The Seller then sued the Brokerage on
the theory of vicarious liability for the breach of fiduciary duty and fraud by its salesperson Fogleman.
The hospital was named as a party defendant under
the theory of vicarious liability for the alleged negligence of Mizyed's treating physicians.
In order to succeed in a truck accident case against an employer, a plaintiff can rely on
the theory of vicarious liability.
The plaintiff sustained serious injuries in the accident and filed a personal injury case against the Department under
the theory of vicarious liability.
Allstate denies Araujo third - party coverage and brings two motions for summary judgment: one to dismiss Fernandes» claim as against Almeida (based on
a theory of vicarious liability), the other to dismiss Araujo's claim on the ground she was not entitled to coverage (as she drove the ATV without a proper licence).
You have been sued, even though you were not the driver, because of the legal
theory of vicarious liability.
Not exact matches
Although the
vicarious liability provision does not apply to harassment in employment, there is long - established case law
of the Tribunal which supports that
liability for harassment by an employee can be imposed on an organization respondent where the harassing employee forms part
of the «directing mind»
of the organization respondent, on the basis
of the «organic
theory of corporate
liability.»
«Respondeat superior» is a
vicarious liability theory that makes an employer liable for certain torts
of their employees.
When suing an employer for the conduct
of their employee, the Perrysburg nursing home abuse lawyer has to use the
theory of respondeat superior or
vicarious liability.
In general, the FTCA relates only to the
vicarious tort
liability of the entity, the United States government, on a respondeat superior
theory, arising from an agency or employment relationship some some other person or entity that acts on its behalf.
A copyright - owning plaintiff must still establish the elements
of infringement against the service provider — whether for direct infringement or under a
theory of secondary
liability (like
vicarious infringement)-- even if the defendant does not find itself within the DMCA safe harbor.