Berg creates an incredibly intense, you - are -
there immediacy through handheld camera movement and precision sound editing.
I saw Western right after Cartel Land, and it was the perfect double feature, following the you - are -
there immediacy of cartel violence with a gentler, more quietly insinuating portrait of same.
Movie review of «Tower»: Using newsreel footage, rotoscoped animation and talking - head interviews, this documentary re-creates the events surrounding the 1966 Texas Tower massacre with a remarkable you - are -
there immediacy.
There's a jittery, you - are -
there immediacy to Kaminski's rough handheld photography and the textured, gritty film stock, and his frequent play with shutter speed gives the explosions the crystal clarity and detail of slow - motion, but at terrifyingly real speed.
Unfolds with such a wallop of you - are -
there immediacy that when the bullets start to fly, your first instinct is to duck.
In the process, he lends a you - are -
there immediacy to an era in which humans invented farming, settled in towns, and created civilization as we know it.
Not exact matches
Although
there are potentially many different definitions of market liquidity, in its simplest form we think of a liquid market as one in which trades can be executed with some
immediacy at low transaction costs.
With VR,
there's an
immediacy and an undeniable visceral component.
For in spite of its prima facie attraction, and even if
there is such a «primal» experience, that experience would not be accessible in any philosophically helpful way, could not be exploited without reliance upon the very analyses and arguments whose lack of
immediacy and authority the appeal is seeking to escape, could not (even for oneself) sustain translation into the discursive and dialectical combat zone of philosophy, and could not by itself alone provide a nonarbitrary basis for determining what in it is essential to experience merely as such.
Whitehead writes that the body as a whole is the organ of sensation: «
There may be some further specialization into a particular organ of sensation, but in any case the «withness of the body» is an ever - present, though elusive, element in our perceptions of presentational
immediacy» (PR 474f).
There is thus some direct reason for attributing dim, slow feelings of causal nexus, although we have no reason for any ascription of the definite percepts in the mode of presentational
immediacy.
In fact, in spite of his insisting that most actual occasions are unconscious (and that
there is much that is unconscious even in that series of actual occasions which constitute our successive mental states), his talk of their experience or feeling of themselves, the influence of their predecessors, and their subjective
immediacy seems pointless unless each of them is supposed to feel its own being, in some genuine sense, however dimly, so that
there is a truth as to what - it - is - like - being - it.
In this way
there is a combination of presentational
immediacy with what Whitehead terms «perception in the mode of causal efficacy,» a direct perception of the causal relation between the sense presentation and the object which it stands for.
Santayana would reject the principle in both forms since he holds, as we have just seen, that
there is no special
immediacy about mind's knowledge of itself: What is ordinarily, and properly, called «knowledge» is, for Santayana, the intuition of an essence combined with an act of intent directed upon some reality beyond which this essence is taken as a description.
One could hardly accept such an identification as fully true to Santayana's intentions, yet
there is a certain intriguing affinity between Whitehead's distinction between perception in the mode of presentational
immediacy and perception in the mode of causal efficacy and Santayana's distinction between intuition and intent.
(The more elaborated form, e.g., the perception of «red
there,» he called «perception according to the mode of presentational
immediacy.»
Subjective
immediacy can not continue, but
there may be a way in which it can be reenacted.
There in the closed room, where one probed and treated the isolated psyche according to the inclination of the self - encapsulated patient, the patient was referred to ever - deeper levels of his inwardness as to his proper world; here outside, in the
immediacy of human standing over against each other, the encapsulation must and can be broken through, and a transformed, healed relationship must and can be opened to the sick person in his relations to otherness — to the world of the other which he can not remove into his soul.
The clear, fully conscious, and definite awareness of this world is a highly selective, abstract, and organized reduction of causal efficacy, giving a sense of an organized world
there, in front of us, a sense Whitehead names presentational
immediacy.
The problem is still raised in its classical form as the persistence of the disembodied soul, but the question really concerns the retention of subjective
immediacy for any occasion, and Whitehead's language suggests that
there may be «a peculiarly intense relationship of mutual immanence» between the occasion and God supportive of its subjective
immediacy.
Whitehead denies this, as he must, if
there is a perpetual perishing of subjective
immediacy.
(a) Hartshorne's objection to my position on truth would be that I assume that
there are truths about the past and that truth is real now as involving a relation of correspondence with an object, the past; however, the past on my view is not real now, is not preserved in its full subjective
immediacy in the consequent nature of God.
