Sentences with phrase «there as a unity»

«The equation could not begin unless it were poised meaningfully to its historic progress, but neither could the higher unity be there as a unity... unless at all times the Equation and its potential were relative to the necessity whose other name is GOD.

Not exact matches

As for interbank worldwide payments, there is a lack of unity.

Besides the unity of creativity and creature contained in an occasion, there is a conjunction of a physical and a mental pole (RM 118) taking place as a process of supersession (IS 240f).

But they're willing to lay it down because, as we all know, there's nothing more satisfying than feeling the unity of our own lives.

But to maintain an ethnically homogeneous church in a context in which there are Christians of many ethnicities impresses many as a failure to display the unity in Christ that was certainly a deep concern of Wesley.

While we do not have any exegetical basis for calling them «heretics,» we nevertheless can see their teachings as dangerous for Christian unity without condemning them to hell (They might end up there, but it's not our job to send them).

But there is also unity as well as variety in the theology of the New Testament.

We are hopefully free from the illusion that there can be a «biblical theology» in the sense that all the themes and ideas present in the Bible can be brought to a harmonious unity, which can then be reaffirmed as true Christian theology.

There is no necessary unity among all these forms of dynamic existence, so far as we can see.

As important as doctrinal statements are, there is a more excellent way to achieve church unitAs important as doctrinal statements are, there is a more excellent way to achieve church unitas doctrinal statements are, there is a more excellent way to achieve church unity.

The unity of the person is reflected in the Psalms — but the person there is both individual and corporate just as the «body» of Christ is individual in Jesus and corporate in us.

Polk's notion of God emphasizes features drawn from Whitehead's consequent nature of God, whereas Pannenberg appeals to the unity of the immanent and economic Trinity as grounds for denying that there is ultimately development in God.

Any way until now there is no old or new things are as it is but rather divided among it self... but I pray to God they would keep the unity in their hearts, minds and souls for the sake of God and Yemen.

It is not easy to pin - point what constitutes the scientific endeavor as such, but that there is a unity and continuity which holds together the whole developing scientific exploration I think there can be little doubt.

Note the implication in the first clause there: There are «those who no longer see the full, visible unity of the Church as an achievable goal.&rthere: There are «those who no longer see the full, visible unity of the Church as an achievable goal.&rThere are «those who no longer see the full, visible unity of the Church as an achievable goal.»

There would, accordingly, be various units of process in the universe with the larger units generally incorporating the smaller units within themselves, But each unit, from the smallest (a given actual entity) to the largest (the divine community) would be structured the same way, i.e., as a self - sustaining unity in totality of functioning parts or members.

Just as we may argue that there is a unity of aims, objectives and approach underlying and generating empirical science, however greatly scientific beliefs may change and develop from age to age, so we may argue that there is an analogous unity underlying and generating Christian belief and practice.

They teach us that there can be no such thing as community without unity of consciousness, collective action free of individual greed, humility and respect for the other and as much concern for the other person's welfare as for our own.

For a while there, it appears as though Whitehead may have fashioned a theory of a virtual unity» unifying the initial data received into an objective datum to which, perhaps, conceptual feelings could then be applied.17

The entry point into the debate has varied, but there has always been an awareness in the Church that the search for visible unity and the communion the churches seek, is connected inextricably with the authority with which the Church interprets and lives up to its traditions, but also the way in which we act as Christians in the world.

«The social vitality of a nation,» writes Buber, «and its cultural unity and independence as well, depend very largely upon the degree of social spontaneity to be found there.»

When there is this complete unity, singleness, fullness of experiencing in the relationship, then it acquires the «out - of - this - world» quality which therapists have remarked upon, a sort of trance - like feeling in the relationship from which both client and therapist emerge at the end of the hour, as if from a deep well or tunnel.

There is, for this reason, a legitimate connection between the nation and socialism which supports rather than obstructs the international character of socialism as a force for world unity and peace.

(got cut off on the 1st part of the post...) All of us were there for the same reason... to come together as the body of Christ; to love, praise and worship God in unity, to confess our sins and ask for forgiveness, to offer forgiveness and to reconcilliation, to share in the Body and Blood of the Lamb, to love one another and to take the commandment back out into the world to «Love and serve the Lordl».

James Bradley makes a valiant attempt to solve within Whitehead's basic terms the problem Jones has suggested needed a solution, but there is little doubt Jones would regard Bradley's solution as too heavily» reliant upon numerical unity», and therefore abstract.

Then there are other theologians who approach theology as a way to understand and articulate our essential unity and bring a great diversity of people together.

Among the Indians and Greeks alike, there were attempts to transcend consciousness or to destroy it so as to recover a primeval condition of unity with the divine.

Is there something that will permit us to grasp this phenomenon as a unity, are there instances that are characteristic of it, especially in the context that has been introduced here?

