Sentences with phrase «therefore less heat»

High priority for hydration Young children have a higher proportion of body water than adults, and are therefore less heat tolerant and more susceptible to dehydration.

When your cells are starved of thyroid hormone, they produce less energy and therefore less heat.

Not exact matches

Mild winters mean less home heating, lower natural gas prices and therefore lower coal use.

Our initial belief was that as the weather heats up, more MLB totals would go OVER due to pitchers becoming more easily fatigued and the air being less - dense — therefore allowing the ball to travel further and produce more runs.

Although the number of cases from contaminated meat may be declining — the result, he says, of factors like more rigorous sanitary controls in slaughterhouses and thorough heating of hamburgers by fast - food chains — the bug is spreading farther in foods that are less likely to be cooked (and therefore sterilized), such as fruit and lettuce.

Unrefined sunflower oil is less heat - stable (and therefore well - suited to dishes that are either raw or cooked at low temperatures); but, will retain more of its original nutrient content, flavor, and color (light - amber).

The reason that extra virgin olive oil is good for you is that it is generally cold pressed without the use of heat and solvents to aid extraction, and also contains MUCH LESS polyunsaturated fats than canola oil, so is therefore more stable.

This process often requires heat and therefore may damage the heat labile constituents in the process, thus using a different, less efficient extraction solvent is perhaps better despite lowered extraction efficiency.

The imagined milieu of The Big Heat may look less freaky than that of that earlier Lang picture of an earlier generation, Dr. Mabuse der Spieler (1922), but its distortions are (therefore?)

A smaller turbocharger has less inertia and faster response time therefore: An added bonus was that close - coupled catalytic converters, located near the exhaust manifold heat up notably quickly to operating temperature, thereby reducing emissions.

The PTC heating element is required because, due to their high thermal efficiency, the sophisticated CDI and CGIengines are very economical on fuel and, therefore, give off much less heat to warm up the coolant than conventional engines when running under partial load.

For example, it recovers heat from exhaust gases to bring the engine up to its working temperature sooner, therefore less time is spent operating below maximum efficiency.

Heat is detrimental to supplements as it breaks down the nutrients and therefore rendering them less effective.

Furthermore, they provide different materials with which the heaters can interact — their irregular and aluminum surfaces create a less effective type of heat sink than the smooth concrete floor, and those heaters draped over engines will therefore reach higher and less controllable temperatures.

The mechanism being that the outside of the duvet is cooler than the inside of the duvet, and therefore the temperature differential with the heat sink is less, and therefore loss of heat is less.

As things heat up, I would therefore expect that hotter air will create less dense air and that said, air expansion would push the jet streams north and south as the tropics get more sunlight and the heat is trapped in the climate system, and absorbed slowly by the oceans.

Therefore the equilibrium temperature change would be somewhat less than that approximated by simply removing the heat trasported by the THC.

If as a result of physical processes (such as El Nino) warmer water reaches the surface of the ocean, so less heat is conducted from the atmosphere into the ocean and the atmopsheric temperature will therefore increase — on a much shorter — comparatively instantaneous — timescale.

The tracer changes provide even less constraint on how much the heat transport (and therefore climate) may have changed.

Therefore, more solar activity, less cosmic rays, less clouds, more heat.

Less heat therefore escapes to space, forcing the temperature of the whole troposphere to rise until once again the radiation to space equals the net insolation.

Your simplistic linear thinking aligns to CAGW alarmist pablum though: more people = more CO2 = more hot = rising seas, therefore; more robots = less people = less CO2 = less heat, etc. etc..

======================== The thermocline exists because of these, heated surface waters warmer and therefore less dense will sit on top of colder, denser water.

There would therefore be heat moved from the equator (where the hot air rises) towards the poles (where it cools and becomes less dense)-- errr, depending on the shape of the planet.

I believe the IPCC claim that high cloud is a positive feed back (traps heat) and low cloud is a negative feed back (reflects sunlight) and following IPCC simple logic we find that AGW will cause less rain and more droughts sooooooooooooooooo if we have less rain we have less low clouds therefore we must have more high cloud.

The modest surface to volume ratio that this affords means less heat loss and therefore a smaller demand on the performance of the building envelope.

Therefore it is only just that those who profit from the sale of petroleum and coal be taxed (a «carbon tax», which sounds less direct than, say, a gasoline tax, or a home - heating oil tax) with the proceeds of the tax to be paid back to citizens in various ways.

The latest catchphrase is that GHGs «slow down» the radiative heat loss by «scattering» a portion — some say half — and therefore the Earth's surfaces do not cool down as much as they would during the night as they would with less GHGs.

While nuclear energy is regarded as the lesser of the two evils when compared at an emission level to the burning of fossil - fuels, it may trump on the containment of the heat process, which burns in a contained nuclear reactor through an in - ward heat - chemical reaction called fission, but nuclear energy production is a chain from uranium mining to the toxic waste disposal and therefore as an entire process is an equally high risk environmental option.

Q3 - Does the difference between Tangaroa and Chelle et al imply that a change in DLR does not heat the ocean as much as a similar change in DSR and, therefore, the earth's heat content sensitivity is considerably less for DLR than DSR?

If it can be shown that a change in DSR puts more energy into the bulk ocean than a similar change in DLR then this implys that DLR is returned more quickly to space and therefore the earth's heat content sensitivity would be less for DLR than DSR.

The hypothesis being that the cosmic rays create cloud condensation nuclei which create lower level clouds which reflect incoming solar insolation, thereby causing less heating to the Earth / oceans, and therefore net cooling for as long as the condition lasts.

In effect, the colder object transfers all it can to the hotter object, but it will always have less to give than the hotter object, therefore the transfer of energy (flow of heat) must always be from hot to cold — unless external work is applied or some other change in universal entropy compensates.

This is because less outside air is needed to maintain air freshness, and therefore, less heating and cooling of that air is needed.

They also don't need to support themselves against gravity and therefore use less energy - meaning that for each calorie you put in, more is converted to meat not heat.

The 13 ″ MBP isn't as powerful because of multiple reasons, one being that professionals are more likely to want the additional screen space, and the more important reason is that it is physically much smaller, and therefore it has less heat dispersion, less battery, and less room for bigger chips.