Sentences with phrase «there other arguments»

I'm saying that, without religious objections to gay marriage, is there any other argument that would be posed against it?

Not exact matches

First, there were 125 men in one large room... The men were very considerate of each other, and I didn't hear a raised voice ever, much less an argument.

However, one of the other signers of the declaration, Thomas McKean, denied the July 4th signing date and backed it up by illustrating a glaring flaw in Jefferson's, Adams», and Franklin's argument — namely, that most of the signers were not members of congress on July 4th and thus wouldn't have been there to sign it.

On December 28, 25 - year - old Tyler Barriss called police in Wichita, Kansas, falsely claiming he'd shot his father during an argument and was holding two other people hostage in a home there.

There are the arguments for status quo equality with other utilities, and then there is the case for progThere are the arguments for status quo equality with other utilities, and then there is the case for progthere is the case for progress.

In other words, people for whom there is at least some social argument that working less is a good thing.

DUBNER: So, to summarize your overall argument about our rise and fall of American growth: would it be an overstatement to say that there was a lot of low - hanging fruit — physical and labor, and all other kinds of fruit that we picked beautifully and ate hungrily, and we did really well with — and that those things, once used up, that kind of gain will never appear again as far as you can see?

For a while now our focus has been on relative value and there is very little argument that, after the first quarter price collapse, a whole lot of risk has been taken out of bitcoin, ether, Ripple and thousands of others.

For example, some time back HFT was blamed for higher volatility in the cattle market, even though such trading represents a smaller fraction of cattle trading than it does for other contracts, and especially since there is precious little in the way of a theoretical argument that would support such a connection.

The argument from Gavin and other who supported increasing the transaction capacity by this method are essentially there are economies of scale in mining and that these economies have far bigger centralisation pressures than increased resource cost for a larger number of transactions (up to the new limit proposed).

Ezra Klein: There is a quality of being able to say no and being able to shop around and being able to do things on your timetable that really matters here, but the other thing that I think is interesting there, because here's where I think possibly liberals can take this argument tooThere is a quality of being able to say no and being able to shop around and being able to do things on your timetable that really matters here, but the other thing that I think is interesting there, because here's where I think possibly liberals can take this argument toothere, because here's where I think possibly liberals can take this argument too far.

There is a strong legal argument for why some of the tokens that have come after BTC are not securities, but many other tokens that have popped up over the past 18 months look more like a security as defined by the Howey Test.

On one hand, Norway's past eight years, in which it had both a trade account surplus and a governmental fiscal surplus would seem to support his argument; yet there are too many other examples which do not confirm this theory.

There's rarely enough nuance or context provided in these arguments because both sides of the aisle seem to portray the other side as being the enemy in the passive versus active debate.

There's no question that investors have become nearly frantic in their verbal arguments about the permanence of elevated profit margins (which is something that Benjamin Graham observed at other market peaks, and warned against decades ago).

To be sure there were other arguments for independence as well.

GFI believes that there is a strong argument for charities to focus on areas other than technological development, particularly when for - profit companies seem likely to develop a technology on their own.

Once you are there the arguments about comparison with other sins, ones Christians are more comfortable and therefore tolerate if not enjoy, is inevitable.

As to same - sex marriage stabilizing homosexual practices, this is of course the argument of Andrew Sullivan and some other gay activists, although there is little or no evidence to support it.

On the other hand, an intelligent deity should accept the «I don't follow any of them since there was no proof» argument.

There is one other argument common among church people.

There simply can not be «scientific» evidence or argument that tells one way or the other in regard to God.»

I realize Jimmy that there is a huge argument whether or not revelation is other than who he is.

There is no argument that the mediation is Christ Jesus's mediation — but he has given it to others to share.

And then there was his argument with the other believers who were «of the Pharisees» that ended up in the council of Jerusalem.

I have wondered about all of the arguments about the Church doing our thinking when there is no Church requirement to carry a card identifying yourself as a Catholic, no requirement to give money or do anything other than love God and travel as well as you can on your journey to heaven.

You tried to claim otherwise the other day, but you never actually had any argument, every point you tried to make was shot down because there was no logic or reason behind it, so you failed.

There is no principled legal or theological argument that looks only to the good of Christians over the interests of others.

