Sentences with phrase «there against the fact»

Not exact matches

Is the fact that tech isn't 50 - 50 men and women due to bias against women or are there truly other factors, unrelated to bias, that keep the numbers different?

There's also the fact Disney's upcoming movie and TV streaming service is likely to compete against Hulu for customers, but the ownership stake may open both services up to future bundled plans.

While Avnet declined to discuss the number of pre-orders Indigenous Media has seen for Sickhouse on Vimeo, he said he is optimistic when it comes to the movie's online revenue potential despite the fact that there isn't much of a benchmark level for the movie to compete against.

The fact is, there has been a ton of money made / performance driven by, for example, «long Russell 2k» vs «short USTs» / «short ED,» or being long equities «value» against short equities «growth» since back mid 2016 when we began seeing positioning pivot this way (and accelerating post-Trump).

Regardless of the fact that the USA is not acting unilaterally as our left wing media is trying to sell us they are; there are 38 countries that have supplied troops and only three European countries that voted against us, with all three involved in the Oil for Food Scandal.

The letter also points to the fact that there more than 160 antidumping and countervailing duties in place against 37 countries and 25 categories of basic steel products.

I'm sure there are plenty of Christians who are still willing to go against their Lord's teachings and attack people they claim are their God's enemies when in fact they really are their own enemies and they are just using their Gods name to mask their vile hatred and wicked hearts.

Fortunately there are no facts against God at the moment and there are no facts relative to an alternate reason for existence from the godless.

In fact, there are attacks against copts on a regular basis (including during these protests) that are never reported by mainstream media.

To say that evolution was «proven» 100 years ago is to disregard the fact that even Darwin doubted his own contentions (as he states in origin of species), for every bit of scientific evidence for evolution there is scientific evidence against it.

the bible never says anything against abortion - in fact, there's an abortion recipe in the bible, so if anything God seems to be pro-abortion.

In fact, if there's anything on earth that unites the Church's adversaries — all of them except for the Muslims, anyway — the teaching against contraception is probably it.

Against those who depict her father's religious decision in opportunistic colors, there is also the fact that he became a Catholic, a distinctly downmarket connection at that time in England.

Its an absolute fact, they need to be non tax exempt for there non minority back door policies that heavily discriminate against those of color!

The Ethics Committee dropped its final charges against Gingrich not long before he resigned as speaker, despite finding that Gingrich had in fact violated one rule by repeatedly using a political consultant paid by GOPAC to develop the Republican political agenda, because there was no evidence he was continuing to do so.

In point of fact, there were many strictures against «gender fluidity» in the ancient Near East (e.g., men who assumed the role of women were generally denigrated).

If there is a God and there is just as much for as against, But lets say there is a God and he made everything Including you and He gets to make the rules because lets face it hes a lot bigger then you, So unfortunately he only wants those who believe in him based on the information given, Lets look at the facts based on the Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads too.

There remains the question as to whether adopting the perspective that locates human beings within the whole creaturely world, albeit as the most valuable part of it, would in fact work against the interests of the poor.

He answers that the fact that chemical conditions make it possible for life to appear, with growth and reproduction, means that there is that in reality that calls forth life and strives against the forces of inertia.

In fact, I've been taught that homosexuality is just about the worst kind of sin that there is, one we ought to protest against and make laws about.

For, when the Good took up its place at the goal where the reward beckons or where the Good itself beckons to a man, the Good against its will would then be forced to see and to put up with the fact that there were two paths, and two men bent on them; the one be-cause he willed the Good in truth, and humbly but gladly followed its beckoning; the other because fear drove him thence.

My second observation is simply that, in light of the fact that the «gay community» is not separate from the «Christian community» and that there are many like Justin who identify as both Christian and gay, we have to move past the culture war mentality that pits these two groups against one another.

From this fact arose all sorts of legal provisions — prohibitions against removing one's neighbor's landmark (there were no surveyors with compasses in those days or recorded deeds of landholdings), injunctions to bring the first fruits of the land as a gift to God, provisions for observing the harvest festivals, ordinances as to slaves and «the stranger within the gates.»

But I was uneasy, and when I did venture to suggest that there was, in fact, a troubling aroma of idolatry wafting within our breezy confidences of the man, I was kindly informed that» being composed of Christian believers» the forum was in no danger of falling into sin against that great and primary commandment.

For example, against both dualism and reductionistic determinism and in favor of the pancreationist, panexperientialist view that the actual world is made up exhaustively of partially self - determining, experiencing events, there is considerable evidence, such as the fact that a lack of complete determinism seems to hold even at the most elementary level of nature; that bacteria seem to make decisions based upon memory; that there appears to be no place to draw an absolute line between living and nonliving things, and between experiencing and nonexperiencing ones; and that physics shows nature to be most fundamentally a complex of events (not of enduring substances).

The fact is that while he had a hatred for Jews and killed them, and a hatred for Catholic Priest who stood against him and killed them too,... does it matter the «why» there were dead bodies?

Then there is the sad and, to my mind, unmistakable fact that people who have adopted the so - called «presumption against war» tend to get things wrong, time and again: as the U.S. bishops got the dynamics of the Cold War wrong in their 1983 pastoral letter, «The Challenge of Peace»; as most religious leaders and intellectuals got it wrong in predicting a Middle East Armageddon in the first Gulf War and the recent Iraq War.

