Sentences with phrase «there by denying»

If we want to win the debate for the minds of people who aren't hard set in their views, we don't get there by denying what is, frankly, obvious on first principles: GHGs warm the atmosphere.

So if you truly want to achieve your optimum weight and metabolism, you can't get there by denying yourself and going against biology.

If you truly want to achieve your optimum weight and metabolism, you can't get there by denying yourself and going against biology.

Not exact matches

As a matter of fact, there is no point in denying that by all means clichés surely increase the number of words in the text, which is clearly seen in this sentence.

However, one of the other signers of the declaration, Thomas McKean, denied the July 4th signing date and backed it up by illustrating a glaring flaw in Jefferson's, Adams», and Franklin's argument — namely, that most of the signers were not members of congress on July 4th and thus wouldn't have been there to sign it.

INSIDER's sources deny there's any resulting friction between the two after Shepherd left the company and pointed out that Shepherd was at Kardashian West's intimate dinner party for her 37th birthday on October 27, which was only attended by about 20 close friends and family.

Telus has tried to acquire the small provider on two occasions but was denied both times by the government, meaning there's zero chance the company can sell out for relative big bucks to an incumbent.

During an interview on «Meet The Press» on Sunday, White House chief of staff Reince Priebus denied there was «harm or ill - will or offense intended by any of that.»

The Russian account was denied by the U.S. Central Command, that in an email to The Aviationist explained that there was no truth in the allegation:

First, there is no incentive for Facebook to do any of this; while the company denies this report in Gizmodo that the company shelved a change to the News Feed algorithm that would have eliminated fake news stories because it disproportionately affected right - wing sites, the fact remains that the company is heavily incentivized to be perceived as neutral by all sides; anything else would drive away users, a particularly problematic outcome for a social network.2

is a relatively short level, but that doesn't make it any less impressive: built by Eddie Stilson, the entire stage is a tribute to the original Japanese opening of Dragon Ball Z. Again, it's pretty short, but there's no denying how good Stilson's recreation is, especially considering it was made almost entirely with Mario sound effects:

Well if you're not serving Jesus then you're working for the devil who cares for no one, but there's still time for you to serve the lord and shun the devil, give your life to Christ my friend and receive eternal life don't be blinded by Satan and say that Jesus is not real, he is real and you know he «s real, deep down inside you know he exists, and the bible proves it know matter how you try to deny it.

In any case, there can be no denying that the «renewal» of women's religious life led by the LCWR and its affiliated orders has utterly failed to attract new vocations.

«Nuclear weapons must be banned,» Francis said, quoting a document issued by Pope John XXIII during the Cold War and adding that there is «no denying that the conflagration could be started by some chance and unforeseen circumstance.»

There's no denying that Sheldon's science is distorted a little by status and self - esteem issues, but he wouldn't think of going to HR to get protected from the hurtful (and hilarious) venom of Leslie Winkle.

The proof is in the pudding so to speak, since man was created by God in His image, there is within every person the knowledge of God.Standard equipment.In order to become an atheist you first have to lie yourself past your inner knowledge of God.You have to ignore your life, your spirit, your environment and the whole of creation.That takes a lot of lying to oneself, and you have to buy into a lot more lies to get there.This is not made up, it is a part of the process that ultimately allows the created to deny the creator, God.Deep down every atheist knows they are a liar, but as with any repeated sin the suppressed truth gets farther away, and harder to recognize.God bless

I was so happy when I started reading a book by the current Patriarch of Eastern Orthodoxy and realized that there actually IS a form of Christianity that doesn't deny scientific evidence!

So I decided then and there to stay awake and stay by Jesus side for whatever came next, and that no matter what, I would not deny him.

If there is no a priori ground for denying that, in addition to being influenced by the brain and by intervening experiences, there is also an element of direct recall of past experience, then a much simpler theory, more in accord with introspective evidence, is possible.

While the atheist may be shepherded into heaven by an all - merciful God, there is the chance that that atheist, having denied that God's existence, will be cast into Hell for eternity.