While conceivability arguments are popular with those wishing to defend the honour of the soul, there are other more credible arguments for the immateriality of the intellect: less fun for sure, but more robust.

One argument which has been attempted against its historicity has been that there are ancient accounts of floods to be found among other peoples; however, rather than discounting the reality of the Flood I view this as corroborative.

To put it — for the sake of argument — a bit too simply: there have been behind the civil religion from the beginning two great structures of interpretation, the one I shall call biblical, the other utilitarian.

As you see there is a christian c - o - c - k - s - u-c-k-e-r who likes to use other people's handle when they can't win arguments.

Certainly, there are many things I appreciate about John Calvin, Jacobus Arminius, Martin Luther, and the other Reformers, but I have too many differences with the main theological arguments of each man to be comfortable identifying myself with the theological systems that bear their names.

Right there you lost the argument because you are not open to the other side of the debate, it's your way or the highway..

At least there is an argument on each side for other controversial issues.

One could look at the opposite of this argument and say that without God there could be no murder, or any other socially unacceptable behavior.

Faced with conflicting interpretations based on religious premises, national leaders can readily turn to other arguments on which there is greater consensus.

There never was a time in History that atheists exist, only in this present stage of our intellectual developement that they deny His exisrence, but it can be easily explained that they are just part of the dialectical process of having to have two opposing arguments or forces to arrive to the truth, The opposing forces today are the theists or religious believers of all religions and the other are the atheists who denies religion, The reslultant truth in the future will be Panthrotheism, the belief that we are all one with the whole universe with God, and that we Had all to unite to prepare for human survival that will subject us humans in the future.Aided by the the enlightend consevationist, environmentalists, humanists and all of the concerned activists, we will develop a kind of universal harmony and awareness that we are all guided towards love and concern for all of our specie.The great concern of the whole conscious and caring world to the natural disaster in the Phillipines,, the most theist country now is a positive sign towards this religious direction.Panthrotheism means we will be One with God.

There is, to be sure, Hartshorne's often repeated argument that since the simultaneous actualization of all possibilities is logically impossible (since some logically exclude others), the notion of a unique maximum of perfection makes no sense.31 But this argument construes perfection in a crude, quantitative way that is, to say the least, not inevitable.

By your argument, if there was 1 religious person that was skeptical and all others not, my point would still be invalid, talk about bs.

They were oral traditions for centuries and not until it was put on paper did folks begin using one verse here and one verse there to create arguments that marginalize others that do not look and think just as the majority in power do.

My argument was that Pure Land Buddhism identified its founder with a mythical figure, Dharmakara, that there are advantages in connecting one's tradition to historical reality, that the emphasis on other power or grace is clearer in the Christian tradition than in most Buddhism, and that Jesus could function as an historical embodiment and teacher of grace.

Though it is not quite true that Gustafson and other liberals «never enter into argument against Barth,» there is a pronounced tendency in liberal theology to dismiss Barth's idea of truth as the self - authenticating word of God.

There is at least one: since being is power, every being has some power just by virtue of being; but then it is metaphysically impossible that God should have all the power.20 Or to make this an internal argument against the classical doctrine, the conclusion could be softened to read: «If there is anything other than God, God does not have all the power there is.&rThere is at least one: since being is power, every being has some power just by virtue of being; but then it is metaphysically impossible that God should have all the power.20 Or to make this an internal argument against the classical doctrine, the conclusion could be softened to read: «If there is anything other than God, God does not have all the power there is.&rthere is anything other than God, God does not have all the power there is.&rthere is.»

Some of the other arguments are flawed as well such as there must have been something with the desire to create or nothing would have been created.

There should be no argument or concern when it comes to others demonstrating faith in some for of religious practice.

There is little argument to support the legitimacy of that practice, other than a mention of some cases whose outcome Ball approves on moral grounds.

I could see some of their arguments if there were mentions of Jesus, Mohammad, Buddha, or any other religious figure which endorses one religion over another but there is not.

There are other elements in Lindskoog's web of arguments, some more persuasive than others, some eccentric.

Dearborn, plenty of atheist sites to find out there and many of them would love you to visit but you better have a good argument why your religion is real and all the others are make believe.