They compare apple products to anything and usually with
there biased opinion apple wins.
Not exact matches
The news is everywhere, and much of it comes with an
opinion attached — and
there's nothing necessarily wrong with that, so long as any
bias or conflict is made clear.
There is the ongoing problem of
biased representation in the media, with plenty of space given to the atheistic
opinions of Hawking and Dawkins, and little if any coverage given to the promotion and integration of science which takes place within the context of the Church.
It doesn't matter how you spin it, you are
biased in your
opinion and that is all it is...
there is no evidence outside of the bible that Cain and Abel even existed.
Especially those trying ignorantly pointing fingers at religious people when
there is no evidence to back it up yet besides their
bias opinions.
Over
there, with no
bias, you can give your
opinion and and publish your own polls so americans can vote.
Lastly, «look around» is also not proof but confirmation
bias that because
there are some places on earth that is so pretty,
there must have been something to make that pretty instead of the
opinion you hold.
Some pretty balanced
opinions there from the Spurs fans and some pretty
biased rants from us Liverpool fans.
@Gunfest,
there is no point having an
opinion if your going to be
biased.
On the aggregate however,
there is a way to get the most out of people's individual
opinions, no matter how internally
biased they are.
The FTC requires bloggers to disclose whenever
there is a financial interest or
bias related to a recommendation or whenever a blogger's
opinion may be financially motivated in any way.
One of the few sequels that surpasses the original in every way, Empire Strikes Back is one of the closest examples to a perfect film that
there is, and anyone who disagrees is either an imbecile or (and most likely this) has formed a
biased opinion that Star Wars is a nerd series that they are above (so an imbecile).
There is no room for
opinion or
bias.
We observed that the teachers were in general unaware of robots and hence
there was a technological
bias associated with their
opinions.
Although at times, I have been accused of being
biased toward this remarkable species, I am certainly not unique in my
opinion —
there are at least 40 percent of households throughout the United States that share their home with kitties.
You were incessantly trolling on that game since it was announced, sharing your
biased opinion with toxic Xbox fanboys that those excited for it were a «circle jerk», trying to pass it off as a TLoU clone etc, etc. only to be proven utterly wrong and yet weeks after its release I'm still playing the game because its world and combat is so good and addicting, and I'm far, far from the only one (even if I was done with the game in a week,
there are much better multiplayer games worthy of my time than Conan).
While I don't have a personal relationship with the developer or harbor any sort of unexplainable
bias that would affect my professional
opinion of one of their games,
there's no question that I'm an unabashed Housemarque fanatic.
I'm tired of the
bias on the facebook staff silencing any
opinions they don't agree with and pushing a left wing agenda...... someone aught to walk in
there and teach them... Read more»
Yeah
there is a
biased opinion when it comes to this and many gamers and critics often shy away from what is a big problem.
There are far worse things being done by «scientists» with an agenda, already
biased opinions that leapfrog onto anything they see as backing up their psychoses or appeasing their right - wing think - tank supporters.
I agree that
there are
biases toward the center of gravity of the community's
opinion.
Though
there is nothing wrong with scientists being political as everyone has an
opinion on political issues, the line is crossed when that political idology dictates what the scientist does in their research when it
biases their data and conclutions.
In science
there shouldn't be
bias, just considered
opinion taking into account all the facts and your own previous knowledge.
On the surface, however,
there is good evidence that at least one reviewer had a
biased opinion (with or without legitimate gripes, his statement clearly indicates a
bias), and at least some anecdotal evidence that the editor chose to let this color his decision.
There are some who have identified themselves and who I have respect for regarding former
opinions on previous issues as debated herein, but it is clear that emotion and left - wing
bias seem to be the predominant driving forces behind most
opinions as expressed herein thus far, and that is not necessarily a bad thing, because fighting criminal activity should be something that we all do willingly out of a shared sense of maintaining community standards, such that they are.
I am trying to understand your reply... Why would you recommend a market to someone asking for advice based on your
biased opinion simply because you live
there with no facts to back it up?