While Tillich provides a system to overcome the subject - object dilemma of Cartesianism, he denies that Being - itself is actually increased or decreased by events, i.e., it is not in process, and, therefore, does not share in human adventures.5 Camus» position implies that if there is a God, such a God would be tolerable only if God is involved in the struggle of man's existence.

Thus, in Islam there is an intimate interrelation between belief and the code of laws governing all conduct, and those who deny this can by no means be considered to be Muslims.

She discusses Lawrence's belief that there is the intrinsically redemptive power of sexual love when it springs from tenderness, and is sustained by the true union of hearts and minds.31 Miss Krook says the church denies what Lawrence is contending for.

due to some crazy religious beliefs out there in the world i.e. marrying off young children and marrying genetic kin, the government can't ever allow religion to dictate marriage policy, so have your ceremonies and deny same - gender couples to marry in your church but bluntly stated your crying and foot - stomping will accomplish nothing, marriage isn't a religious thing it is a civil rights and equality thing, thus if the religious win by denying same gender cuples their civil rights to equal treatment under the law, then don't be surprised when others use those same grounds to deny you your rights under the law.

Rome is wrong to deny ordination to women, but by the same token it was wrong centuries ago about the nature of priesthood; Rome should have rendered a different judgment in the case of contraception, but there is no authentic apostolic authority to make such a judgment in the first place.

The absence of women — as well as of many other things — gives the monks more freedom to devote themselves more fully to prayer, including for those denied entrance to their monasteries and lands (there are women's monasteries, by the way, closed to men for the same reason).

But such would have to be Arkes» outlook: if indeed there are fundamental principles of natural law and natural right, discernible to the human mind generally (as Arkes thinks), then policies or practices that effectively deny these can only be supported for the short term, or in the long term only by continuing fraud and force.

And yet there is no denying that Dominus Iesus of 2000 and «Responses to Some Questions» of 2007, both interpreting Vatican II according to the hermeneutic of continuity, were viewed by many as a cause of ecumenical scandal.

Multiple appeals by ownership to higher courts have been denied, and there seems to be very little legal recourse left for the team and its supporters who seek to keep the name for the sake of NFL tradition.

Can we reconceive theological education in such a way that (1) it clearly pertains to the totality of human life, in the public sphere as well as the private, because it bears on all of our powers; (2) it is adequate to genuine pluralism, both of the «Christian thing» and of the worlds in which the «Christian thing» is lived, by avoiding naiveté about historical and cultural conditioning without lapsing into relativism; (3) it can be the unifying overarching goal of theological education without requiring the tacit assumption that there is a universal structure or essence to education in general, or theological inquiry in particular, which inescapably denies genuine pluralism by claiming to be the universal common denominator to which everything may be reduced as variations on a theme; and (4) it can retrieve the strengths of both the «Athens» and the «Berlin» types of excellent schooling, without unintentionally subordinating one to the other?

God CAN be denied by disbelief because there's no universal mandate to believe in any particular way about any particular deity proposed.

But there is no reason to truncate the interpretive process, as this argument does, by denying or ignoring the valuable object - to - be-interpreted with which it begins.

There never was a time in History that atheists exist, only in this present stage of our intellectual developement that they deny His exisrence, but it can be easily explained that they are just part of the dialectical process of having to have two opposing arguments or forces to arrive to the truth, The opposing forces today are the theists or religious believers of all religions and the other are the atheists who denies religion, The reslultant truth in the future will be Panthrotheism, the belief that we are all one with the whole universe with God, and that we Had all to unite to prepare for human survival that will subject us humans in the future.Aided by the the enlightend consevationist, environmentalists, humanists and all of the concerned activists, we will develop a kind of universal harmony and awareness that we are all guided towards love and concern for all of our specie.The great concern of the whole conscious and caring world to the natural disaster in the Phillipines,, the most theist country now is a positive sign towards this religious direction.Panthrotheism means we will be One with God.

There is a very simple difference — anti-gay people think they can control other people through law by denying them legal rights...pro - gay people understand that religious people have their rights to believe and worship freely, but not to discriminate against others via the law based on religious beliefs.

What is more, there can be no denying the human sense of accountability for what has been done by this «I».