Thus whereas in the first case there is a general failing to give nature, as the realm of finitude, contingency, chance and decay, its due place as a condition of mind as well as a constitutive element in the general scheme of things, in the second case there is an equally important failure to account for the origins of the unity of rational mind in nature.

Just as on the side of matter there is quantitative differentiation, approaching precise distinction, so on the side of consciousness there is qualitative differentiation approaching intensive unity.

There the crucified Christ, now risen with God, is affirmed as the source of the love which overcomes all human or cosmic threats to unity with God.

There were real powers at work on men as they contemplated the majesty of nature or felt the impulse towards tribal unity or responded to the demand for moral improvement.

We know in advance that there can be no ultimate distinction, for both must be understood as participating in a more inclusive unity.

And as Dr Reid rightly indicates, the accusation that to allow unfettered use of the «old rite» will bring disunity (one of the modernist parrot cries reported by the Herald) is a nonsense: «No», he wrote, «whatever liturgical books are used, there will be substantial unity amid legitimatediversity, provided the rites are celebrated as the Church intends them to be celebrated.

Sometimes one major god might be thought of as having won the ascendancy, and then he became a king of the gods, but often there was no clear unity or system.

As the church and mission began to encounter each other and move closer, there developed within the missionary movement, the convictions and impulses for Christian unity.

Although it is true that «more theological consensus is needed to restore unity than to preserve unity» and that there is consequently a certain difference between classical reception and present - day ecumenical reception, Edward Kilmartin is correct in saying that «as in the case of Nicaea 1, Chalcedon and the rest of the so - called ecumenical councils of the first millennium, reception took place through a more or less complicated process.»

Careful reading of Book Z of the Metaphysics, to be sure, makes clear that there are at least two conceptions of substantial form in Aristotle's philosophy: one more Platonic in character whereby the form possesses its own substantial unity and communicates that unity to the material elements (stoicheia) from the outside, so to speak; the other apparently originating with Aristotle himself according to which the substantial form comes into being as it unifies the elements into an organic whole (cf. TKT 67 - 120).

Gunter's discussion of the interdependence of the poles in the apparent conflicts in Bergson's thought serves two purposes: as indicated above, he tries to show that the charge of irrationalism is improperly made against Bergson, and he argues that there is a fundamental unity in Bergson's philosophy.

I imagine that there will be some angry voices that start to pop up here before long, and I will probably say things I shouldn't as well... but hopefully we can all learn from (and with) each other in love, so that we move toward unity.

Guess old Islam was the first to be a cause for your unity from the dates of the crusaders... Then in modern history there came the «Nazi's» then came the «Communists» but today you have the «New Islam»... they were those who united you and got you to abolish slavery and made of you equal as it is today in Black and White!?

In fact, the individual's consciousness of salvation occurs only in those moments where there is a sense of belonging to a larger body comprised of others and the entire universe as they are collectively being brought into unity by God.

But the decisive stages of this evolution are just those in which, beyond a new and purely «social» organization, there emerges the constitution of organisms that, on a higher level from that of the unities they have integrated, can again count as true unitary beings.

Of course not all Calvinists will support your summary 100 % — after all, there are numerous denominations in the Calvinist environment (as there are in other groups), and it is really not because of the unity among themselves!

Jesus» ethics are set forth as the conditions of entrance into the coming kingdom, but in reality there is only one condition — complete obedience to the will of God.23 Both the radical ethical teachings of Jesus and his proclamation of the kingdom find their unity in the crisis of decision before God.

Paul blessings as i shared with Christine it is a personal relationship with Jesus when Jesus called his disciples he said follow me not the church not man.I belong to 2 churchs and i keep in touch with a couple indirectly and minister from time to time they are all different styles and different doctrines and in each of them i have people i care about they are family to me brothers and sisters in the Lord and i can go there and feel at home we sing and worship the Lord and hear the word together its awesome.I used to feel that i did nt fit in now i can fit in anywhere because where we go he goes with us.There is unity in Christ even though we may differ in doctrine.brentnz

Although Jewish unity seems at least as remote as Christian unity, there have been some evidences in recent years of an ecumenical movement in Judaism.

Despite the indications, just noted, that there are occasions at various levels, such as subelectronic, electronic, and molecular, his most detailed analysis indicates that the larger units are societies of mutually external smaller entities and do not have the unity of actual occasions.

In non-living things visible to the naked eye there is no clear distinction between whole and part, and no dynamic unity, as though something like a sequence of experiences were influencing the parts.

On the other hand, there is the being constituted by this becoming, the unity produced by this unification, the concrete satisfaction, or what has been called the «concretum» of this concrescence.4 The concrescence «begets» the concretum in this metaphysical sense that it produces it as a formally distinct aspect of its own actuality.