Sentences with phrase «there robust evidence»

Not exact matches

«There is robust evidence that social isolation and loneliness significantly increase risk for premature mortality, and the magnitude of the risk exceeds that of many leading health indicators,» Holt - Lunstad said in a statement about the research.

To pick up a few points: the historical evidence for small and value factors is robust but there's no guarantee they'll work in the future.

That's not very robust evidence, and there's nothing physical to link that to your god.

If there is trauma involved, families should find great comfort in the robust evidence that in time and with evidence based support, mothers and infants can, and do, heal and go on to thrive in their relationships.

The Home Office's own report from 2011 found there was «a general lack of robust evidence on the link between khat use and social harms».

At the tail end of our time in Government Harriet Harman as Equalities Minister commissioned an in - depth study on inequality by Prof John Hills and there was huge discomfort from No 10 about even doing that, but we wanted robust evidence to help us shape the Equality Act.

For example, while we do in fact have a robust process in place to annually monitor and evaluate projects, as evidenced by our strong jobs performance in the audit, we recognize there may be additional tools available that could help us verify the information we receive.

Once this evidence had been synthesized, it became much clearer that there were robust correlations between the temperature and sunspots.

There is, in fact, no evidence that the city was ever invaded, and no indication of bellicose tendencies other than the robust stockade surrounding the city center.

Yet, until now, the UK's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has said there is insufficient evidence to recommend behavioural activation as a first - line treatment in clinical guidelines, and has called for more robust research to investigate the benefits.

«The inference [from robust star formation] is that there must be a lot of material, but there's been sort of step there that's missing — the evidence of that material is what we've now been able to show.»

While there are many precise mechanisms of ADRCs that continue to be investigated, there is robust scientific evidence that they have the capacity to address inflammation, stimulate new blood vessel formation, prevent premature cell death and secrete substances that encourage repair and regeneration.

While future studies will reveal whether transplantation of hGDAsBMP to DLF injuries provide protection of red nucleus neurons, hGDAsBMP provided robust neuron protection in multiple spinal cord laminae, even in more distant gray matter in which there was no evidence of hGDAsBMP migration.

Therefore, there is, as yet, no robust evidence for realized severe disruptions of marine socioecological links from ocean acidification to anthropogenic CO2, and there are significant uncertainties regarding the level of pH change that would prompt such impacts.

On the other hand, there is mounting evidence for a distinctive role played by motor vehicle traffic — related exposures in elevating cardiovascular risk.108, 111,268,269 Lipfert et al76, 77 interpreted the results of their analysis of the Veterans Affairs hypertensive male cohort as suggesting that traffic density was a more «significant and robust predictor of survival in this cohort» than PM2.5.

While there is not much robust and methodologically sound research on magnesium's antispasmodic properties, there exists evidence that supplementation relieves cramps in some patient populations, like pregnant women (of course, if you're pregnant and considering a change in your supplement regimen, talk to your doctor first).

«despite this and the evidence from numerous in vitro and in vivo models that honey kills problematic wound pathogens, there is a paucity of robust clinical data for manuka honey.

There is scant robust evidence of what actually works whether it is how to observe colleagues, to provide meaningful feedback or to help change the practice of fellow teachers for the better.

The NEU also states that more robust evidence is required for another reform of the skills system and the review of level 3 qualifications proposed and that unless T - level implementation is properly planned, resourced and funded, there is a risk that their standards will be watered down to make existing level 2 qualifications «fit».

Conclusions In summary, to have an informed populace and clarity on how best to educate our children and ourselves, there must be a robust foundation of high - quality data, rigorous, objective research and strong communication of evidence on what works and what does not.

-LSB-...] Current research suggests that getting feedback right, establishing productive teacher - student relationships, reciprocal teaching and fostering meta - cognitive strategies to help students become better at learning are among the strategies for which there is a robust evidence base for improved outcomes.

And although there is a robust positive correlation between test performance and college enrollment, there is little existing evidence as to whether schools that increase test scores the most also help their students succeed at the next level.

With New Orleans and Washington, D.C., serving as the nation's largest case studies, and other international examples as well, there is now a robust enough evidence base to inform a far more sophisticated discussion about choice.

There is robust evidence that the EITC has quite large effects on children's academic achievement and attainment, with potentially important consequences for later - life outcomes.

A spokesman for the Joint Council for Qualifications, representing exam boards, said there were «robust procedures in place to ensure only those candidates who are eligible for access arrangements receive them» and schools were inspected to ensure applications for extra time were «supported by the required evidence».

There are some indications that computer - based tutoring approaches can be successful in improving reading comprehension (although the evidence is less robust in this area), particularly when they focus on the development of strategies and self - questioning skills.

