Sentences with phrase «therefore god exists»

Therefore god exists, because the rule is proof, and proof that god exists because there is a rule.

† Christianity can not explain the origins of the universe, therefore God exists.

I think he's about to make the fallacy that the scientists who confirmed these things were religious therefore god exists.

And if you also posit that «Everything must have a creator, therefore God exists», you have committed a serious logical error.

This is the concept of that beyond which thought can not go, in which it completes its search for understanding, at which it really affirms only itself, and through which it relates all else.2 Leaving aside his views on its historical character, this is what R. G. Collingwood seems to be suggesting when he says that Anselm's argument does not prove «that because our idea of God is an ideal of id quo maius cogitari nequit therefore God exists, but that because our idea of God is an idea of id quo maius cogitari nequit we stand committed to belief in God's existence.

† Atheism can not explain the origins of the universe, therefore God exists.

«If God does not exist, that would make me sad, therefore God exists» = logic fail.

More people have died because of athiesm, therefore God exists.

If God exists, the Bible will state His existence The Bible states Gods existence Therefore God exists.

Life has a purpose, therefore God exists.

Not exact matches

I will pose it plainly there is no measurable evidence that a god exists and therefore there is no god.

You are correct, if one assumes atheism or a fundamentally different religious cosmology, that the possibility I stated will seem like a false cause (this unemployment came later, therefore that cosmic battle caused it), but again, that would come down to the age - old debate over whether there is a God v. Satan battle in the classical Christian sense (do either God or Satan exist and, if so, how?).

To those who look at the world and say «see how old it is, therefore God does not exist because the bible states that it is only 6 - 10 thousand years old» you may never get this comment.

Chad If god made everything, and knows what is going to happen until the end of time, then at the time he created everything, he knew what was going to happen, so he made it happen by creating everything in the first place... therefore free will is not existing, or god did not create everything... you can't have it both ways

Because many of you claimed you're atheists yet you know what God means to you also know bibles since many of you DID read it and know God and Jesus therefore you're not atheist but truly are agnostic because you all WANT proof that if God is existed or not..

This has not happened with me for many months now; therefore this god does not exist.

Stephen Hawking makes the claim that nothing could have existed before it, therefore a god could not have created it.

«There is no evidence of God, and therefore, God does not exist» appeals to an argument from ignorance.

If it is not necessary that there be finite actualities, and if in fact they have not always existed, it makes no sense to talk about necessary principles governing their mutual relations and therefore limiting what God can do with them.

Therefore to argue that God exists is to deny him.»

The word «faith» exists in the English language, therefore god created the universe.

Therefore an all - powerful, perfectly moral god does not exist.

The crisis of preaching, therefore, exists because the meanings of the gospel are unmet by the meanings we bring out of our lives; and the meanings that emerge out of living are unmet by the timeless meanings of God's Word for us.

You should therefore understand that for people like me, that are completely unable to have an ecclesiastical experience in my bathroom mirror, god does not exist.

Because he has presented no evidence, no such evidence must exist, therefore his god must not exist.

We know for a fact that all religious books are false and therefore, the gods described by those stories do not exist.

Therefore, your god does not exist.

There is not a shred of evidence that any god exists, therefore when you speak of a god, the only term that applies is «opinion».

Therefore, your God can not exist because he claims we have freewill yet has caused our every action to be predetermined.

The Atheists is because there is no proof of your god, therefore it doesn't exist.

well let me just say that we will find out one day that God does not answer to us... rather we answer to God... your problem is with God... but then again u do nt believe in God... so therefore your problem does not exist....

Therefore there must exist a pre-eminently peerless stinker, and we call him God.»

Should God exist and not be provable, then he is not falsifiable, and therefore fails a basic logical test.

But the process theist would insist that God must always work with an already existing creaturely order and that changes in this order can therefore come about only gradually through the agency of divine persuasion.

McCabe did not hesitate to draw the conclusion, therefore, that contingency must exist within God himself.

Therefore God does not exist.

Given that there is no actual evidence for any god, it is highly unlikely any god exists, therefore it is very likely that everyone knows more any alleged, but never proven, god.

For so long as they buy into the argument science can not explain X, therefore the Judeo - Christian god exists, there will always be an unflipped rock for their god to hide under.

Therefore, anything bad that ever happens — slavery, natural disasters, cancer, war, etc — is proof that God (or at least a god worth our time and love) does not exiGod (or at least a god worth our time and love) does not exigod worth our time and love) does not exist.

The fact that not having a God would make something difficult does not mean that a God must therefore exist.

Due to the fact that we can't prove god does not exist merely means we see no evidence for one and therefore, don't believe one exists.

You're making the assertion that god exists, therefore the burden of proof is on you to actually provide evidence of what you're asserting.

While I am not religious (I will call myself agnostic), and having an IQ well over genius levels, with scientific and mathematical tendencies, let me ask you a few questions, because what I see here are a bunch of people talking about «no evidence» or «proof» of God's existence, therefore He can't possibly exist, existential arguments, which are not arguments, but fearful, clouded alterations of a truth that can not be seen.

(before religion or science) Therefore, the monotheistic code / pattern to the life cycle of water that never ceases to exist but only changes into one of its three energy determined forms is a valid example of the «perfectly infinite» (oxymoron term) actuality of «matter» / «Hope» /» God.»

But it doesn't therefore mean a traffic god exists.

Therefore, to decide accurately whether God exists may require a more whole - person response, rather than just a mind or language game «in the head.»

Therefore, God exists.

So how come you know that he exists, by just accepting, when I actually went directly to him to find out if he is there???? The answer is simple, because god can not be less fair than a human, he therefore does not exist.

Therefore, a god does not exist.

Therefore, there is no god (s) without the universe since you need human imagination for god (s) to «exist» in those people's minds.