While this engine is by no means one of the more powerful ones on the market, it does exactly what it promises — gets you to your destination using less energy, and
therefore less fuel.
Not exact matches
The report said Qantas recorded poor
fuel efficiency because it used older,
fuel - intensive aircraft, carried a low amount of freight (
therefore making it
less efficient) and also had relatively low numbers of passengers on each plane.
Cars stuck in traffic do zero mpg; a motorcycle no matter what capacity will always beat a car on
fuel consumption in city traffic and
therefore creates considerably
less pollution - another reason for encouraging the motorcycle.
After all, aren't diesels the green cars, the ones that use
less fuel than petrol - run cars and
therefore conserve natural resources and reduce global warming?
Therefore, it will cost
less to manufacture PRISM metallic
fuel and the design requires a relatively small plant size to disposition the plutonium.
However, on average a diesel engine tends to be between 30 % to 40 % more eficient in
fuel consumption than its equivelant engine size petrol counterpart,
therefore, per km the diesel engine will emit
less.
Armed with what we've quickly learned about macros and what it takes to lose weight, losing fat on a skinny fat diet is (to put it simply) a process where we eat
less than what's required of our bodies,
therefore forcing fat energy to be used up to
fuel us throughout our day.
Yet these fats are
less susceptible to oxidation, and this may be why they show up in LDL — because they are of higher quality and
therefore should preferentially be delivered to the tissues for functional roles rather than as
fuel (i.e., free fatty acids).
Therefore, as you increase your exercise intensity level the
fuel for your muscles will become increasingly derived from carbohydrates and
less derived from fat.
Therefore the longer this is the case the
less fuel will be consumed.
The smaller engine uses 14 percent
less fuel than the two - liter unit, and
therefore also produces
less CO2 emissions.
The 911 also features some clever aerodynamics to reduce drag — including active aero grilles at the front that open and close — using
less energy to cut through the air and
therefore improving
fuel economy.
The Audi S1 Sportback five - door version is slightly heavier and
therefore slightly
less fuel - efficient than the three - door, returning 39.8 mpg, or 38.7 mpg on the larger wheels.
The
fuel pump also runs only when there is a demand for
fuel, and
therefore uses
less energy.
Typically the majority of European car drivers cover
less than 25 miles (40 km) a day and
therefore the EV range offered by this technology will support the majority of short urban journeys, where
fuel economy and emissions are of prime concern.
The PTC heating element is required because, due to their high thermal efficiency, the sophisticated CDI and CGIengines are very economical on
fuel and,
therefore, give off much
less heat to warm up the coolant than conventional engines when running under partial load.
The two turbodiesel models will
therefore be an even
less seldom sight at the filling station from now on; the B 180 CDI can clock up over 1000 kilometres on a single tank of
fuel (54 litres).
Furthermore, all of the engines in the line - up are now far more economical on
fuel and,
therefore, emit even
less CO2, despite a substantial increase in output in many cases.
The sporty credentials of the 2008 SLK generation are further enhanced by three modified powerplants that consume
less fuel and,
therefore, emit
less CO2.
The aircraft structure is made of lightweight carbon fiber reinforced plastic,
therefore, it uses 25 percent
less fuel and produces 25 percent
less fewer environmental damaging emissions.
While nuclear energy is regarded as the
lesser of the two evils when compared at an emission level to the burning of fossil -
fuels, it may trump on the containment of the heat process, which burns in a contained nuclear reactor through an in - ward heat - chemical reaction called fission, but nuclear energy production is a chain from uranium mining to the toxic waste disposal and
therefore as an entire process is an equally high risk environmental option.
Each of those assessments attempts to account for all the greenhouse gases emitted during the production and installation of solar cells, as well as how much energy solar cells produce — and,
therefore, how much
less carbon is emitted when switching from fossil
fuels.
I suspect that the amount of
fuel saved (and
therefore of emissions avoided) is far
less than 50 %.
Yes, insulating homes creates the possibility of their inhabitants using
less fuel, and
therefore paying
less in total for energy.
One of the benefits of organic production is that energy consumption and,
therefore, fossil
fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, are
less than that in conventional systems.