Is
there such a thing as truth, or only skewed perspectives?
Not exact matches
Everyone's heard the phrase «
there's no
such thing as bad PR», but nothing could be further from the
truth.
In today's episode of the Shadow of
Truth we apply Orwell's quote — «In our age,
there is no
such thing as «keeping out of politics.»
There is no
such thing as a commandmet keeper (can only be done with Christ within) that does not love... and tell the
truth.
The liberal superstition that in political and social questions
there is
such a
thing as pure, unmanipulated
truth, seems to enjoy remarkable currency among the socialist Left.
If we define faith
as «confidence» or «conviction» based on the evidence presented, and once we recognize that
there is no
such thing as «degrees of faith,» then this leads to the
truth that faith is not a work.
I wish
there was a scientific test that told everyone the
truth about
things such as greed, arrogance, envy, anger, lust and other downfalls of our character.
It is at these moments that I realize the
truth that
there is no
such thing as «secular.»
Peace2all, I think what you are saying is
there is no
such thing as truth.
And I would also like to point out that the idea of rights is subjective too according to your arguments,
there is no
such thing as truth and everyone should just live life the way they want too.
When I preached through Paul's letter to the Ephesians about 15 years ago, I taught that if one has to choose between
truth or love, one should always choose
truth, for
there is no
such thing as a loving lie.
There is
such a
thing as truth by the way.
You have blind faith that prevents you from seeing the
truth that we are alone and
there is in fact no
such thing as God.
There is no such thing as a double truth, and to certain questions there is only one true answer — even when bishops, and entire conferences, give contradictory ans
There is no
such thing as a double
truth, and to certain questions
there is only one true answer — even when bishops, and entire conferences, give contradictory ans
there is only one true answer — even when bishops, and entire conferences, give contradictory answers.
There is no such thing as biblical truth because there is no truth in the b
There is no
such thing as biblical
truth because
there is no truth in the b
there is no
truth in the bible.
Michael Polanyi5 suggests, for example, that loyalty to
truth presupposes that
there is
such a
thing as truth and that
there is an obligation to seek it.
We are not denying that
there is
such a
thing as eternal
Truth, unaffected by human history; we are simply denying that any man actually has such a truth, for eternal, unconditioned Truth exists only with
Truth, unaffected by human history; we are simply denying that any man actually has
such a
truth, for eternal, unconditioned Truth exists only with
truth, for eternal, unconditioned
Truth exists only with
Truth exists only with God.
He underscores to
such an extent the inadequacy of expressions or formulations of the
truth that it remains unclear how he prevents himself from sliding into the position that inadequacy of expression entails inexpressibility of
truth, or prevents interpretations endlessly deferring to other interpretations,
such that we never have a statement that is simply true — even in Sacred Scripture, and hence that
there could be no
such thing as revealed (determinate)
truth, expressing itself in and through sentences.
The
truth is this: that since atheists are people who have allowed a part their beings to die, how can they possibly understand those who speak of life which they not know??? It's like when a blind man would argue with the one who sees, telling him that
there is no
such thing as sight, and all the beauty he's seeing and describing to him is just the figment of his immagination...!!!
In the last century that legend was reduced to just the one word, «Veritas,» and at Harvard
there is obviously no consensus on what that
truth might be or even on whether
there is
such a
thing as truth.
Yet if
there is
such a
thing as truth in our beliefs and practices, then ignoring those
truths is not an expression of mercy, but a form of spiritually damaging confusion — dangerous for the individual, and dangerous for the believing community
as a whole.
This thinker, whose name I shall not disclose, said that he was becoming more and more convinced that
there was «something in the older metaphysical — he called them «ontological» — claims; at the moment he was much concerned, he said, to find a way of giving more than linguistic status to
such propositions
as «personal God», for it appeared to him that these statements somehow pointed to a
truth about the universe, about the nature of
things, that must be reckoned with in any honest description of the «way
things are».
Unless you say
there's no
such thing as Truth, just different «
truths» that «coexist».
The bible appears to promote violence in selected passages, but the very fact that Christians analyze scripture with the underlying belief that
there is
such a
thing as an objective
truth and morality we don't have the freedom in our doctrine to falsely interpret passages from Leviticus to justify killing while ignoring Christ and the ten commandments.
