Sentences with phrase «there something less»

Is there something less appealing about teaching or sort of a combination of both?

Are they based on reality, or is there something less going on enti Play dating sims for guys!

Are they based on reality, or is there something less going on enti

Are they based on reality, or is there something less going on enti Are you an existing user?

Not exact matches

«When I came out of the field I'd feel good, and I realized then that there's probably something to this idea of eating less.»

If you really suck at doing something, chances are there is someone out there that can probably do it for less than $ 5 / hr.

There are already people doing that perfectly, so we thought we would do something a little less conflict based.

I have a lot of photos stored there that I'm too lazy to move, and I want people looking for me to be able to find me easily, and every now and then I have something to share with a lot of people, whether it's a magazine article or a baby photo (although the decline of organic reach has made that kind of sharing less rewarding).

«Some people just decided, we'll make gun X pink, violet or something, and I'm sure there were some people who bought them, but there was less thought into them,» Tartaro says.

Sometimes there may be an opportunity for a business to offer something that's smaller or lower in quality for a lesser price than the industry standard.

While there are probably a few things Millennials themselves can do to beat back perfectionism (for the love of all that is holy, spend less time on social media, for instance), the underlying causes of this shift suggested by the study, including an increasingly terrifying scramble for a shrinking number of slots in the middle class, are something we're all going to have to address together.

In other words, there's much less embarrassment about asking to be paid for services provided, and there's more openness to those who can bring something new to the table.

Well, research shows that on average, people tend to talk about themselves during 60 percent of a conversation — and when there's something being sold by one person in the conversation, a less experienced salesperson could be tempted to fill a void of silence with a laundry list of more selling points and value propositions.

If my goal was to make a cup of coffee or something, there's a whole bunch of actions I might want to take, and the reward signal is a little less clear.

Whether it's something we can't change (our ethnicity, for instance), or something we can (the way we dress) there's always a way to look a little bit less like a tourist and to blend in with the locals.

Watching the New England Patriots — trailing 21 - zip in the second quarter, down 25 points in the third, 19 points in the hole with less than 600 seconds to go in regulation — rally to win the Super Bowl in overtime, I couldn't help but wonder if there was some mysterious science behind «the miraculous comeback»: something measurable, or at least point - to - able, that captures the transformation of human spirit that drives an individual — or, more inexplicably, a team of separate beings — to see «victory» when «loss» is flashing all around them.

Virgin Atlantic's wording for its mid-level seating is quite clever: by calling it premium economy rather than business class or something similar, it makes it seem less of a step up even though there is quite a large price difference.

A vast increase in oil transport by rail surely has at least something to do with the accident — if the train hadn't been carrying oil, its destruction might have been less catastrophic — but there will inevitably be debate over the conclusion to draw from that observation.

Maybe this means there is an increase in domestic adoptions in each respective country, or less abandonments, or something else positive.

And there are lots of good properties here to the point where you will pay $ 50000 or less for something like this.

That means there is less chance of a downgrade in the coming years, something the agency credited to improvements in public finances and the pickup in growth.

The biggest problem with making public predictions - of which there are plenty to choose from - is that the more times you say something the less likely you are to change your mind.

There were two main camps at the time: that represented by Jovinian, claiming that virgins, widows, and married women were all deserving of equal merit, and that represented by Jerome, which said that marriage was merely the lesser of two evils, rather than something positive in its own right.

The danger of gourmet vegetarianism is there, but often enough one will eat something less palatable than the plate one's eyes and stomach demand.

If there is indeed a soul or purpose for man that is greater than self (animal) evolution would point towards something greater not something less than or limited to the purpose of an ape or a plant.

There was no individual right to bear arms, and that this is something that was actually more or less introduced to us by the NRA, but I'm anxious to know what you think [about the suggestion that he gave about repealing the Second Amendment].

I find it much less disturbing that Megyn Kelly should make a point of observing that the character of Santa Claus is traditionally white than the suggestion by Aisha Harris that there is something intrinsically wrong with a white Santa Claus.

There are a lot of folk who consider this life as the real deal and don't want it dirtied up with others in your face trying to make you enjoy it less in preparation for something else.

It is not an exaggeration to say there is no way the writer would say something like, «Such - and - such college has the dubious distinction of being the MOST religious campus etc. etc.» The author is fueling the notion that somehow being less religious is somehow a bad thing when each day and throughout history it has been shown time and again being more religious is more of a liability.