Against Goldhagen, Littell wants to defend «senior scholars» who have spent decades pressing the case for serious research of the Holocaust «long before any young writer or eager publisher could capitalize on the brute fact that today «there's no business like Shoah business.

Federation would help «Protestants keep power over against Catholics and secularists; there is no getting away from the fact that there were such motivations, among nobler ones.

Mention of that great saint brings to mind what he said about change: he sharply cautioned against changing law — any law — even when some improvement is possible, unless there is some «urgent necessity or substantial and obvious benefit», since «the mere fact of change in law itself can be adverse to the public welfare and lessen the restraining power of the law».

Their position does not in fact preclude a concern for, or efforts to achieve, the common good, but it is a warning against supposing that there is one common way for all groups to relate to the nation and the common good of its people.

There is flexibility that is good in the fact that each generation rebels against its predecessor, but this very fact keeps moral gains from being secure.

Their hostility to Ali was increased by the fact that there was scarcely an Arab family which had not lost some of its members to Ali's sword in fighting against Islam; for instance, three relatives of Mu`awiya were killed by Ali himself in the battle of Badr.

But even those who fault Vashti for her stand against her husband and king can't deny the fact that without Queen Vashti, there would never be a Queen Esther, and that ultimately, it would take the defiance of two queens to save the Jews — Esther by appearing before the king, and Vashti, by refusing to.

Against this latter argument there is one decisive factor: the fact that the «eyewitnesses» would have had to be quite different in interest and concern from any men whose influence we can trace in the synoptic tradition.

But the very fact that the question of the death of the word «God» can be put shows that this word is still there because of man's very protest against it.

First, in reporting widespread child abuse in Brooklyn's community of Orthodox Jews, there was not the «selective outrage» which animates the paper against criminous Catholic clerics, whose numbers are in fact proportionally much smaller than other religious and professional groups.

Ironically, the very fact the bishops are making these «bold» statements is a testament to Israel's essential decency and humanity» the bishops know there will be no serious consequences or massive reprisals against Christians in Israel for «speaking out,» whereas any similar Christian criticism» or even questioning» of an Arab government in the region, or Islamic extremism, would» well, we all saw what happened after Regensburg.

Not many of the cases have held against street preachers or against Christian preaching being classified as hate speech... but the very fact that these cases are being brought and that there are real cases of teachers being sacked or from the health service... I think it is under threat, yes.»

The isolationist party, best known by the name of America First, was in fact a jumble of people with a whole variety of agendas: there were those who believed that the United States should have no truck with Europe and its wars, there were socialists who found nothing to choose among the imperialists on both sides, and there were those who believed that Germany's was not necessarily the wrong side to be on, this latter group itself being a kind of odd amalgam of Anglophobes, anti-Semites who said that the war against Hitler was merely a Jewish war, and immigrant German patriots.

There's an idea that there is, in fact, a fourth branch of government that provides a final check and balance against power: the pThere's an idea that there is, in fact, a fourth branch of government that provides a final check and balance against power: the pthere is, in fact, a fourth branch of government that provides a final check and balance against power: the press.

Lipstadt's polemic against relativism and deconstruction is on an entirely different level - not about the specific truth of this or that situation but about whether there are ascertainable facts or truths at all.

(5) In the fifth criticism there is a protest against any attempt to affirm the existence of God which ignores the fact of massive excess evil in the world.

(This is sufficient to show that in relation to this fact there is no difference between an immediate contemporary and a successor; for over against a self - contradiction, and the risk involved in giving it assent, an immediate contemporaneity can yield no advantage.)

It seems that there are further basic arguments which Hartshorne could level against Craighead's claim, charging, for example, that it is a fallacy of composition to assert that because we can conceive of the nonexistence of some things we can conceive of the nonexistence of all things.4 Craighead has in fact anticipated that fallacy charge as it applies in this issue (ECCC 122f).

Notwithstanding the fact that there is no easy formula for knowing how and to what immediate ends God is moving in the restless flux of happenings, the Christian confesses that the hand of God is behind, within, and against whatever transpires in the universe.

This isn't just a vestige of Old Testament thought; this is a statement of fact and a warning to all that «the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom» and that there is a judgement coming for those who continue to rebel against God.

Anyway, the fact that there are flood myths all over the world is actually evidence for the historicity of the flood event, not proof against it.

If there is any doubt that this is the case, it is further evidenced by the fact that the prohibition against homosexuality resurfaces in the new covenant (NT), and is articulated in three new separate prohibitions.

They say, in the words of Chillingworth, «There are popes against popes, councils against councils, some fathers against others, the same fathers against themselves, a consent of fathers of one age against a consent of fathers of another age, the Church of one age against the Church of another age:»... I shall admit that there are in fact certain apparent variations in its teaching... I shall attempt to explain them to the exculpation of that teaching in point of unity, directness, and consistency Introduction to the Development of Doctrine,There are popes against popes, councils against councils, some fathers against others, the same fathers against themselves, a consent of fathers of one age against a consent of fathers of another age, the Church of one age against the Church of another age:»... I shall admit that there are in fact certain apparent variations in its teaching... I shall attempt to explain them to the exculpation of that teaching in point of unity, directness, and consistency Introduction to the Development of Doctrine,there are in fact certain apparent variations in its teaching... I shall attempt to explain them to the exculpation of that teaching in point of unity, directness, and consistency Introduction to the Development of Doctrine, 1846