. — A provocative new
theory about the
origin of «mad cow disease» and its
human counterpart stirred debate at the annual International Congress
of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology here yesterday.
In January, Harvard University evolutionary psychologist Max Krasnow and grad student Samuel Mehr published the first formal
theory on the
origins of lullabies in Evolution and
Human Behavior.
Intermixing does not surprise paleoanthropologists who have long argued on the basis
of fossils that archaic
humans, such as the Neandertals in Eurasia and Homo erectus in East Asia, mated with early moderns and can be counted among our ancestors — the so - called multiregional evolution
theory of modern
human origins.
Each stack is dedicated to a topic somehow related to his work in evolutionary
theory: the
origins of behavioral disorders, the epidemiology
of tuberculosis, the way modern
humans overrode Neanderthals.
As Freud would plumb the unconscious in his effort to «understand the
origin and nature
of human behavior,» so Einstein would set off on his lifelong quest for a unified field
theory that would encompass all physical phenomena.
The bill's text, if passed into state law, would protect teachers from discipline if they «help students understand, analyze, critique, and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses
of existing scientific
theories covered in the course being taught,» namely, «biological evolution, the chemical
origins of life, global warming, and
human cloning.»
The
theory may also be able to explain the
origin of the cognitive abilities that make
humans special.
A decade ago the leading
theory of modern
human origins held our species arose around 200,000 years ago in eastern Africa and (apart from short forays into Israel around 90,000 to 120,000 years ago) did not begin spreading out
of Africa in a major way until around 60,000 years ago.
Dr. Davis, the author
of Wheat Belly, was extremely captivating with his dissertation on the
origin of wheat and
theory that
humans should not eat any grains.
This lesson looks at the
origins of human life; Genesis account and the
theory of evolution.
As we approach a point where some
of the fundamental scientific questions are being resolved (e.g. the
human genome, a unified
theory and understanding
of the
origin of the universe), there has been an explosion
of interest in the lives
of great mathematicians and scientists.
At the Natural History Museum it has been instrumental in the development
of contemporary
theories of human evolution, including research that has traced the
origin of anatomically modern
humans to sub-Saharan Africa.
Thomas Turner takes inspiration from Chinese folklore, Greek mythology, Buddhism, Astronomy and Quantum
theories to illustrate poetic explorations
of universal
human origin and connectedness.