Sentences with phrase «there has an opinion on»

Coconut oil is used for the oil, and they let you choose what kind of flour you want to use, which is important because many diets out there have an opinion on what type of flour is OK to use or not.

Not exact matches

If there are any developments within your industry which you have an opinion on then why not let your Instragram fans know about it and ask start a discussion.

You can still go back and you can look on the Zillow blog and see posts that I wrote, and Stan, who by this point had become our chief economist, wrote about how it was obvious, in our opinion, that housing was going to crash and that it was built on the foundation of sand and there was too much easy credit that had allowed people to buy homes who really couldn't afford them.

There are some risks in per se rules on second opinions, but there may be business risks in not having There are some risks in per se rules on second opinions, but there may be business risks in not having there may be business risks in not having them.

«If the results show that the team has low scores on the item «my opinion counts,» there's likely a problem with communication.

There's also Countable, which lets readers instantly send their opinion to lawmakers, Act On This, which has dubbed itself a «political action cheat sheet,» and Phone2Action, software that connects constituents to lawmakers.

There hasn't been a higher balance of opinion on investment since 2011.

In the weeks since the series debuted, there has been an Internet firestorm that has included countless opinions on whether or not justice was truly served and whether Avery may have suffered the second wrongful conviction of his life (he previously spent 18 years in prison for a sexual assault conviction that was later overturned due to new DNA evidence).

Craig, just given that noise, do you have an opinion on what the handbag market is growing now and then your continued ability to gain share there?

Although there are differing opinions on the subject, it's always best to have a business bank account, regardless of the size of your business.

Justice Kennedy's majority opinion said that there was no principled way to distinguish between media corporations and other corporations and that the dissent's theory would allow Congress to suppress political speech in newspapers, on television news programs, in books and on blogs.

«Because there is no genuine dispute of material fact that Sulyma had actual knowledge of the facts comprising claims I and III, as well as knowledge of the disclosures he alleges were unlawfully inadequate in claims II and IV, the Court grants defendants» motion for summary judgment on those claims, finding them time - barred,» Cousins wrote in his opinion.

LONDON — Two of the biggest investors in Scotland on Wednesday warned of the consequences of a «Yes» vote for independence there amid opinion polls showing next week's referendum has become too close to call.

I have no opinion on whether there is a bubble in gold shares at the moment; having one would require a knowledge of these stocks» fundamental valuations relative to their market prices.

There have been different opinions on this.

How realistic is it in your opinion that they will reach an agreement on limiting production, how important would this be for Russia, and are there any plans or proposals for Russian companies to take similar steps on their side?

While Clinton's views on targeted killings appear to tack closely to those of President Obama, there are those within her national security circle who have voiced more divergent opinions.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

Many people over the years have had opinions about things that later on recanted when faced with contrary viewpoints, perhaps you have just not realized that if there is a God and He commisioned the Bible then whatever He said could not possibly be either ignorant or prejudiced since He would be the ultimate authority...

Read the ferociously anti-slavery Orestes Brownson, who remarked that the issue of secession was not clearly enough resolved by the Constitution of 1787 for us to say that there's no place for seeing a legitimate difference of opinion that would one day have to be resolved on the battlefield.

Those educated «scientists» that the religious dunces seem to hate (due to all those pesky facts they keep spouting), are the people that gave us, the steam engine that started the industrial revolution; they gave us vaccines to cure disease and electricity so we have light where there was once darkness and they invented the jet engine so that the flat Earthers can fly to see their loved ones on those religious holidays that are so important to them... Not to mention they invented computers and the Internet that allows the right wing Bible thumpers to post their uneducated, mindless, factless opinion on this Web Site.

Beatrice explains to Dante the ordering of the hierarchies of angels in the celestial realm, a question on which there had been difference of opinion.

In thinking through Jean - Francois Lyotard's The Postmodern Condition and my position as a «conservative» Catholic sympathetic to our friends on the Porch, I'd like to throw this out there for some opinion.

My point is that millions of poeple have read the bible and there is no clear majority opinion as to what it says on several major points.

There are many additional «color of authority» situations, where the person, under the «color» of their position in the church (be it pastor, elder, staff member, Bible study teacher, the «I've been a Christian for X years» people, the «I've studied the Bible for X years and know what it says» people, or whatever), attempts to impose their opinions and wishes on those over whom they somehow attempt to assume «authority» and control.

If you've ever been persuaded to change your opinion on a «belief» issue as a result of a CNN forum, please click on «Like»... bet there aren't any or many clicks!!

I'm sure people have different perspectives on these verses, but a quick perusal of the various translations show that there is a wide diversity of opinion on how to translate these words of Paul.

It is an instance of elite opinion calling on the United States to act in Syria, without discussing what we would need to do to create and keep peace there.

and you are about to find out if you read on... and then there is opinion about how it has handled.

It is not the judges right or duty to express his personal opinions or beliefs while sitting on the bench, especially while giving a verdict.Judges are there to make sure due process and a fair and impartial hearing or trial takes place for all those involved.this particular judge's rant on the muslim world based on his views from serving in the military had absolutely no bearing on the case and should not have even been brought up much less used to chastise the victim with.