There is a similarity to and a difference from Kant's doctrine of space and time as forms of intuition; each occasion inherits this network of potential relatedness from its past, actualizes a portion of it as its own «region,» and (if it has any substantial experience in the mode of presentational
immediacy) redefines the network and projects it upon the contemporary world.
Furthermore, we may point out that Rudolph Bultmann, the distinguished German form - critic, was accustomed to urge that whenever the gospel was faithfully preached
there was also a bringing of the past event of the crucifixion into the
immediacy of the present.
There seemed to be no way of recovering the vital
immediacy of the relation to God, except by a return to the mythical existence of the preaxial state, a return to which Judaism was strictly opposed.
When
immediacy is assumed to have self - reflection, despair is somewhat modified;
there is somewhat more consciousness of the self, and therewith in turn of what despair is, and of the fact that one's condition is despair;
there is some sense in it when such a man talks of being in despair: but the despair is essentially that of weakness, a passive experience; its form is, in despair at not wanting to be oneself.
There must also be a liberation from the
immediacy of the concrete present.
Even in a so - called visual illusion, where, for instance, the space behind the mirror is illustrated in presentational
immediacy,
there is no mistake.
But
there is more to experience than presentational
immediacy.
There is the insistent intimation of an order where both
immediacy and character are retained, where novelty and achieved order are not antagonistic, where life is not merely a transient enjoyment, transiently useful (PR 340/516).
All temporal experience requires the perishing of subjective
immediacy, if
there is to be any objective being.
And this «historicization» was occurring while
there were still living people able to provide the sense of
immediacy that is missing from historical abstraction.
The middle mode of the self, where
there is reference between the symbol (usually via presentational
immediacy) and the meaning (usually via causal efficacy), correlates with the stage of retroflective contact and the phase of intellectual feelings.
It seems quite possible that presentational
immediacy involves both kinds of propositional feelings (perceptive and imaginative).5 Yet
there are differences.
In Cobb's version,
there is an understanding that despite an indication that presentational
immediacy may be equivalent only to one type of perceptive propositional feeling (the direct authentic perceptive feeling), other material suggests that «delusive» perceptions (a variation of direct authentic) are involved as well (PR 122/186).
However,
there are also indications that presentational
immediacy may involve the other major kind of propositional feeling, the imaginative: «Again in the transmuted feeling only part of the original nexus maybe objectified, and the eternal object may have been derived from members of the other part of the original nexus.
In the Jerusalem kerygma
there is an equal sense of
immediacy.
Beginning
there, interpretation will be the endless mediation of this
immediacy.
In testimony
there is an
immediacy of the absolute without which
there would be nothing to interpret.
This produces something of a dilemma: for unless presentational
immediacy and causal efficacy overlap in some way, unless
there is a common ground between them,
there is no assurance that they are giving information about the same entities and the beneficial effects of their complementary relation would be lost.
Thus it follows from the principle which equates
immediacy of experience with certainty of knowledge that
there can be no legitimate perspective on the world by an individual subject from a point of view outside that subject, a point of view which places the subject within a larger — «objective» — context.
The Other is present to us in an astonishing
immediacy and openness so that
there seems to be a commingling of beings in bonds of affection....
Some thirty years ago Charles Hartshorne raised two questions concerning the Whiteheadian understanding of the temporal structure of God.1 He asked first if, in spite of relativity physics,
there must not be a cosmic present, a divine
immediacy in which the de facto totality of simultaneous actual entities exist.
It enables them to live that life in full
immediacy moment by moment being fully present to whatever or whoever is
there.
There is thus some direct reason for attributing dim, slow feelings of causal nexus, although we have no reason for any ascription of the definite percepts in the mode of presentational
immediacy (PR 268).
Perception in the mode of presentational
immediacy locates it in clear consciousness
there - now in the place where the tooth's aching occurred a fraction of a second ago.
In this procedure
there is the same decentering, even «dispossession,» of reflective
immediacy we have previously observed: a demand that we must make a «detour» through the symbolic world.
At the end of the day
there are no cosmic truths, and so we default to the
immediacy of desire, unless practical or utilitarian concerns limit us.
Is
there any sense in which such
immediacy does not fade?
Above all, it is possible to exhaust what the gospel has to say by talking about and working for the
immediacies, assuming that
there is in that gospel nothing more than an imperative for better relations among men, classes, races, and nations, with the building in the not too distant future of a society in which opportunity of fulfillment will be guaranteed to everybody.