While both men sought to implement a dynamic view of experience, Whitehead chose to focus on the microcosmic level which resulted in his philosophy of organism, whereas Sullivan devoted his efforts to the particular realm of human existence which yielded his interpersonal
theory of psychiatry.
This essay attempts to make a contribution to that ongoing dialogue by corroborating some of the central features of Harry Stack Sullivan's interpersonal
theory of psychiatry in light of Alfred North Whitehead's philosophical insights about the nature of reality.
Not exact matches
Focusing on schizophrenia as a particular exemplar
of this change, Luhrmann examines the evolution
of psychiatry from psychoanalysis (mental illnesses are caused by emotional conflict) to a purely biomedical scheme (mental illnesses are caused by genes) to present
theories, which incorporate both the biological and the social causes (and treatments)
of mental illness.
By emphasizing this three-fold approach, Sullivan's
theory went well beyond Freud's by insisting that the domain
of psychiatry be augmented with insights contributed from social psychology and psychobiology.
One
of Sullivan's major contributions to
psychiatry was to expand the theoretical parameters for discussing personality
theory well beyond the limits
of Freud's intrapsychic realm into the arena
of interpersonal relations.
The misplaced concreteness
of mind language and body language and the impossibility
of interaction between domains whose very definitions preclude causal relations, become clear in the teeth
of all the
theories and institutions based on a dualistic ontology, e.g.,
psychiatry versus neurology versus psychoanalysis versus a holistic view
of humanity.
Included are varied specifics such as: economic
theory;
psychiatry; systems analysis; the growth
of bureaucracies; the science
of management; the development
of the democratic ideal; striving for universal education; personalism (fulfilling the earlier promise
of the Enlightenment); the rise and fall
of colonialism; and modem liberation movements.
The psychoanalytic
theories of Freud, Jung, and others who have laid the foundation for modern
psychiatry provide merely one approach to the understanding
of human behavior.
«I see
theory - based computational
psychiatry as a long - overdue effort to finally bring to
psychiatry the same rigorous mathematical tools that have so successfully shaped fields such as physics — enriched now with the capacity for computational simulations, which vastly expand the range
of problems that can be addressed mathematically.»
But not since Freud's pseudoscientific
theories early last century has
psychiatry claimed any broad theoretical basis for making sense
of our normal and abnormal feelings, thinking and social behaviours — the complexities at the heart
of being human.
«The vehicle
of success»: Theoretical and empirical perspectives on the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and
psychiatry: Psychology and Psychotherapy:
Theory, Research and Practice Vol 77 (2) Jun 2004, 255 - 272.
In this 2016 interview Dr. Irvin D. Yalom, professor
of psychiatry emeritus at Stanford University and author
of many therapy books, best known to me for his work The
Theory and Practice
of Group Psychotherapy, talks about why he has become a proponent
of online therapy.
John Bowlby had studied child
psychiatry and psychoanalysis and had the nerve to question popular
theories of the day, such as those advocated by John B. Watson.
Clinical Child Psychology and
Psychiatry is interested in advancing
theory, practice and clinical research in the realm
of child and adolescent psychology and
psychiatry and related disciplines.
Gardner is a Columbia University clinical professor
of child
psychiatry and he defends his
theory in his 749 pages
of «True and False Accusations
of Child Sex Abuse» (1992).
[1][3] There was initially a strong influence from psychoanalysis (most
of the early founders
of the field had psychoanalytic backgrounds) and social
psychiatry, and later from learning
theory and behavior therapy - and significantly, these clinicians began to articulate various
theories about the nature and functioning
of the family as an entity that was more than a mere aggregation
of individuals.