In summary, I think the metabolic
theory on cancer is really interesting and there's already some good evidence to support it.
But is there something to his new
theory on cancer?
Despite the 1996 call by The Lancet's editor to fund Duesberg's research on AIDS, and despite Scientific American's plea more than a decade later that the scientific community consider
his theories on cancer, Peter Duesberg is still fighting daunting scientific battles.
The New York Times recently published a long, detailed article about the history of modern cancer research, including Warburg's
theories on cancer, which are now becoming more widely accepted.
Not exact matches
An internal Hill & Knowlton memo from 1954 describes a booklet that employees circulated to doctors nationwide
on the «cigarette - lung
cancer theory.»
«Over the years, we've developed the
theory of «sequential cytotoxicity,» which simply means you give an initial attack
on the
cancer cell and then you give a second chemical attack,» Dimmock said.
«There are a lot of disparate
theories about what could have a profound impact
on aging and age - related processes, but at this point, we simply do not have evidence - based strategies to significantly change our life expectancy that come in the form of a pill,» says Ronald DePinho, professor of
cancer biology and president of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer C
cancer biology and president of the University of Texas MD Anderson
Cancer C
Cancer Center.
In 1986, after more than two years of research, Duesberg was so convinced that the HIV
theory of AIDS was dead wrong that he spent nine months writing his paper
on HIV (pdf) for
Cancer Research.
The study, to be published online in Cell
on Oct. 31, offers a new
theory of
cancer development and could open the door for new treatment targets.
Axel Huebl, who joined the team a year after Burau, has pushed the code to make optimal use of all of Titan's GPUs, winning him time
on Titan through DOE's Innovative and Novel Computational Impact
on Theory and Experiment (INCITE) program for his PhD research
on laser - driven radiation therapy of
cancer.
A full accounting of what is going
on under the hood still remains to be accomplished, but the most plausible mechanism appears to be increased stem cell activity, while effects
on cancer may involve a more active immune system - though that is only speculative
theory at this point.
To do so, they used existing data
on cancers treated by either MTD or LDM and modeled the competition between cells using evolutionary game
theory, a mathematical framework that uses Charles Darwin's concept of «survival of the fittest.»
«We have some new insight
on why this may be and are working to develop approaches based
on those
theories that will lead to better immunotherapy options for all types of breast
cancer,» said Lee.
Some researchers are examining the idea of scanning the fallopian tubes for signs of
cancer, based
on the emerging
theory that ovarian
cancer may actually originate there.
Check out these videos
on gut bacteria: Stool pH and Colon
Cancer Gut Feelings: Probiotics and Mental Health Preventing Ulcerative Colitis with Diet Carnitine, Choline,
Cancer and Cholesterol: The TMAO Connection The Leaky Gut
Theory of Why Animal Products Cause Inflammation
The underlying
theory here is that your
cancer cells love sugar, they grow by feeding
on sugar.
Therefore, this study out of the University of South Carolina looking at the effects of saturated fats
on colon
cancer is a very welcome study, and many more similar
theories about the «dangers» of high fat diets should be challenged and looked at more carefully, studying the lipid composition of the fats being consumed.
In addition to myself and Sally Fallon, our petition was signed by three worldclass scientists: Kilmer S. McCully, MD, father of the homocysteine
theory of heart disease, winner of the 1998 Linus Pauling Award and author of The Homocysteine Revolution and The Heart Revolution; Mary G. Enig, PhD, the world renowned biochemist and nutritionist who exposed the dangers of trans fats in the food supply back in the 1970s, vice president of WAPF, author of Know Your Fats and co-author of Eat Fat Lose Fat and Nourishing Traditions; and Galen D. Knight, PhD, a biochemist who has carried out pioneering research
on the role of vitalethine in humoral immunity and
cancer development.
While there is a long - held theoretic belief of an increased risk of
cancer, based
on the growth hormone's antiapoptotic and mitogenic effects, neither long - term nor short - term data support this
theory.
The data reported were based
on one patient and, despite 67 years of subsequent studies that failed to establish scientific support for this
theory, we are still faced with reluctance to treat men with testosterone supplementation for fear of giving them prostate
cancer or fueling prostate
cancer already present at a subclinical or microscopic level.
It's also an approach to fighting
cancer per certain
theories of
cancer development where
cancer cells are believed to thrive
on sugar.
This sounds very complicated to me, but it looks to me like there is a possibility that two incomplete proteins from different food sources (which in amino acid counts and percentage may in
theory add up to complete proteins) may not actually be broken down the same way by the body as an actual complete protein, or even the same time and therefore may have very different effect
on cancer.
This study out of the University of South Carolina looking at the effects of saturated fats
on colon
cancer is a very welcome study, and many more similar
theories about the «dangers» of high fat diets should be challenged and looked at more carefully, studying the lipid composition of the fats being consumed.
A pioneer in the field of applied medical anthropology, Sydney, along with his wife and co-author, Soma Grismaijer have written numerous groundbreaking books that provide new
theories, research, and revelations
on disease causation and prevention, including the internationally acclaimed book, Dressed To Kill: The Link Between Breast
Cancer and Bras.
I have based my diet
on Dr. Otto Warburgs Metabolic
Theory of
Cancer, the studies from Peter L Pedersen, Young Hee Ko, Thomas Seyfried, Dominic D'Agostino, etc, & several other clinical studies, here are some links for anyone interested in learning more.
My diet has been going well so far, I will allow myself to have a little extra carbs
on the 2 days after treatment (with the
theory that the extra glucose could help feed the chemo drugs to the
cancer cells), then I switch back to my whole food keto diet (with extra protein, because my body needs additional protein for recovery).
The
theory is that
cancer cells can only live
on the protein of solid food.
Then, from about 1985 to 2005, a great number of clinical trials were conducted
on the
theory that vitamin supplements prevent chronic degenerative diseases, like
cancer.
It has also been supported by
theories in
cancer development for cells that thrive
on sugar.
On page 211 of Brain Maker, Quote: «The
theory goes that since a high pH in the colon creates an environment that can promote cancerous growth, B. longum can help prevent colorectal
cancer by effectively lowering the intestinal pH.» Is this a correct statement?
Roberta Smith, who in 1993 wrote for the New York Times Weekend in Review, «This exhibition exemplifies what seems to have become the New Museum's house style: a display of rather antiseptic, Conceptual - based artworks organized around a theme that is top - heavy with
theory» continues to review the museum's exhibitions; Palestine remains under occupation; and while the cultural perception of AIDS has changed, from «gay
cancer» to an African epidemic, the disease rages
on world - wide.
First, that the hard risk sciences can only take us so far, because they are based
on assumptions (assumptions as we extrapolate toxicological findings
on test species to humans, or even the very the somatic
theory of
cancer itself, see Soto A.M., Sonnenschein, C..
Our lawyers have defended class actions and individual cases alleging personal injury and property damage from environmental contamination or exposure to chemical products based
on all types of legal
theories, including negligence, fraud, failure to warn, negligent misrepresentation, trespass, private and public nuisance and damage claims such as «fear of
cancer» and medical monitoring.