Sentences with phrase «there very nature»

Markets are, by there very nature, volatile.

Words, by there very nature are open to interpretation and subject to context.

These investments, by there very nature, would also have significant positive externalities for the rest of the economy.

Not exact matches

«We see that trend happening next year even around other holidays like Valentine's Day or Mother's Day, because there's a very competitive nature and they need to stretch those promotions out early and often.»

«When you hire [more than a thousand] employees quickly, there's the question of how you scale and keep customers happy, and all of the stuff that is very operational in nature,» Hamid says.

Buying a luxury car is more than just purchasing mobility and by the very nature of the cars we create, there is a natural fit with the growing business of experiences.

By its very nature, the ocean is downstream from everything which means that a significant proportion of our waste inevitably ends up there, unless we close the loop on our waste cycle and begin producing sustainably.

«Human nature desires quick results, there is a particular zest in making money quickly, and remoter gains are discounted by the average man at a very high rate» John Maynard Keynes

Religion is a very bad mental disease, without religion there would be fewer starving people in the world, we would have settled Mars by now, and the abusive GOP and it's greedy banker uber - rich masters would be disempowered, as it is their veil of religion that disguises their evil, immoral and unethical nature.

There's Arkansas, bounty hunters, snakes real, human, and symbolic, being rescued from a snake pit by a very errant knight, a display of the gratuitous slaughter that comes when you take the law in your own hands, a deep commentary on place, displacement, the state of nature, and the techno - forces of the modern world and modern government, solidly American thoughts on law, property, justice, and keeping your word, and so forth and so on.

Which things being without number in our mind itself, (the nature of which mind is incapable of being seen,) not to mention others, the very faith whereby we believe, or the thought whereby we know that we either believe any thing, or believe not, being as it is altogether alien from the sight of those eyes; what so naked, so clear, what so certain is there to the inner eyes of our minds?

Because they're very nature are INFERIOR to the spiritual relationship we'll share with God and everyone else up there!

That's great but we all know that long - term strategies by their very nature, take a long time to come through and there are crises happening in mental health here and now that need to be resolved.»

Violeta John 1:3: «In the beginning there was one God, who had reason, purpose and a plan, which was, by its very nature and origin, divine.

(CNN)- There's a misconception among many faithful folks that religious convictions, by their very nature, are set in stone.

Pace Donald Sherburne's solution (viz. ditching God altogether, positing the multiplicity of actual entities as the only source of a plural «order, meaning and value»), one possible response might run as follows: in the primordial nature there are no general (fixed a priori) standards of value, there is only the capacity to offer «guidelines» relative to already individuated worlds, This, or something very like it, seems to be the solution implicitly adopted by Christian when he says of the primordial nature:

This presents a very difficult moral quandary concerning God's nature for which there is no satisfactory answer.

There remained now no canon, except again personal opinion, by which to redefine the very nature of inspiration, let alone to distinguish between the substance of doctrine and its mode of presentation — a distinction they had never been willing to admit before in any case.

Any honest survey of the situation makes clear that there are very considerable differences in the movement of God in and through nature, history, and human life.

There is a very good section on beauty — appreciating beauty (in nature, in music, in people's kindnesses) and encouraging it in oneself.

We have seen, too, that violence by its very nature is without limits — that there is no such thing as a tiny dose of violence for realizing this or that particular purpose.

Even so, Schleiermacher surrendered very little, and his own consciousness's appropriation of God's being, «in relation to us» of course, included and emphasized the traditional attributes of omnipotence, eternity, omnipresence, and omniscience.5 And for him, «immutability» is already contained within the notion of God's eternity.6 Causality within the entire system of nature can be exhaustively accounted for by God's causal activity.7 Following the lead of Aquinas, Schleiermacher declared that there is no distinction between potential and actual in God.8

your understanding of the change process is very simplistic, because your mind is not open, you specifically believe already in the traditional doctrines, Dogmas as shown in thousands of years of history evolves, and the need for input variables, meaning the diversity of religious belief is necessay because nature through his will is requiring this to happen, we are being educated by God in the events of history.In the past when there was no humans yet Gods will is directly manifisted in nature, with our coming and education through history, we gradually takes the responsibilty of implementing the will.Your complaint on your perception of abuse is just part of the complex process of educating us through experience.

Again the symbolic nature of the account is obvious: there is no «very high mountain» (Mt 4:8) in the wilderness of Judea; there is no mountain anywhere from which all the kingdoms of the world are visible.