There is not other God, but truth absolute is Lord and GOD of universe, Prove, if you can, stand without balance, if you can hindu Atheists, denier of truth absolute GOD, without truth absolute GOD, constant, no one can exist without, by only in hindu ignorant minds of hindu Atheist, ignorant self centered.

I'm sure that saying this would upset plenty of Twihards as well, but there's a truth to it that can not be denied, just as there is a truth to the idea that God has, and apparently still is, imagined as a «magic man in the sky» by some believers.

The new consciousness is analogous to the new physics which denies there are any such entities as particles uninfluenced in their inner nature by other entities.

It means only that the creation reflects what is the basic character of God in the fullness of deity — the Creator is not denied by what goes on in creation, save when there is willful wrongdoing.

Is it not the case that to stress the issue of fragmentation is to deny that there is any serious issue raised by pluralism, while to stress the issue raised by pluralism is to deny that there is any serious issue about fragmentation?

However, I do not by any means wish to deny that on the part of women there may occur forms of manly despair, and conversely forms of womanly despair on the part of men.

Yes, for all you Muslim lovers out there, for all you Islamists that would die for your religion, for all you weak lillly livered Muslims that flee your own country to live in ours and swear to its destruction, for all you hipocrites that claim to be in a religion of tolerance and peace but live by your actions of murder and unspeakable horrors, you Iranians, you Afghans, you Pakistanis, you Iragis, you misfits and abhorents of any god, this story of a simple Christian, who is now denied his life because of stupid and educaied cowards in Iran, cowards and murderers who covet children and lust hiding behind a demonic religion, let this man be your true martyr because you are not human and can not touch him.

We have seen that Hartshorne has excellent reasons to deny that there is only one form of theism or even that the forms that have been the most prominent are the most coherent; we have also seen why he denies that the existence of God is a hypothesis falsifiable by experience.

Whether Acts was written by Luke (as most still maintain), or by a later anonymous writer, there is no denying the fact that its opening story of the Ascension is inconsistent with the closing chapter of Luke.

The most outrageous claim by these deniers — or «revisionists,» as they style themselves — is that there never was a Holocaust (or Shoah) in which six million Jews were systematically murdered by the Nazis.

«By teaching the equality of all values, by denying that there are things which are intrinsically high and others which are intrinsically low as well as by denying that there is an essential difference between men and brutes, it unwittingly contributes to the victory of the gutter.&raquBy teaching the equality of all values, by denying that there are things which are intrinsically high and others which are intrinsically low as well as by denying that there is an essential difference between men and brutes, it unwittingly contributes to the victory of the gutter.&raquby denying that there are things which are intrinsically high and others which are intrinsically low as well as by denying that there is an essential difference between men and brutes, it unwittingly contributes to the victory of the gutter.&raquby denying that there is an essential difference between men and brutes, it unwittingly contributes to the victory of the gutter.»

But even those who fault Vashti for her stand against her husband and king can't deny the fact that without Queen Vashti, there would never be a Queen Esther, and that ultimately, it would take the defiance of two queens to save the Jews — Esther by appearing before the king, and Vashti, by refusing to.

So, if a group, or a church denies any one of these, by maybe saying that they are the only church going to heaven, or by saying that they hope in good works along with Jesus Christ, or by denying the three members of the Trinity as we saw here, or by denying that there is only one God and Father, then we can safely assume that they are not a true church.

Referring to the criticism made by Peter Beyerhaus and some others that in the World Council's emphasis on social and political justice there is present a social utopianism which denies the fact of sin and affirms a self - redemptive humanism, Thomas admitted that the danger is always present, but pointed out the opposite danger of not admitting the fact of divine grace and the power of righteousness it releases for a daring faith in the realms of social and political action.

Suppose that there were two men: a double - minded man, who believes he has gained faith in a loving Providence, because he had himself experienced having been helped, even though he had hardheartedly sent away a sufferer whom he could have helped; and another man whose life, by devoted love, was an instrument in the hand of Providence, so that he helped many suffering ones, although the help he himself had wished continued to be denied him from year to year.