Sentences with phrase «theory of intelligence»

Based on Howard Gardner's theory of intelligence, these study tips can help you tailor your learning for your intelligence type.

Young Children's Motivational Frameworks and Math Achievement: Relation to Teacher - Reported Instructional Practices, but Not Teacher Theory of Intelligence

The Theory of Multiple Intelligences is a theory of intelligence that differentiates it into specific (primarily sensory) «modalities», rather than seeing intelligence as dominated by a single general ability.

Based on Howard Gardner»s theory of intelligence, the study tips in this slideshow can help you tailor your learning for your intelligence type (or Learning Language).

Excerpt: When considering Multiple Intelligences theory for educational practice, one must keep in mind that it is a theory of intelligence; it is neither a specific educational method nor approach.

In contrast, however, people who believe in a growth theory of intelligence want to challenge themselves to increase their abilities, even if they fail at first.

A theory of intelligence developed in the 1980s by Howard Gardner, professor of education at Harvard University.

Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Intelligence.

David Perkins, the co-director of Harvard University's Project Zero, remembers the first time he thought up his own theory of intelligence.

Likewise, Glickman (2001) posits that supervisors can help new teachers identify their strengths based on theories espoused by Gardner, who proposed multiple intelligences, and Sternberg, who developed a triarchic theory of intelligence.

A theory of intelligence must be consistent with these data; the pattern of data is not itself a theory.

Again, many empirical observations could prove useful to teachers — for example, that intelligence can be improved with sustained cognitive work — but there is no single accepted theory of intelligence.

According to the social theory of intelligence articulated by N. K. Humphrey and Jane Goodall, complex brains blossom in complex social settings; chimps and dolphins have to be smart to read the intentions of other chimps and dolphins.

Mather proposes «a foraging theory of intelligence.»

Multiple intervention studies of learners at different developmental stages have explored the effect of explicitly teaching students about an incremental theory of intelligence.

For decades, Dweck and her research teams have explored the associations between an incremental theory of intelligence and behaviors essential to healthy, mastery - focused learning.

Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention.

Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition.

This is important because (1) individuals with a «growth» theory are more likely to continue working hard despite setbacks and (2) individuals» theories of intelligence can be affected by subtle environmental cues.

Two studies explored the role of implicit theories of intelligence in adolescents» mathematics achievement.

«Theories of intelligence can be manipulated in real world contexts and have a positive impact on achievement outcomes,» Blackwell and Trzesniewski conclude.

Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict Achievement across an Adolescent Transition: A Longitudinal Study and an Intervention.

Blackwell, L., 2005, Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition ： A longitudinal study and an intervention, Unpublished manuscript.

Neither cultural identity nor theories of intelligence moderated the relationship between self - efficacy and depression.

We used a 3 - year cross-sequential longitudinal design to examine the relations between self - efficacy judgments in three different domains (academic, social, resisting negative peer influences), cultural identity, theories of intelligence, and depressive symptoms.

Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transtion: A longitudinal study and an intervention.

Not exact matches

For those of you who blindly follow Evolutionary Theory, you are the ones who should show a little intelligence and try researching Scientific Creationism, which is much more credible.

Arrogance in our culture, due to our higher intelligence, was injected by the theory of creation introduced by Ibrahim (Abraham) thousands of years ago.

The universe is 13.7 billion years old (cosmology: best estimate based on available data)- nothing to do with Atheism The earth is 4.5 billion years old (cosmology: best estimate based on available data)- nothing to do with Atheism Life emerged from non-life (Biogenesis theory... cause and process unknown)- nothing to do with Atheism Life spread and diversified through evolution (best available explanation)- nothing to do with Atheism Man evolved from common ape ancestor (evolution science)- nothing to do with Atheism Consciousness is an emergent property of the brain (neuroscience)- nothing to do with Atheism Emotions, memories and intelligence are functions of the brain (neuroscience)- nothing to do with Atheism Morals are emergent qualities of social animals (natural science)- nothing to do with Atheism

Sidney Hook captures this sense of the vulnerability of the human condition when he defines pragmatism as «the theory and practice of enlarging human freedom in a precarious and tragic world by the arts of intelligent social control it may not be [a] lost [cause] if we can summon the courage and intelligence to support our faith in freedom...» (CAP 193).

For all of his declared sympathy towards Dewey's approach, Rorty's neo-pragmatism can be said to contain «neither the creative ambition nor the engaged activism of Dewey's historical theory of inquiry and reflective intelligence which is in part, a theory of social reform and amelioration» (PAP 271).

