Sentences with phrase «there by choice»

Yet many will remain unable to afford buying in urban neighborhoods and be forced to consider less expensive outer suburbs — a big change from the past when people moved there by choice to find newer and bigger homes, McIlwain explained.

If either dies during such constraint, as a result of a failure of care by their «management» then that management should be equally liable as the owner of a factory who allows a driver of a forklift truck to plunge over a faulty railing — more so, perhaps, as the factory analogy supposes that the driver is there by choice and could, hypothetically, leave at any time.

It is also unfortunate that the people in these MHPs are not driven to live there by choice but by socioeconomic status.

But most here are there by choice, escaping hungry conditions in the countryside to find opportunities and work.

These positive developments occur more often when everyone at that school is there by choice.

In a whole - school magnet, the entire school population is there by choice.

But they may not be there by choice.

Nowadays I shop there by choice, there is always a treasure to be found.

The key to it working in these places is that everyone involved is there by choice and chooses to live like that.

Not exact matches

(There's a whiff of moral superiority to Freshii's filing, too: «In stark contrast to the sugar - heavy desserts sold by the Plaintiffs, Freshii branded restaurants provide quick, fresh and nutritious meal choices to customers around the world.»)

If there is not more clarity by that point, it is likely that a large number of insurers will abandon the market and the 12.2 million Americans in the exchanges would be left with little choice for coverage in 2018.

There were five choices to choose from («Not at all,» «Slightly,» «Somewhat,» «Very much» and «Completely»), but the module could clearly be dismissed with by clicking on an «X» button.

While the recovery in the real estate market will be driven by what happens in the provincial economy, there are some choice areas to consider.

«There is a unique opportunity today to significantly change the health trajectories of the millions of men and women who continue to smoke by offering them a better choice,» PMI CEO André Calantzopoulos said in a statement.

If you are purchasing a baby carrier then you may feel overwhelmed by the many choices out there.

Then, sort by topic to see if there are any correlations between great performance, and topic choice.

And there's no precise equation for determining how entrepreneurs should pay themselves, as the right choice varies dramatically by your business type, age, financial health, and more.

Your local supply is 100 % determined by the geography of where you live, there is no choice.

Mails were replaced by emails, wagons and carriages were replaced by cars and trucks but the banking system remained obsolete and for the most part, there was no will and resolve to change the system because they have dominated and controlled the system for so long that they get to do whatever they like and people do not have a choice.

Yes, there are people who, by choice, do not have Facebook, Twitter or Google + accounts.

With the markets still at all time highs, these choices are seemingly becoming more and more difficult to come by but despite these lofty levels there are still some individual names that are trading at good to decent levels.

If you've never delved into the world of stocks, bonds and mutual funds before, it's easy to feel overwhelmed by the sheer volume of investment choices that are out there.

For Laura Ingraham, there was no choice but to apologize to Parkland school shooting activist David Hogg for her foolish tweet regarding the 17 - year - old being rejected by several colleges.

But if the choice was being made by the central bankers and academic economists who attended a closely - watched conference in Jackson Hole, Wyo. over the weekend, there would be another name very much in the mix — and quite possibly the front - runner.

That's the real truth, and that's why people are fascinated by other ways which have remained less disturbed by the Gospel that really grips this society, which is that there should be no constraint on individual consumer choice in goods or morals.

There is a choice of what to wear each day and that choice is treated certain ways by an ever Fd up society

It seems to me that rationally, there's not so much a problem with the concept of Hell, presented by you or by David Hayward, it's actually a differing of opinion of what constitutes bad choices and when it's appropriate to invoke the idea of intense, endless regret.

Regardless of your beliefs and views, is it not tasteless for CNN to run this as their lead story on Easter morning??? Americans are appalled by anything done to insult Islam believers, so why is this felt to be appropriate??? There is nothing wrong with the article, but its timing makes it a poor and inflammatory choice of journalism, and would be taken as «persecution» if was directed toward any other belief system.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

BTW there's nothing wrong with that, it's the smartest way to live by choosing what works for you in your time and place... unless you're an atheist making their own choices, apparently, then suddenly it's «amoral and devoid of the ONE truth» religion offers.

Message to all anti-gay believers out there, your views on homosexuals are rooted in the belief that it is a behavior or a choice, yet you refuse to be corrected by someone who actually is gay and would know, how Christ like are you being that you should refuse to listen and discriminate according to your own assumptions?

