Not exact matches
When some asshat like you, just sayin, HeavenSent, Bob, etc. make blanket statements and refuse to respond to corrections,
criticisms, or
valid points refuting those statements, then
there is no point in bringing up any kind of argument.
There are many points where a
criticism of Israel may be
valid, and therefore not anti-Semitic.
In the ensuing discussion,
there was
criticism of my rejection of «the majority opinion of «experts»» as a good or
valid method to base my position.
If I had left it
there, the
criticism might have been
valid.
While Alexis Sanchez has received
criticism this season too for his moaning attitude at times, Ozil can be particularly frustrating as if he isn't being creative and decisive in the final third, then
there is a
valid argument that he becomes a liability for the team as a whole.
However,
there is one
criticism of Corbyn's reshuffle which is
valid.
But amid the
valid criticism,
there are language tropes and modes of thinking that many slip into without interrogation.
Why are these people
valid in their
criticism yet for some reason when a democrat (who happens to be of mixed race) is in office
there is no
criticism other than pure racism.
I did do some checking up, when
criticisms were made, and found
there are some pretty
valid explanations for the work.
There are also
valid criticisms of the China Study.
While
there is certainly some
valid criticism of PUA's, as I write about in a later article, I personally don't believe in the use of any kind of verbal trickery (lies, insults) to build attraction with the opposite sex.
The
criticisms of its glib race attitudes are
valid, but
there is a great deal to recommend, such as its foul - mouthed comedy and seasoned performers (Woody Harrelson, Sam Rockwell and Peter Dinklage).
There's plenty of
valid negative
criticism about THE COUNSELOR that doesn't boil down to wanting something more cheerful.
There may be
valid criticisms of how much you can extrapolate from his data.
Are
there valid points made among the
criticisms?
Despite the obvious care this device exhibits for Nintendo to their fans,
there is
valid criticism.
There has been some very
valid criticisms of the title, Leigh Alexander's piece being a must read while I for one really quite enjoyed it despite the issues.
There are some
valid criticisms of the IPCC process, however.
If
there is to be a
valid criticism of the «97 %» as shown in the Cook paper, then the
criticism [today] would be that the 97 % is based on somewhat dated information [i.e. being on papers averaging about 10 years old by now].
A more
valid criticism is that I'm actually taking out too much data, as the eruptions are only partially responsible for cooling in that period — for instance
there was a La Niña episode in 1984
In fact, in a very contrite reply to a comment on their paper, they not only agreed with the commenter that his
criticism was potentially
valid but they pointed out that
there were other even more important deficiencies in their model.
Anyway, I can not see anything in what you have said that makes me think
there is a
valid criticism of the distribution used.
There are many
valid criticisms of LG's last flagship, the G4.