Sentences with phrase «there need for law»

Nor is there need for law and force, for everything will give way to the service of love.

Not exact matches

I think there needs to be an overarching review of laws for startups - a separate one which can incorporate: 1.

If you remove the need to income split by taxing the family unit of those in married or living common - law relationships and then adopt a flat tax for everyone — say 20 % — there really is no need for small business to incorporate, except for perhaps liability issues.

If you want to gain entry to any industry there are certain obvious things you need to learn — a body of knowledge about technology or law, for example, formal procedures, the identity of the sector's key players, etc..

There may be workarounds for U.S. small businesses feeling the pinch, but they'll need to act fast, says John Scannapieco, a co-leader at the international law firm Baker Donelson.

the problem is that ppl read the bible thats been translated, if you realy want to know what was said youll need to study hebrew... every letter has a meaning... every word isnt a perfect fit for english,, theres nuances and cultural differences that youll find,,, its a whole new thing to go back and look at the bible through hebrew eyes,,, they arent required to look like us,,, were supposed to look more like them,,, yashua was a jew,,,, all the apostles were jews, yashua was sent to the lost sheep of the house of israel, not the gentiles, paul took it to the gentiles, and he never stopped being and living as a jew, the laws are very viable today, but they do nt give salvation, thats what yashua did...

Let me get this straight, if a law is broken then there is no need for that law?

And just as there are certainties we have learned from nature, such as the laws of science, gravity, and thermodynamics, there are also certainties we can learn from Scripture, such as the holiness of God, our own sinfulness, and our need to believe in Jesus for eternal life.

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.

The pope didn't actually mention the world - famous scientist, who argues in a book published last month that the laws of physics show there is no need for a supreme... \

Perhaps Professor Ayala is postulating the idea of God as something like a watchmaker who creates the initial laws in such a way that there is no need for His later intervention.

If there is any law passed it should be that the Burqa must be removed upon request for identification purposes by anyone that needs to see ID for financial transactions or police work etc..

I think under the law there was provision for high - handed or willful sin, but now there is no longer a need for that provision.

The Fiqh Council Fatwa needs improvement because it says that only where Muslims live as minorities do they have to respect laws so long as there is no conflict for obedience to God.

The pope didn't actually mention the world - famous scientist, who argues in a book published last month that the laws of physics show there is no need for a supreme being to have brought the world into existence.

Since I am tired of explaining to my wife that, contrary to Arkes and Hittinger, I am not a moral skeptic, I am grateful to Mr. Ball for understanding that I have merely been urging moral modesty on judges: «I hope there is no need to stress that Bork rejects neither God nor God's laws; he simply doesn't want earthly judges barging into God's act!»

Nor, whatever allowance be made for overcoloring in the course of controversy, is it possible to doubt that he did deliberately criticize them, and sometimes in trenchant terms, though we need not assume that all of them were included in such criticism; there were perhaps more teachers of the Law with whom Jesus could find himself in friendly agreement than the two or three who have found their way into the gospels.

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

For the most part, in this country, Muslims aren't the ones attempting to legislate what they believe into law, therefore there is no need for the Atheist to be vocally opposed to that lack of actiFor the most part, in this country, Muslims aren't the ones attempting to legislate what they believe into law, therefore there is no need for the Atheist to be vocally opposed to that lack of actifor the Atheist to be vocally opposed to that lack of action.

If the Bible needs to be interpreted for modern times that just proves it's nothing more than an ordinary book written by ordinary ancient people, and there's no more reason to base our laws or our lives off it than the Iliad or Beowulf.

No lesser a Christian than Martin Luther understood our predicament: Anyone, he wrote in ìOn Temporal Authority, î who tried ìto rule the world by the gospel and to abolish all temporal law and the sword on the plea that all are baptized and Christian, and that, according to the gospel, there shall be among them no law or sword» or the need for either»... would be loosing the ropes and chains of the savage wild beasts and letting them bite and mangle everyone, meanwhile insisting that they were harmless, tame, and gentle creatures; but I would have the proof in my wounds.î I do not believe that Hauerwas sees America's enemies as harmless, tame, and gentle creatures.

There would still be need for work to meet human needs, but God has provided forms of law and government that man's life may be ordered, sin restrained, and the necessities of communal existence met.

Luther can boldly say that if all men were truly Christians there would be no need for «secular sword or law».

Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?

