Not exact matches
And it's one of several cockamamie arguments advanced by viewers given a platform for their unconventional
theories in Room 237, an odd duck of a documentary about the
conclusions reached by five
different Kubrick fans upon very close analysis of The Shining.
The fact that
different ethical
theories would
reach different conclusion, however, does not mean that anything goes.
Different ethical theories would reach different conclusions about what the US emissions reductions s
Different ethical
theories would
reach different conclusions about what the US emissions reductions s
different conclusions about what the US emissions reductions should be.
Although
different theories of distributive justice would
reach different conclusions about what «fairness» requires quantitatively, most of the positions taken by opponents of climate change policies fail to pass minimum ethical scrutiny given the huge differences in emissions levels between high and low emitting nations and the enormity of global emissions reductions needed to prevent catastrophic climate change.
Although
different theories of distributive justice would
reach different conclusions about what «fairness» requires quantitatively, most of the positions taken by opponents of climate change policies fail to pass minimum ethical scrutiny given the huge differences in emissions levels between high and low emitting nations and individuals and the enormity of global emissions reductions needed to prevent catastrophic climate change.
Although there are some climate change ethical issues about which reasonable ethical principles would
reach different conclusions about what ethics requires, the following are
conclusions about which there is a strong overlapping consensus among ethical
theories.
Yet, as was the case for nations,
different theories of retributive and distributive justice would
reach different conclusions about each entity's fair share of safe global emissions.
We would agree that climate change raises some civilization challenging ethical questions about which
different respectable ethical
theories might
reach different conclusions about what should be done.
Although as we have seen what fairness requires is a matter about which
different ethical
theories might
reach different conclusions, a claim by almost any nation in the top 80 percent of global per capita emissions that it is already below its fair share of safe global emissions is highly unlikely to pass scrutiny on the basis of any conceivable ethically
theory.