What's more, since the only designing intelligence that could have played a role in the origin and history of life (including human life) must have been nonhuman, my theory of design detection is irrelevant and misleading for biology.

The demolishing of the geocentric theory, leading two centuries later to the end of anthropocentrism, left Man to think of himself as finally submerged and flattened by the «temporal» flow which his intelligence had discovered.

This makes sense in light of this theory, because the invention of agriculture was a fruit of human intelligence.

Moreover, recent research by Harvard psychologist Howard Gardner has devastated the optimistic assumptions of modern developmental psychology which has set the terms for much modern educational theory (see Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences [Basic Books, 1983] and The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach [Basic Books, 1991]theory (see Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences [Basic Books, 1983] and The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach [Basic Books, 1991]Theory of Multiple Intelligences [Basic Books, 1983] and The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach [Basic Books, 1991]-RRB-.

In any event, of all the theories which we may evolve concerning the end of the Earth, it is the only one which affords a coherent prospect wherein, in the remote future, the deepest and most powerful currents of human consciousness may converge and culminate: intelligence and action, learning and religion.

These grand theories are themselves no proof of great intelligence in the people who formulate them.

I have provided you with a proven human accomplishment that is fact and science has provided a model / theory of evolution that excludes this as being a possibility (an intelligence that purposely creates).

Bc current science theory does not allow for any idea of a creator even though we know and have proven that an intelligence (us) can and have created a new type of goat.

Thinking more of the latter, I can not help thinking of the theories we have heard over the years that human intelligence was somehow farmed into us long ago by some extraterrestial ent.ity.

After teaching in every grade from 1st to 12th in private Waldorf schools, he attended Harvard Graduate School of Education, studying multiple intelligence theory with Howard Gardner.

Howard Gardner is a psychologist and professor known for developing of the theory of multiple intelligences, which points out that a person has multiple intelligences distributed in various skills, such as logical reasoning, language, music, spatial sense, kinesthetic ability, and interpersonal and intrapersonal skills.

It would be against the laws of Western governments to do so, but it in theory you could still imagine governments using loopholes in the laws when national security is at stake to use intelligence services to implement such methods.

, 1968 Zick Rubin, «The Social Psychology of Romantic Love», 1969 Elliot Aronson, «Some Antecedents of Interpersonal Attraction», 1970 David C. Glass and Jerome E. Singer, «The Urban Condition: Its Stresses and Adaptations — Experimental Studies of Behavioral Consequences of Exposure to Aversive Events», 1971 Norman H. Anderson, «Information Integration Theory: A Brief Survey», 1972 Lenora Greenbaum, «Socio - Cultural Influences on Decision Making: An Illustrative Investigation of Possession - Trance in Sub-Saharan Africa», 1973 William E. McAuliffe and Robert A. Gordon, «A Test of Lindesmith's Theory of Addiction: The Frequency of Euphoria Among Long - Term Addicts», 1974 R. B. Zajonc and Gregory B. Markus, «Intellectual Environment and Intelligence», 1975 Johnathan Kelley and Herbert S. Klein, «Revolution and the Rebirth of Inequality: The Bolivian National Revolution», 1977 Murray Melbin, «Night as Frontier», 1978 Ronald S. Wilson, «Synchronies in Mental Development: An Epigenetic Perspective», 1979 Bibb Latane, Stephen G. Harkins, and Kipling D. Williams, «Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing», 1980 Gary Wayne Strong, «Information, Pattern, and Behavior: The Cognitive Biases of Four Japanese Groups», 1981 Richard A. Shweder and Edmund J. Bourne, «Does the Concept of the Person Vary Cross Culturally?»

In making his case for our unmatched minds, he also considers theory of mind — the ability to gauge what is going on in another person's head — as well as intelligence, culture and morality.

When Galton published his results, he ushered the theory of collective intelligence, or the «wisdom of crowds,» into the public conscience.

The memory - prediction framework is a theory of brain function that was created by Jeff Hawkins and described in his book On Intelligence.

In the past, theories of a link between low intelligence and criminal behavior, for example, sparked a movement of «coercive eugenics,» which resulted in forced sterilizations in the name of crime control.

The theory of multiple intelligence would produce a different definition to the traditional IQ definition.

Authors Carl Lindberg and Jan Lennartsson — the former an Adjunct Professor at Chalmers — carefully studied the moves of former NHL player Nicklas Lidström during games in an attempt to develop a mathematical theory on game intelligence in team sports — in this case ice hockey.