Moses also warned them first what would happen if they disobeyed it was there choice to repent or to act in there own strength.In regard to the last statement the Government justifys it by saying that it is the mother has the right to abort her children.

Whenever the text turns apocalyptic, as it does this week, there would seem to be only two choices: either take it literally and join the lucrative doomsday machine of late - night, splendidly coifed Christian psychics, or begin your best apologetic backpedaling — cheered on by Bishop John Spong.

There can be no doubt that God makes decisions a propos of the disjunctive multiplicity of eternal objects; the difficulty is to establish in precisely what sense these divine decisions are distinguishable from the choices and calculations made by the Leibnizian deity Whitehead's dilemma seems to be this: on the one hand, the principle of classification is to be challenged by positing the primordiality of a world of eternal objects that knows «no exclusions, expressive in logical terms»; on the other hand, positing pure potentiality as a «boundless and unstructured infinity» (IWM 252) lacking all logical order would seem to be precisely that conceptual move which renders it «inefficacious» or «irrelevant.»

This is by no means Mormons doing baptizing for deceased people and saying: «There, now that you are dead and have no choice we are going to offer a baptism for you and you are now a member of our church whether you like it or not» It's not at all like that!

I understand the argument is straightforward, but it is: 1) based in definitional fiat (there is equally valid evidence to suggest that god is malevolent or simply apathetic); 2) actually embraces the god says so because it is good prong of the dilemma; and 3) attempts to constrain god by limiting god's possible range of choice.

It makes no difference what concepts are used, whether «self - existent,» «necessary being,» «unity,» «final cause,» or what you will to describe the divine individuality; there are always three formally possible cases (though the boundaries between them could be variously located, and they can be subdivided) among which choice must be made openly and carefully, not surreptitiously nor by a short and easy appeal to self - evidence.

Does speaking out take away someone's right to choose, or does it enhance their choice by making them aware that there ARE choices, and giving them a safe space to make that choice?

We live, by choice and vocation, at the intellectual barricades, and we are fully aware of the dangers and temptations attendant there.

While there are still good reasons for believing that man does have some freedom of choice at his highest level of consciousness, it is a freedom within a context of very severe limits, which have been imposed upon him by his creatureliness.

So far as there is conscious determination of actions, the attainment of this conformity is an ultimate premise by reference to which our choice of immediate ends is criticized and swayed.

i believe it was meant for the few chosen and selected by God... there is such a thing as «lone ranger Christians» and not by choice as some like Charles Stanley suggest... it's a lonely existence especially for the single and sick who have no one to turn too.

In this way the ontological argument, by drawing out the presupposition of metaphysical understanding, indicates that the choice before us is between holding that there is a God and that «reality» makes sense in some metaphysical manner, whether or not we can ever grasp what that sense is, and holding that there is no God and that any apparent metaphysical understanding of reality can only be an illusion which does not significantly correspond to the ultimate nature of things — unless this «nihilism» be regarded as a kind of metaphysical understanding instead of its blank negation.

In the same way, if we are, as the abortion - choice movement must assume, bearers of moral rights by nature (including the «right to choose»), then there can be no right to abortion, for the one who has the «right to choose» is identical to her prenatal self.

What God is looking for is repentence and a turning to him rather than a turning away from him.God instituted the animal sacrifices to show just how bad sin was so we would be sorry that we greived him.For us to be made right there has to be a choice to turn from sin and follow him and out of that decision there should be a desire to walk in his ways.Under the old law part of that obedience was to make offerings however it was by faith in God that made the person righteous and not the blood of animals.

As to science, science is given to mankind by God so there is no choice.

If a person claims to be christian I have no choice but to believe them, as there is no way to measure or even prove any influence by a supernatural being.

We can not convert people... we can only teach by example and pray that all non-believers will find Jesus someday and open up their hearts... should they live their lives as if there is no God, it is their choice.

Although many Muslim lands now have indigenous leaders, there are not many examples where those who govern are in power by virtue of popular choice.

In fact, the epiphany that came to me on the day over six years ago when I chose to quit drinking was that all my crying to God to help me quit wasn't going to work — because in that moment I was confronted by the awareness that I had to choose whether to quit or not, that there was no heavenly big daddy waiting in the wings to help me do so, that my choice to not drink would not change the fact that I have come from a family of alcoholics and other addictions that may have a genetic component.