Sentences with phrase «theory than proof»
Science is made up of more theory than proof, and i am not quick to believe any mortal / finite man saying he found the answers to the universe which is infinite.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ Not exact matches
These findings are quite new and lacking somewhat in modern proof, but makes a much more coherent and evident theory of our country's origin than an obscure mapmaker.
Evidence points to theories and they're reputable and so I trust those more than a religious person using the bible as the only source of proof for history, science, philosophy, ect...
Far more proof has been presented scientifically about evolution and the big bang theory than by believing in a god.
Theories change, evolution is old science with less than minimal proof yet we still hold on to it.
Ted Scambos of the University of Colorado at Boulder and colleagues analyzed the satellite imagery of the ice shelf's demise and found substantial observational proof for a theory of ice disintegration first proposed more than two decades ago.
«It could be longer than my lifetime before we have experimental proof that string theory is right or wrong.
The questions feature some challenging topics including rearranging fractional equations, expanding more than one brackets, manipulating and solving algebraic fractions with both addition and division, algebraic proofs that include some well known theories, as well as some rewriting of equation questions, factorising, completing the square and solving of quadratic equations and inequalities where the coefficient of x ^ 2 is greater than one, as well as where the question is set up through scenarios, finding the nth term of quadratic sequences and working with the Fibonacci sequence, working with quadratic simultaneous equations, composite and inverse functions, and a variety of graph transformation questions.
More than ever, schools need the proof and evidence provided by solid theory, concrete studies, practical tools, and real results from any strategy that claims to improve learning.
As I've said on several occasions here and elsewhere, the major problem with global warming believers» enslavement to the «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» phrase is that it is not in any way proof of an arrangement between between skeptics and industry officials involving payments made for false climate assessments.
And wouldn't those talking points pack a fatal punch with reporters if you could say a Pulitzer winning investigative reporter discovered a leaked coal industry memo which was proof for skeptic climate scientists being paid to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact.»
However, Kelly Sims Gallagher is not merely a coincidentally handy local Tufts University professor, she has direct connections with the same set of leaked industry memo phrases seen within the growing numbers of California global warming lawsuits — the «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» strategy phrase and the «older, less - educated males» / «younger, lower - income women» targeting phrases — which are widely repeated elsewhere as proof that the fossil fuel industry «pays skeptic climate scientists to participate in misinformation campaigns» undermining the certainty of catastrophic man - caused global warming (despite those memos being worthless as evidence, but that is another matter).
Without a continual challenge, fringe science like AGW theory will be allowed to get away with less than rigorous practice, such as the proof of the tropospheric hotspot by wind measurements.
This is the problem: just as creationists cite bible chapters as proof of their «scientific» theories; journalists are are citing what are no more than opinions, often from idealogues, to refute data and analysis.