When the Nazi officials on trial at Nuremberg argued in their defense that they had merely obeyed the laws of the state, public opinion quickly agreed that there ought to be a law proscribing such crimes against humanity.

There are multiple ways of explaining and understanding this text, and I will present a few below, but would love for you opinion as well on what 1 Corinthians 9:145 means when Paul says that the Lord commanded that those who preach their gospel should get their living by the gospel.

If majority opinion in the legislature favors some restrictions upon abortion, and there is no specific language in the Constitution on the subject, then «pro-choice» forces have to invoke something very much like a natural law duty to get their way.

Since there's too much chaos and uneducated rhetoric as well as piles a assumptions bordering on lying, I personally can only assume the author truly has no intellectual understanding of the issue or issues surrounding gun control and has resorted to expressing a disconnected opinion without facts.

There are so many wordsmiths out there that can put together such convincing stances that most of you would have to retire and become scholarly and dedicate your entire lives to only be able to state your opinion based on truths you discovered on both sThere are so many wordsmiths out there that can put together such convincing stances that most of you would have to retire and become scholarly and dedicate your entire lives to only be able to state your opinion based on truths you discovered on both sthere that can put together such convincing stances that most of you would have to retire and become scholarly and dedicate your entire lives to only be able to state your opinion based on truths you discovered on both sides.

im going to keep it simple, there was NO rewording of these versus to change the context, it was NOT mistranslated and HAS been time and time again the simpilest verson of opinion on homosexuality that would be AND I QUOTE!

That and we have different opinions on just about everything else except for there not being a magic man in the sky.

Athanasius puts it succinctly in section two of On the Incarnation «In regard to the making of the universe and the creation of all things there have been various opinions, and each person has propounded the theory that suited his own taste.

Writing at a time when many people were paying attention to the travails of «the Clinton couple of Arkansas,» A. M. Rosenthal, on the Op - Ed page of the New York Times that he once edited, thanked the Clintons for the «gift» of presuming «that Americans have achieved adulthood at last» and delivered himself of this opinion: «I know there are voters who do believe that a President should have what they consider a spotless sexual history.

There are so many posts on this subject that I am sure mine will be overlooked or lost in the frenzy, but I have a dog in this fight and I intend to voice my opinion.

Surely there are many other opinion pieces on the Belief Blog that would get you hot and bothered.

while breifly going thru this artical it was makeing my stomach turn, this is just what the devil wants is for doubt and confusion, christianity is growing stronger than ever, souls are being saved and lives are changing every day, and do nt for one minute think any different, or try tp put christians down, why would we loose faith, god answers our prayers everyday, think what you want and do what you do, but do nt try to put things in other people's opinion or minds, jesus died for our sins, so that we can have better lives and be forgiven for our sins here on earth and move on to a beter place, becouse souls do nt die «read the bible, if you do nt understand it, find a church that can help you learn a better way of life, I pray for everyone out there that does nt know jesus christ as ther savior to accept what he has to offer to you «love forgiveness and ever lasting life «Christians» stay strong and [ass the word of god on and share all your tedtimonies in life» god bless everyone»»

There would be variations and opinions, possible disagreements, based on each writers perspective regarding the subject being presented.That isn't true with the Bible!

We do not know for sure the universe has no boundaries, and there are differing opinions on that.

For the same reasons you believe morals are merely opinions, many / most Christians do not have faith in the Spirit, and basically ignore or outright reject the teaching on moral freedom found in Paul's letter to the Galatians (among other places in the NT, but it is most - clearly written out there), though they don't know they are rejecting it and somehow think they are in agreement with it (if they've read the letter at all).

On the other hand, a better vision of «good», in my opinion, would be where there is healthy dialogue and disagreement without people coming to blows and demonizing one another and not resorting to politics to get their way.

There appear to be no studies of children brought up by two male parents, and the few studies purporting to show that children with two lesbian mothers are in no way disadvantaged are typically flawed: they are taken from limited samples, have not followed the children's behaviour through time, and have generally been compiled solely on the lesbian parents» opinions.

Although opinions are divided on the effectiveness of this policy, there has been since the beginning of Intelsat operations a level of cross-subsidization.

I agree with Bill Maher, but then again I'm a lifelong atheist... I have never believed for one minute that the god as portrayed in the bible or koran has any possibility of being real to everyone, otherwise that god would make itself obvious and not hide behind man made lies and cultural practices that self perpetuate thanks fo fear... otherwise there would not be several thousand man made religions trying to claim that god as their own... yes, it is an opinion, only valid to the opinion holder and no one else... Bill, thanks for so strongly making that point, not that it makes any difference to god fearing people... they will hold on to their opinion as strongly as they hold on to their shotgun, thinking that each provides them with some form of security... to intelligent people, neither is secure and neither leads to true freedom of the mind...

Put simply, one has good reason to be respectful of a bishop who condemns a military atrocity; one usually has very little reason to be respectful of that bishop's opinions on the political dynamics of southeast Asia — especially when the bishop is an American who has never been there.