There is not something you can do (or fail to do) which will make Him love you any more or any less.

Mainly, because in all the verbiage about freedoms of beliefs there is something so important, so blatantly acute yet everyone do not even mention it, except - oh genial me: Why would anyone in the whole world support any type of creed / belief / religion where a whole lot of humans — as in millions of human women — are not allowed to go to school, to even just read and write - less become a teacher, doctor, lawyer, president of their own companies, their own countries, mutilated by the millions when they reach puberty, WHY is this allowed?

Though you may not yet know it, there are thousands upon thousands of your brethren who have exited the church building in pursuit of something that we see as more authentic, less man - centered, and closer to the heart of Christ.

But as time or quality material are less crucial for Twitter, you can find him there (@kruegertw) tweeting maps, puns, and occasionally something of consequence, like gender, faith, and culture.

Many readers will be familiar with some of the traditional «arguments for the existence of God», such as that everything has a prior cause, but that the causal chain can not be continued back indefinitely, so that there must somewhere be a First Cause; or that since there are various degrees of perfection there must be a Perfect One by whom all lesser degrees are measured; or that all change in a thing is caused by something else which leads eventually to some Prime Mover.

«17 Now one may find something less than the pure spirit of love here but there is also disclosed a valuable element in human nature which a Christian ethic ought to respect and enlist, not relegate to a place wholly outside the Kingdom.

There is some difference of opinion among scholars as to whether stories found in rabbinic writings before the time of Jesus constitute parables, but no less an authority than Joachim Jeremias makes this positive statement, «Jesus» parables are something entirely new.

It may be that there are «people who do understand Rand» as well as you do and find something lacking or less than inspiring about her writing.

There is one gospel, applicable to the whole of life, and to truncate it at any point is to make it into something less than the good news of salvation for which the world waits.

There are, in the history of philosophy, continually renewed controversies between those who, where the theory of knowledge is concerned, are commonly called realists, and those who are sometimes called idealists, but also constructivists, between those for whom truth resides in the end in correspondence between proposition and fact, and those for whom it is something brought into being by more or less autonomous understanding.

The lesser kinds of reverence have been noted only in order that we may be quite clear that even in Catholic circles the term worship is applied normally to God and none other, although it is important that we understand that by association with God and His presence and work, creatures are seen in the Christian tradition as worthy of something even more remarkable than the respect for personality of which democracy has spoken — they are worthy of reverence which is religious in quality, reverence about which there is a mystery, just as in human personality itself there is a deep mystery by reason of its being grounded in the mystery of God.

But on the whole, there is enough evidence at least to suggest that, if one wants to have both a market economy and democracy, it is better to have the former precede the latter» if you will, to have perestroika before glasnost (it being understood, of course, that Gorbachev had something other than full capitalism in mind with the former term, and something less than full democracy with the latter).

There was, of course, some internal debate as to what that philosophy should he or how it should be arrived at, but so long as proponents could claim something of the sanction of the scientific heritage, they could present their outlooks, not as one ideology among many, but as ones that were fair to everyone, since they were, if not wholly objective, at least more or less so.

We can't simply explain something mysterious by appealing to something more mysterious for which there is even less evidence.

Yet there is something in certain parts of his «Catholics at Home» (May) that seems something less than forthright.

But there is something else required, something less exciting than the task of developing new programs and strategies, but essential to any renewal of liberalism's promise.

If you're like me, something seems different about your Facebook feed this November: There's seems to be a lot less facial hair.

The middle paragraph deals with the historical facts of Christ, but with something else too — namely, the relation of Christ to God, so there can be no mistake among Christians as to the major insistence of all Christian experience, that when we meet Christ we meet nothing less than God Himself.

For most persons less mature, and for many of us who have prayed for years, there is need of something concrete and tangible to direct one's thought and keep it from running out into frayed ends.

I'm speculating that maybe some of the people in the crowd that day were there with something less than pure religious motives.

There are something like 406411 Catholic priests out there in the world (according to a 2005 census) and less than half of 1 % have been charged with a cThere are something like 406411 Catholic priests out there in the world (according to a 2005 census) and less than half of 1 % have been charged with a cthere in the world (according to a 2005 census) and less than half of 1 % have been charged with a crime.