Sentences with phrase «there hole in the ozone»

That there hole in the ozone layer gets blamed for all sorts of mischief.

Not exact matches

We managed to stop putting a hole in the ozone layer by phasing out the chemicals that were causing it (cholofluorocarbons) and, as a result, the hole is closing and there are millions fewer cases of skin cancer than there would otherwise have been.

«There are ways that this approach could increase global ozone but at the same time, because of the climate dynamics in the polar regions, increase the ozone hole.»

Similar clouds in the Antarctic, which cause the ozone hole there, have been observed from American spy planes, but the less stable northern clouds have been studied only with balloons and satellites.

There are ways that this approach could increase global ozone but at the same time, because of the climate dynamics in the polar regions, increase the ozone hole,» Keith said.

Another is almost certainly the infamous ozone hole that opened up over Antarctica in the 1980s, and which is still there.

And yes, there is such evidence — in the predicted response to volcanic forcing, the ozone hole, orbital variations, the sun, paleo - lake outbursts, the response to ENSO etc. that all show models matching the observations skillfully (which is not to say they match perfectly).

Attention, Housekeeping: Clean - up on Aisle Ten; there is a disgusting spill from a mess of self - satisfaction leaking out of an ozone hole in the head.

On top of that there is the influence of the ozone hole, which only comes into play from the 1980s onwards which seems to have influenced the wind patterns and led to consequent cooling in the interior.

There were early bans on CFC aerosol propellants and actions by environmentalists, together with the predictable opposition of vested interests; but the «tipping point» was the discovery by British Antarctic survey scientists of an «ozone hole» over Antartica in October 1984.

There is nothing «natural» about these extremes of weather over the last 2 years, or about the unprecedented ozone hole in the Arctic last year (troposphere warming from greenhouse gases caused stratospheric cooling to below threshold temperature for polar stratospheric cloud generation and ozone destruction).

Don't you know that there's a hole in the ozone layer that's going to give you cancer and burn your face off?!? 1990s Sucker: What?!? Oh my God!

There may be physics that isn't included in the models that might lead to dramatic changes (c.f. the ozone hole physics that were not included in the first models of ozone depletion).

It is striking to what extent they resemble the spatial pattern seen in the AR4 ensemble free - running version rather than the initiallised forecast, though there are also some correlations there too (for instance, west of the Antarctic peninsula, related to the ozone - hole and GHG related increase in the Southern Annular Mode).

The loudest objections and most frequent emails come from the folks who also tend to believe: * The USA did not land on the moon * There was a government conspiracy in the JFK assassination * Fluoride in our water supply is a method of government control * The world is only ~ 5,000 years old * CFC's have no impact on the ozone hole.

Similarly, there was no hole in the Antarctic ozone.

There are no holes in the ozone.

There have been some recent bumper springtime holes in Antarctic ozone.

The Arctic ice pack is thinning, and in many years there is also a seasonal hole in the ozone layer.

I also received a very short note from one of the oldest, most recognized climate alarmists out there, the developer of the Gaia hypothesis and key player in the ozone hole scare.

There are unproven links in the chain of reasoning of a study that claims that more powerful thunderstorms could blast a hole in the ozone layer.

Fourth, there was a point in late 2006 and 2007 when there was some question about whether CFCs were causing the ozone hole.

There are a lot of questions: what is the climate response to solar activity and no solar activity, changes in TSI, spectral variability, particle events, cosmic - ray variability, volcanic aerosols, the Antarctic ozone hole.

We all know there's a «hole» in the ozone layer — a section of the atmosphere over Antarctica where the concentration of ozone is a lot lower than it should be.

Your entire climate overview to the effect that there has been no significant solar effect on the climate is down to your belief in the anthropogenic nature of the growth of the ozone hole which allows you to attribute the observed changes in the temperature of the stratosphere to internal variability (albeit anthropogenic).

A study in Science magazine (Newman, 1994) concluded, «There is no credible evidence for an ozone hole in 1958.»

It's now known that ozone is destroyed in the stratosphere and that some human - released chemicals such as CFC's are speeding up the breakdown of ozone, so that there are «holes» now in our protective shield.