Islam,
as people know today, was Hebrew teachings or teachings of son of blessed Mary, was never about religion, but
truth absolute Thin Allah, so much so, word religion did not exist in Hebrew language or in even in Qu «ran,
there is no
such thing as religion, but Thin Allah, consti tution of America, other wise known
as Law of West.
As Thomas Haskell once wrote: «If there is no such thing as truth but only a variety of incommensurable perspectives in criterionless competition with one another, then force and persuasion become indistinguishable, cutting the ground out from under any politics based on consent and representation.&raqu
As Thomas Haskell once wrote: «If
there is no
such thing as truth but only a variety of incommensurable perspectives in criterionless competition with one another, then force and persuasion become indistinguishable, cutting the ground out from under any politics based on consent and representation.&raqu
as truth but only a variety of incommensurable perspectives in criterionless competition with one another, then force and persuasion become indistinguishable, cutting the ground out from under any politics based on consent and representation.»
Truth be told,
there is no
such thing as a «perfect» pairing!
I'll talk about the latter point in a minute, but the
truth is,
there's no
such thing as a «weight loss protein powder».
The problem is that many don't see that
there is
such a
thing as natural law,
as absolute
truth - some
things are always bad, like murder, and some
things are always good, like snuggling and holding babies.
And while we may have all heard the phrase «sleeping like a baby,» the
truth is
there really isn't
such thing as sleeping like a baby.
The two statements can co-exist quite happily - that some people disagree on what religious
truth might look like, doesn't therefore mean that
there can never be
such a
thing as religious
truth, and that a particular religion can't be the the most faithful expression of it.
Either way,
there is here, once again, no
such thing as objective
truth — just the passing shades of our own subjective experiences, like shadows on a wall.
Actually, the
truth is
there is no
such thing as muscle toning.
The
truth is,
there is no
such thing as perfection when it comes to eating and I used to have a terrible, awful, horrendous diet.
The
truth is,
there is no
such thing as «not losing weight because you're eating too little.»
Feebly structured
as a Rashomon of the rink, I, Tonya culminates with its protagonist, years removed from both her glory and infamy, declaring this wearying axiom: «
There's no
such thing as truth.
Margot Robbie had a brilliant performance and Sebastian Stan will forever be one of my favorites.I also loved the fact that this film say something about what «
truth» really is, that
there's no
such thing as truth, or that your own story is your own
truth.
These to - camera interviews reveal contradicting accounts of events, pointedly portraying the postmodern idea of
there being no objective truth, an idea summed up not so subtly at the end of the movie — «There's no such thing as truth, it's bullshit, everyone has their own truth, and life just does whatever the fuck it wants&ra
there being no objective
truth, an idea summed up not so subtly at the end of the movie — «
There's no such thing as truth, it's bullshit, everyone has their own truth, and life just does whatever the fuck it wants&ra
There's no
such thing as truth, it's bullshit, everyone has their own
truth, and life just does whatever the fuck it wants».
Because in
truth,
there's no
such thing as a car that's too valuable to use.
In
truth there is no
such thing as a risk - free asset.
Truth:
There is no
such thing as good debt.
The
truth is that
there is no
such thing as a «dose» of CBD for your pet in the traditional sense.
After all, the
truth is that
there is no
such thing as bad dogs - but
there is
such a
thing as an uneducated owner.
The
truth is
there's no
such thing as a puppy cut other than what pertains to a young poodle under 9 months: however, the term has been misused in regards to any breed.
There are no truths and no such thing as alternative facts, there are only good bad drawings and poorly - drawn paint
There are no
truths and no
such thing as alternative facts,
there are only good bad drawings and poorly - drawn paint
there are only good bad drawings and poorly - drawn paintings.
Lots of
things are «defamatory per se» that are not actionable, because
there are obvious defenses,
such as truth or fair comment — both of which are available to Steyn, in my opinion.
The onus is not on me to prove (
there is no
such thing as scientific proof) that the IPCC assessment is dramatically different from the
truth.
As such, adherents believe that there is no such thing as a «Truth» that can be discovered through traditional, rational, inductive / deductive processe
As such, adherents believe that
there is no
such thing as a «Truth» that can be discovered through traditional, rational, inductive / deductive processe
as a «
Truth» that can be discovered through traditional, rational, inductive / deductive processes.
To the scientist,
there are no
such things as a scientific «
truths»;
there are only competing hypotheses with which we have more or less confidence.
If my assumption that facts =
truths is correct, then I don't think that
there are
such things as «alternative facts».