There seems to be a certain recalcitrance at the very center of man's nature which inhibits him in doing that which he knows to be good.

Ture says that no matter how overwhelming the might of the oppressor, it is in the very nature of the people that they will struggle and struggle and struggle for as long as they are oppressed until at last they achieve their liberation.6 Vincent Harding's history — There is a River — emphasizes the inevitability of the African - American struggle for liberation.

A «pro-life» person, if not a pacifist, would be very reluctant to go to war, recognizing that war is not inevitable and that there is nothing in human nature that inevitably leads to war.

The relationship of the finite creature with the supremely worshipful and unsurpassable deity is being affirmed; and along with it there is also affirmed the possibility of its becoming on occasion a matter of conscious knowledge on the part of the human, as it is always a present reality in the very nature of God himself.

There is no longer serious doubt in my mind that human life exists within the womb from the very onset of pregnancy, despite the fact that the nature of the intrauterine life has been the subject of considerable dispute in the past.

Very true Capitalist, they won't provide any argument because their is no actual way to know whether or not there is a god or the nature of existence after death.

Very true Capitalist, the believers won't provide any argument because their is no actual way to know whether or not there is a god or the nature of existence after death.

There are goods which by their very nature can not and must not be bought and sold... Nevertheless these mechanisms carry the risk of an «idolatry» of the market.

While God's love is very much there, his nature will destroy you without some kind of protection.

Conservatives cherry - pick those passages that support their conservative view of God based on their conservative ego, and vice versa, where liberals are concerned... and there is NO way to ascertain which is true, except on a wholly subjective, personal level, thus it will never be proven objectively, since Spirit, by it's very nature, has absolutely nothing at all to do with the flesh and whatever seems to be happening on this earth, because Spirit is completely opposite, and therefore invisible to the naked human eye, being of the mind only, and therefore unprovable.

I think that most people would admit that they hope for or would be very pleased if there were such a «factor» in nature.

Jane Addams, who saw very deeply into human nature, expressed it when she said that in all wholesome human relations there is a forgiveness in advance.

the reason you did nt include it is simply because it highlighted what you did nt want to talk about, namely that ANY passage in dispute is clearly identified as such, AND that nature of the dispute makes it VERY clear that whether or not there was a later change or not is still not determined by any measure.

In life as it is given to us to live, there seem to be permanent conditions which stand against the order of mutuality so that this world yearns for a good which in its very nature it can not embody.

For far from being a deviation from biblical truth, this setting of man over against the sum total of things, his subject - status and the object - status and mutual externality of things themselves, are posited in the very idea of creation and of man's position vis - a-vis nature determined by it: it is the condition of man meant in the Bible, imposed by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).

It is very interesting that when St. Thomas Aquinas asks if God could have united the nature of an angel to himself, although in the end and on — I think — pretty weak grounds he rejects this argument, he speculates: «There are some who say an angelic nature could not have been assumed because angels not being generated or corrupted are from the moment of their creation perfect in their personality,» (ST III, q. 4, a. 2).

There'll be commonalities, and aspects of paradise that were relayed by God to his prophets, but if everyone's wishes come true, it can't help but be personalized, by its very nature.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

There is the dogmatic principle which argues that supernatural truths committed to human language are necessary and definitive of their very nature.

The restoration of just order is by its very nature a moral protection of society, but there is much to be said even if we consider only physical protection.

The theories that nowadays exist in the sciences can hardly fathom the outward nature and sight of there being another dimension outside of our matted universal cosmos of immeasurable cosmos (plural) where resides a very huge world of such an outwardly dimensioned realm of extreme cosmic relativism.

The philosophical naturalist's view of reality is not one that merely fails to find some particular object within the world that the theist imagines can be descried there; it is a very particular representation of the nature of things, entailing a vast range of purely metaphysical commitments.

I love the idea that God says: Look, you cretins, there are certain results to the way we are, to selfishness, and there's a mortality as part of your very sinful nature, and, let's face it, you're not living a very good life, are you?

Of course it is also true that a certain amount of stability is part of the very nature of hierarchies in that hierarchical structuring prevents the collapse of the whole edifice if there is a local disturbance at one of the levels.

There are Pythagorean enigmas here, occult and imponderable: mystic proportions written into the very fabric of nature of which we were once as ignorant as of the existence of other galaxies.

It is at the heart of the philosophy and theology of the Faith movement that there is a directing, controlling force in nature such that «higher» being educes and evokes «lower» being as part of the very fabric of the universe itself.