As noted previously in The Conversation by Glenn Savage (here and here), there is a lack of rigorous and robust evidence that school autonomy leads to better student outcomes.

«The association between parental engagement and a child's academic success is well established... parental engagement is consistently associated with pupils» success at school... [but] there is surprisingly little robust evidence about the impact of approaches designed to improve learning through increased parental engagement.»

In support of his view, Professor Alice Sullivan of the UCL Institute of Education said: «There is no robust evidence that any particular school structure or type --- such as academies, free schools, faith schools — is beneficial for improving the performance of poor pupils.»

There is robust evidence that chronic absence puts children at risk of school failure.

There's no robust evidence that this Charter system improves schools by removing them from public oversight and handing them over to private business operations.

That there are thousands of potential sites, the potential for robust evidence is overwhelming.

Again, my apologies, though I am curious as to why the idea of CO isotope or calcium leaching was not considered in the prior research, are there too many degrees of freedom to establish a robust evidence base or is there no reliable means to track calcium errosion or the acidic signature responsible?

But the conclusions are robust because there is lots more evidence» and the research grants are still flowing for lots more evidence again.

Pekka — are there lines of evidence that are robust with respect to the self - inflicted gaps in the reconstruction you are suggesting should be made?

There are are some parts for which the evidence is so robust and so strong that it would be silly to dismiss it.

... In light of their recent findings, Davies et al. say there is «little support for the existence of a «permanent El Niño»... that there was robust ENSO variability in past «greenhouse» episodes and that future warming will be unlikely to promote a permanent El Niño state,» which point they also emphasize in the final sentence of their abstract, where they say that their evidence for robust Late Cretaceous ENSO variability «does not support the theory of a «permanent El Niño,»» [Andrew Davies, Alan E.S. Kemp, Graham P. Weedon, John A. Barron 2012: Geology]

There is absolutely no evidence for a very low sensitivity inherent within the Earth system, and there are only a few authors currently publishing, such as Lindzen or Spencer, that are still arguing the point... generally based on very questionable methodology and assumptions that do not stand up as being robust to a wide line of evidThere is absolutely no evidence for a very low sensitivity inherent within the Earth system, and there are only a few authors currently publishing, such as Lindzen or Spencer, that are still arguing the point... generally based on very questionable methodology and assumptions that do not stand up as being robust to a wide line of evidthere are only a few authors currently publishing, such as Lindzen or Spencer, that are still arguing the point... generally based on very questionable methodology and assumptions that do not stand up as being robust to a wide line of evidence.

«Section 9.4.1.3.2, p. 9 - 26, lines 31 - 33: «In Summary, there is a high confidence (robust evidence although only medium agreement) that most, though not all, CMIP3 and CMIP5 models overestimate the warming trend in the tropical troposphere during the satellite period 197902011.

In summary, there is high confidence (robust evidence although only medium agreement) that most, though not all, CMIP3 and CMIP5 models overestimate the warming trend in the tropical troposphere during the satellite period 1979 — 2011.

As the Guardian has reported, the Australian government's own environment departmental website says there's a «growing and robust body of evidence» showing the number of extreme weather events will likely increase under climate change, and that Australia is already experiencing a rise in the number of these events, including bushfires.

«There is a wealth of experts in their fields producing evidence, year after year, on the extreme negative consequences of dam construction; I am yet to see any robust evidence that the benefits of dams can outweigh these consequences,» she concluded.

(i) observed changes are already occurring and there is evidence for anthropogenic contributions to these changes, (ii) the phenomen [a][are] based upon physical principles thought to be well understood, and (iii) projections are available and are broadly robust across models.»

Regardless of this, it is clear that there is no robust evidence of a widespread link between the cosmic ray flux and clouds.

Along with the fact that, as AR5 correctly states, there is no robust evidence whatsoever for a sun / GCR / cloud climate effect.

There is robust evidence that the downward trend in Arctic summer sea ice extent is better simulated than at the time of the AR4, with about one quarter of the simulations showing a trend as strong as, or stronger, than in observations over the satellite era (since 1979).

«I believe there is some evidence (but not enough to form a robust conclusion) that tornadoes were worse in the first half of the 20th century.»

A climatechange.gov.au document on the indicators of climate change states there is a «growing and robust body of evidence that climate change will increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events».

I don't think there is any robust observational evidence of a strong positive cloud feedack, either, yet all the models cited by IPCC assumed a strong positive feedback despite this.

There is a robust body of evidence to show that divorces that follow this path can have a negative impact on the wellbeing of any children involved.