Sentences with phrase «there hard evidence»

Is there hard evidence there to support your case?

Is there hard evidence there to support your case?

Not exact matches

«There's no hard evidence that there will be a rate increase,» he There's no hard evidence that there will be a rate increase,» he there will be a rate increase,» he says.

Still, Shkilko says there are problems like spoofing that Aequitas's platform can potentially address, even if there's no «hard - core evidence» showing these practices are widespread.

Although, there's never been any hard evidence,» he said.

There is good theoretical reason to think that options wouldhave the same effect as ESOPs, but there is no hard evidenceThere is good theoretical reason to think that options wouldhave the same effect as ESOPs, but there is no hard evidencethere is no hard evidence yet.

There simply is not enough hard data to support claims that Uber has a sweeping impact on drunk driving, but nor is there evidence to the contThere simply is not enough hard data to support claims that Uber has a sweeping impact on drunk driving, but nor is there evidence to the contthere evidence to the contrary.

Though there has never been hard data on the presence of wealthy Asian investors, enough anecdotal evidence exists to suggest they have played at least some role in the multimillion - dollar home segment.

There's no evidence that these sites are complicit in the fakery; it hurts them as much as anyone, but just as with fake news on Facebook and Russian bots on Twitter, it's obviously hard to stop.

I assume that the individuals on both the ETH and ETC sides of the hard fork are good, well - meaning people, and there is ample evidence to support my view.

«He has only been there a year and has been putting his team in place... It's hard to fix a discrete time frame, but over the next 12 months — heading into the 2017 budget — you would like to see some hard evidence that it's working.»

I think the causal link between working hard and being successful is a very flimsy one — there's very little in the way of empirical evidence to back it up, even Buffet himself talks of winning the «ovarian lottery».

God: A magical being believed by some to exist, who knows when you've been bad or good, and will reward you or punish you accordingly, but there's no hard evidence whatsoever that he exists.

Santa Claus: A magical being believed by some to exist, who knows when you've been bad or good, and will reward you or punish you accordingly, but there's no hard evidence whatsoever that he exists.

There's just MORE real, hard evidence for creation.

is it so hard to believe... yes, when there is no evidence at all to support it, and there is an infinite number of other possibilities.

whatever, Atlas exists and if you can't see him, its only because you're not looking hard enough, give me evidence that he's not there... there, now the burden of proof is on you to show me that atlas, zeus, etc..

there is a MOUNTAIN of evidence, hard proof, for evolution - there is ZERO evidence for god.

It's hard when you've been force - fed a series of false fundamentals from which your salvation lies (there is absolutely no evidence for evolution!)

= > there is no evidence that thought for example is hard wired.

That means I do not believe any of the god claims I have heard, because there is never, ever, any hard, verifiable, logical, objective evidence to support them.

I'm not interested in dealing with the other stuff because that's not important — although that is hard to say because there is hardly an iota of evidence of this.3

There can be hard evidence (incontrovertiable forensics) and circumstantial evidence, which is evidence — i.e. admitted to court — but might turn out to be coincidence (forensics involved, but not a direct link between individual and crime) or, if testimonial, untrusted.

Science has explored the creationism claims but it is hard to prove a negative there is no evidence to support it.

A scientist who studies the galaxy will fight hard to prove his theory is correct, but the moment there is evidence to show otherwise, they adjust their original theory.

But there is not the slightest shred of hard evidence that she was Magdalene or that Magdalene was any of the Gospels» other Marys or unnamed «bad» women.

It's hard to imagine people using cell phones in heaven, but there's not much evidence that God will just give us telekinesis to communicate, either.

Topher, Re: «hard questions» here's an easy one you have never been able to answer: «What factual, independent, verifiable and objective evidence is there for any god?»

Our existence can be explained by evolution (of which there is plenty of hard evidence), bad things happen to both good and bad people equally, etc..

For one, there is no archeological or any other type of hard evidence for the Bible's worldwide flood.

However, my example of homicide was that there are intangible, impalpable things as well as hard physical evidence in a homicide case.

The fossil record shows without a shadow of a doubt there were transitions between primitive animals to present animals and the evidence keeps mounting, so there's no faith involved, but cold hard facts.

While it is evident to science that there is a functional «teleonomy» or machine - like purposiveness in individual organisms (for example, the fish's eye is constructed so as to enable it to see under water, the heart toward pumping blood, the human brain toward problem - solving, etc.), still there is no hard evidence that life itself, terrestrial evolution or the universe as a whole has any overarching meaning.

Consider this... a person goes to college, gets a four year degree in archaeology (or some antiquities preservation analog); spends summers sifting through sand and rock and gravel, all the while taking graduate level classes... person eventually obtains the vaunted PhD in archaeology... then works his / her tail off seeking funding for an archeological excavation, with the payoff being more funding, and more opportunities to dig in the dirt... do you think professional archaeologists are looking hard for evidence of the Exodus on a speculative basis... not a chance... they know their PhD buys them nothing more than a job at Tel Aviv Walmart if they don't discover and publish... so they write grants for digs near established sites / communities, and stay employed sifting rock in culturally safe areas... not unless some shepard stumbles upon a rare find in an unexpected place do you get archeological interest and action in remote places... not at all surprising that the pottery and other evidence of the Exodus and other biblical events lie waiting to be discovered... doesn't mean not there... just not found yet...

There is hard evidence for radiometric dating and its accuracy.

There is no hard evidence either way, other than faith.

You said, «I know it's hard for atheists to realize this, but there IS evidence for theism.»

It is hard not to believe that this was primarily an expression of sin rather than sincere faith, but there is strong evidence that many Christians sincerely tortured bodies for the sake of saving souls.

I know it's hard for atheists to realize this, but there IS evidence for theism.

There is exactly ZERO hard and verifiable evidence that any «worship» or «belief in gods» does anything that a comparable believe in some invisible force will not do to the current brain state.

There is a bit of a debate about the role of animal protein in diet, mostly about the studies that only show associations of protein and disease and not hard evidence of causality.

He is organised, hard working — and I often wonder WHAT Wenger exactly does, since there is zero evidence of any real coaching or thought to formations — and Poch has a vision and a clear plan.

Although there was evidence on his social media pages that he was working hard over the summer to get himself back in shape, it appears as though it hasn't been enough to impress Roberto Di Matteo who hasn't selected him at all so far this season.

It's hard for me to take as gospel what I read in sports articles without seeing video evidence, there are some very creative sports journalists.

There's nothing approaching hard evidence that the ball was touching the ground.

And again, there is no hard evidence that a Louisville coach brokered the Bowen deal.

There isn't any hard evidence that Bud's requirements for his personnel are so narrow.

But having said that, there is no hard evidence that it doesn't work.

There is currently no hard evidence suggesting that taking birth control pills during early pregnancy will have any negative effect on a developing fetus.

As hard as it is to wait patiently for baby to come on his or her own, there's plenty of evidence that shows it's best for baby to trigger labor rather than inducing ahead of your due date.