Sentences with phrase «therefore have the same effect»

Buying a falling stock can therefore have the same effect as trying to catch a falling knife — it is likely that you will get hurt!

Not exact matches

Additional uncertainty in these calculations arises from the assumption that a 10 per cent GST has the same effect on the retail price as a 10 per cent WST, even though the WST is levied at an earlier stage of production and therefore represents a smaller amount of tax for a given tax rate.

In the case of same - sex couples adopting children, it has only been a relatively short time that same - sex couples have been able to adopt and foster and therefore, there has not been time for a proper analysis to be carried out into the effects such placements have on the children's educational, emotional and developmental wellbeing.

Semety... I wasn't using the story to illustrate whether he was a «good person»... he may not have been, but if Jesus approved of his response, then it was obviously the «right» response and therefore good.Jesus appears to be giving credit where credit is due.Likewise, we call a familiar story «The Parable of the Good Samaratin», not The Parable of the Not - That - Good Samaritan.The gospel narrative wdn't have the same emotional effect if we cdn't recognize and «identify with the goodness of the hero.»

Therefore interpretation of the word «shall» should logically have the same effect regarding both situations.

They found a clear age - related cohort effect: «No difference can be found within the younger generation — people who had either not been born at the time of the Fall of the Berlin Wall, or had not yet reached school - age, and who therefore grew up within the same western society.

It's the same like with the barbell bench press, you still need to work on your balance and arm coordination, but you can put a lot of weight on it which means that you'll lift more and therefore have a greater effect.

This sounds very complicated to me, but it looks to me like there is a possibility that two incomplete proteins from different food sources (which in amino acid counts and percentage may in theory add up to complete proteins) may not actually be broken down the same way by the body as an actual complete protein, or even the same time and therefore may have very different effect on cancer.

However, they don't have the same positive effect of estrogen and can therefore cause havoc on the system, and need to be metabolized and eliminated as well.

Starches are basically processed in your body the same as sugar, and therefore have the same detrimental effect.

It's Got: Excellent performances from Kate Winslet and Kirsten Dunst, and a surprisingly restrained (and therefore tolerable) one from Jim Carrey; visual effects that manage to be both low - key and gobsmacking at the same time; and a funny, twisted, bleak, sentimental screenplay that could only have been written by Charlie Kaufman.

Taking the absolute worst - case possible interpretation of your example above (which would be if BookBub's «ranking effect» impacted all promoted books in the same direction, and was therefore additive), we would have 167 sales x 300 books = 50,000 sales worth of error.

Contributions to a qualified workplace retirement plan, such as a 401 (k) or 403 (b), have essentially the same tax - lowering effect, but they are not technically tax deductions, since they are not counted as current - year income and therefore do not appear on your tax return.

CBD does not have the same type of cardiac effect and is therefore much safer for at - risk populations.

They get > 100 % because they argue that the anthropogenic warming effects have to overcome the aerosol cooling (and therefore give the same net warming as the total warming since 1950), though most people count aerosols as part of the anthropogenic effect, which causes the confusion.

So, I again restate it by saying the cycles may have varied such as to increase or diminish any change to the assumed effect of AGW and, therefore, your estimate of climate sensitivity is erroneous for the same reason that all such atribution studies in the IPCC AR4 are erroneous.

We also know that both C and D are very much larger than both A and B, therefore a small change in either C or D will have the same effect as a large change in A or B.

But don't take to much notice of me as I also believe that Advection i.e. the kind of horizontal air movements that follow isobaric surfaces and therefore are predominantly horizontal) have got more of a Green House Effect (GHE) than does a radiation circuit, of say 324 W / m ² originally removed from the surface, and then returned via Green House Gases (GHGs)-- which, by the way, show no sign of having warmed at all (no hot spot) But even so, when somehow the same 324 W / m ² are delivered back to the surface for absorption it is supposed to be getting warmer.

Civil courts have taken a hard line on the legal effect of acquittals, finding they are generally irrelevant to a civil suit for damages based on the same alleged misconduct and, therefore, are inadmissible.

2) apart from the fact that CJEU stated that even before EU exercising its power, the MS must still act - when they have the power to do so - in a matter which does not jeopardise or prejudice the EU, so that the mere «potential» competence does have an effect, limitating the MS action, the parallel is that a negative rule is still a rule, so that the existence of the rule makes the matter «regulated»: - as for the JHA, I must say that whilst I agree with you on the merits, I can see the issue raised by the CJEU, since it is quite the same raised by some national Constitutional Courts, i.e. that ECHR standards may be in conflict with national standards and formally speaking the ECHR is a treaty and therefore has a lower rank that national Constititions, and the decision of the ECHR on the interpretation of such standards within the context of the Convention does not bind the national Constitutional Court in interpreting the national Constitution standards: e.g..