One quote that seems to help me all the time is this: «there is absolutely no need to hurry about anything: everything must happen only at the precise time appointed by the Cosmic Law»:) Best wishes for you on this new year

There is now talk that Mesut Ozil may well be persuaded to sign a new contract, and with changes at the club there could be reason for optimism, but unfortunately I believe that the problems stem from way above Law, and that Kroenke is the only person who can give us the changes neThere is now talk that Mesut Ozil may well be persuaded to sign a new contract, and with changes at the club there could be reason for optimism, but unfortunately I believe that the problems stem from way above Law, and that Kroenke is the only person who can give us the changes nethere could be reason for optimism, but unfortunately I believe that the problems stem from way above Law, and that Kroenke is the only person who can give us the changes needed.

It's all good and well saying we want kroenke / gazidis / law / wenger out, but the truth is that while this club makes money there's no chance of that happening, then we'd need to find a buyer who cares for the club enough to do right by all.

This change in insurance law has made it possible for more parents to get the care they need, however, there are some bumps in the road and coverage is not always available.

As to LTFA and school lunches, I'd like to say that there really needs to be better education for the schools / nutrition services & personnel as to what is REALLY in the foods, what has / hasn't been disclosed by manufacturers (true grasp of the food labelling laws as currently written), and how to fully and accurately provide all students / parents / consumers with timely and accurate ingredient lists so that fully - informed and educated decisions can be made as to when / if student might eat the cafeteria (bfast or lunch) foods.

There's nothing in the law that says that the materials used in these kind of products need to be listed for the consumer, therefore you can never know for sure what your sanitary pads are really made of and what they might do for your body and health.

For breastfeeding practices to improve, there needs to be support at every level: supportive frameworks should exist within public policy, law, the health - care system, communities, families and friends.

I agree with this as there do need to be boundaries for both mothers and in laws.

There are laws and standards which will help you decide which car seat is needed for your child's age.

«Reclaiming Childhood: Freedom and Play in an Age of Fear is not only an important book, it is groundbreaking... This entire straight - talking book is worthwhile and a must read for anyone concerned with child development and social policy... We should be grateful that there are still psychologists around like Helene Guldberg who have not confused political laws with the laws of nature and can inform us what kids truly need for healthy psychological development.

When mothers return to work and need to continue pumping to provide milk for their baby, there are laws that protect their rights to do so.

The reason for this is that there are many more liberal parties in the UK Parliament than Conservative, and chances are that during motions that have to carry in parliament that need a majority conservatives will have a hard time passing laws if the Liberal Democrats, Green Party, SNP and Labour all vote against the Tories» motions.

There is no quick technical fix that will protect victims — it needs education, responsible parenting and more resources for enforcing the laws that already exist.»

There are many hurdles that would need to be overcome for this argument to fit into the structure of international law.

Nor is there much of a case for special pleading, either in Ms Follett's case that her security needs were somehow terribly special or in Mr Law's case that his (perfectly reasonable) wish for a private life should be subsidised (unwittingly) by the taxpayer.

13) Do you believe that there is a need for new laws to protect workers rights, or trades union rights?

It's ridiculous public policy, it's bad public policy, it circumvents the law, it basically says there's no need for a legislature whatsoever, it's unilateral dictates by an executive, and I think it's just absolutely horrible.»

«While the OTS is welcome, there is also a pressing need for improvements in the parliamentary process for scrutinising new and existing tax laws.

Ashade said: «There was an urgent need for the repeal, as the old law had not been reviewed for over 15 years, since 2001.

«Activities of the government must be complemented by the people and they equally need to know that there is punishment for environmental laws violation.»

«There's not this large hole that's going to be filled by finding some not - for - profit that's not paying,» McDonald said, noting the state needs to review Real Property Tax Law and New York state has its own tax exempt status.

«Where there is a need for new laws, we will pass them, where there is a need for tougher enforcement we will make sure that that happens.»

He added: «We've got to bring the law into line with reality, and for people who are launching businesses they need clarity and there are now enormous numbers of businesses springing up and operating in this new digital world and they need to understand the way in which copyright law operates.

Then there is the regulatory issue, where he needs to create authorities capable of handling the deluge of new powers about to be regained for Britain, for instance on fisheries or pharmaceuticals, and give them legal recognition in law.

However, to be meaningful this must be backed up by changes in planning law that stops owners demolishing and converting pubs without even the need to apply for planning permission, otherwise, in many cases there would be no pub left for the community to bid for!

The Democrats believe that laws should be created in order to help those who can not help themselves that as we live in a civilized society, that there are those that need protection because they are unable to «fend» for themselves.