Is
there anything false in the ad?
Not exact matches
There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is
false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for
anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
There has also been a
false movement in Christianity where the Lord is no longer allowed to «saith»
anything.
It is only those who wounded your «Wounded Wonder Child» who gave you the
false idea that
there is
anything wrong with your wonderful Self.
It would be possible in itself to do that, without asserting
anything totally
false thereby, because nothing would have been asserted excepted that «
there is nothing but being», and that «regarding absolutely
anything that can be thought of, at least some statement can be made, common to and valid for all beings».
And you didn't answer my question either And what are you even talking about, I don't believe that
there is
anything false in the Bible, prove me wrong
No, obviously, Lake of Fire does not annihilate
anything for the
false Prophet and etc are ALREADY
there seemingly very alive.
This does not for a moment imply a
false passivity in human life, as if
there were nothing whatever that we can do about
anything.
He isnt saying
anything false, those players are
there!
Her claim that «
there's no direct correlation between a racial group and
anything in the human genome» is
false.
Not to be «conspiracy theorist» or
anything, but it is true that the animal agriculture industry has been putting a lot of
false information out
there about plant foods, especially the one's becoming really popular, and even a staple, amongst vegans.
Is
there anything a beauty vlogger likes more than a colorful, contoured eye with lots of liner and
false eyelashes?
@Roscoe: If indeed CIBC gave you
false information, may I suggest you talk to them and find out if
there is
anything they could do to make up for their mistake.
Then when we discovered that all the information disclosed turned out to be
false (we were deceived and outright lied to about all aspects of the dog), and
there turned out to be undisclosed health challenges with the dog on top of it, we were continually promised repayment for the many additional expenses we should not have had to incur, but we didn't receive
anything.
Yet the NY Times and WaPos of the world would like us to believe that such reporting * is * their forte... yet... they've really done little (if
anything) to expose as
false claims that
there are two legitimate scholarly sides to the «climate debate», and at times add credibility to claims that indeed perhaps the climate science side is the side playing games (climategate coverage, etc) rather than the McI's, Wegman's, and RP [J / S] rs of the world.
It is a
false equivalency to say that in this scientific dialogue that
there are «two sides», unless you mean one side that is backed by 200 years of science and physical observations and the other side which is basically saying «no it isn't» without
anything to support their nay - saying.